Dietary Perceptions among Patients with Crohn's Disease in Clinical Remission: Comparison with an Era Preceding the Availability of Biologic Therapy.

Q2 Medicine Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases Pub Date : 2024-02-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000536281
Makoto Tanaka, Aki Kawakami, Kayoko Sakagami, Hiroaki Ito
{"title":"Dietary Perceptions among Patients with Crohn's Disease in Clinical Remission: Comparison with an Era Preceding the Availability of Biologic Therapy.","authors":"Makoto Tanaka, Aki Kawakami, Kayoko Sakagami, Hiroaki Ito","doi":"10.1159/000536281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dietary temperance significantly affects the quality of life of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and remains a major concern. However, perceptions of diet in remission may have changed from the era when treatment options were limited. Therefore, we compared the dietary perceptions and treatment of patients with CD in remission with previously published data from the time biologic therapy was not introduced.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared the data of 254 patients with CD in remission who completed a questionnaire survey in 2022 with those of 76 patients with CD in remission collected in 2003, when biologics were not used for maintenance therapy in Japan. Remission was defined as a CD activity index of 150 or less in both studies. Perceptions of diet (degree of eating whatever one likes) were assessed using single-item nominal scale responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of patients receiving enteral nutrition therapy had decreased (past vs. present: 43.4 vs. 12.6%), while the proportion of patients receiving biologic therapy increased (0 vs. 88.6%, respectively). The percentages of patients who responded \"not at all,\" \"sometimes,\" and \"mostly\" when asked if they could eat whatever they liked had changed, respectively, from 9.2%, 46.1%, and 44.7% in the past to 4.3%, 25.2%, and 70.5% in the present.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proportion of those who ate whatever they liked and the mean body mass index increased in comparison with the corresponding values 20 years ago. With the advent of biologic therapies, the number of patients with CD who can enjoy eating has increased.</p>","PeriodicalId":13605,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases","volume":"9 1","pages":"47-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10942792/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000536281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Dietary temperance significantly affects the quality of life of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and remains a major concern. However, perceptions of diet in remission may have changed from the era when treatment options were limited. Therefore, we compared the dietary perceptions and treatment of patients with CD in remission with previously published data from the time biologic therapy was not introduced.

Methods: We compared the data of 254 patients with CD in remission who completed a questionnaire survey in 2022 with those of 76 patients with CD in remission collected in 2003, when biologics were not used for maintenance therapy in Japan. Remission was defined as a CD activity index of 150 or less in both studies. Perceptions of diet (degree of eating whatever one likes) were assessed using single-item nominal scale responses.

Results: The percentage of patients receiving enteral nutrition therapy had decreased (past vs. present: 43.4 vs. 12.6%), while the proportion of patients receiving biologic therapy increased (0 vs. 88.6%, respectively). The percentages of patients who responded "not at all," "sometimes," and "mostly" when asked if they could eat whatever they liked had changed, respectively, from 9.2%, 46.1%, and 44.7% in the past to 4.3%, 25.2%, and 70.5% in the present.

Conclusion: The proportion of those who ate whatever they liked and the mean body mass index increased in comparison with the corresponding values 20 years ago. With the advent of biologic therapies, the number of patients with CD who can enjoy eating has increased.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床缓解期克罗恩病患者的饮食观念:与生物疗法问世前的对比。
导言:饮食节制严重影响克罗恩病(CD)患者的生活质量,仍然是一个主要问题。然而,与治疗方案有限的时代相比,缓解期患者的饮食观念可能已经发生了变化。因此,我们将处于缓解期的克罗恩病患者的饮食观念和治疗方法与之前公布的未引入生物疗法时的数据进行了比较:我们将 2022 年完成问卷调查的 254 名 CD 缓解期患者的数据与 2003 年收集的 76 名 CD 缓解期患者的数据进行了比较,当时日本尚未使用生物制剂进行维持治疗。在这两项研究中,缓解的定义都是 CD 活动指数达到或低于 150。对饮食的看法(喜欢吃什么就吃什么的程度)采用单项名义量表进行评估:结果:接受肠内营养治疗的患者比例有所下降(过去与现在:43.4% 与 12.6%),而接受生物治疗的患者比例有所上升(分别为 0 与 88.6%)。当被问及是否可以随意进食时,回答 "完全不能"、"有时 "和 "大部分 "的患者比例分别从过去的 9.2%、46.1% 和 44.7% 变为现在的 4.3%、25.2% 和 70.5%:结论:与 20 年前的相应数值相比,爱吃什么就吃什么的人群比例和平均体重指数都有所上升。随着生物疗法的出现,能够享受饮食的 CD 患者人数有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases
Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Role of Esophageal Physiologic Tests in Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Carotegrast Methyl in Japanese Patients with Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis. Perceptions and Responses to Diseases among Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Text Mining Analysis of Posts on a Japanese Patient Community Website. Impact of Concomitant Prescriptions and Lifestyle Factors on the Initial Course of Newly Diagnosed Inflammatory Bowel Disease. A Real-World Comparison of Drug Trough Levels between Patients Experiencing a Secondary Nonimmune Loss of Response and Those Maintaining a Response to Infliximab on Long-Term Maintenance Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1