Does the Prevalence of Obesity in the Different Regions of Spain Influence the Attitudes, Perception, and Barriers to Its Treatment?

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Facts Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-15 DOI:10.1159/000538257
Nuria Vilarrasa, Javier Salvador, Francisco Poyato, Miguel Ángel Rubio-Herrera
{"title":"Does the Prevalence of Obesity in the Different Regions of Spain Influence the Attitudes, Perception, and Barriers to Its Treatment?","authors":"Nuria Vilarrasa, Javier Salvador, Francisco Poyato, Miguel Ángel Rubio-Herrera","doi":"10.1159/000538257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The differences in the prevalence of obesity between the various regions of Spain, partly attributed to socioeconomic differences, may influence the approach to this disease. The aim of this study was to compare differences in attitudes, perception, and barriers to the treatment of obesity between people with obesity (PwO) and health care professionals (HCPs), between the different regions of Spain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sub-analysis of the ACTION-IO Spain study, which included 1,500 PwO and 306 HCP, was performed to identify differences in PwQ and HCPs belonging to regions with high prevalence of obesity (&gt;16%, n = 9 regions, high prevalence of obesity [HPO] group) and low prevalence of obesity (&lt;16%, n = 8 regions, low prevalence of obesity [LPO] group) (self-reported data), according to the 2017 National Health Survey of Spain.</p><p><strong>Statistics: </strong>comparison of proportions (χ2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 746 PwO belonged to HPO and 754 to LPO group. The PwO in HPO group were younger, had lower income, a lower level of higher education, higher unemployment rate, and fewer comorbidities. Obesity was considered a chronic disease to a higher extent in HPO compared to LPO group (62 vs. 56%), but this difference was not statistically significant. The PwO in HPO group discussed less with the HCPs about their excess weight (57 vs. 70%), did not feel motivated to lose weight in a higher percentage (26 vs. 18%), and felt less emotionally supported (16 vs. 24%). In HPO group, the preference for unhealthy food (51 vs. 36%), and the costs of healthy eating, anti-obesity drugs and bariatric surgery were perceived barriers to losing weight. A higher proportion of PwO in HPO group considered that exercise (58 vs. 40%) was more effective for achieving weight loss. In contrast, LPO group considered diet more effective (48 vs. 32%). HCPs in HPO group felt more motivated to treat obesity (83 vs. 68%) and a higher proportion (14 vs. 5%) identified the economic burden as one of the main reasons why PwO do not start conversations to lose weight.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is less concern and conversation about excess weight in PwO in regions with a higher prevalence of obesity, with socioeconomic limitations being one of the main perceived barriers to treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19414,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Facts","volume":" ","pages":"264-273"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11149964/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Facts","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538257","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The differences in the prevalence of obesity between the various regions of Spain, partly attributed to socioeconomic differences, may influence the approach to this disease. The aim of this study was to compare differences in attitudes, perception, and barriers to the treatment of obesity between people with obesity (PwO) and health care professionals (HCPs), between the different regions of Spain.

Methods: Sub-analysis of the ACTION-IO Spain study, which included 1,500 PwO and 306 HCP, was performed to identify differences in PwQ and HCPs belonging to regions with high prevalence of obesity (>16%, n = 9 regions, high prevalence of obesity [HPO] group) and low prevalence of obesity (<16%, n = 8 regions, low prevalence of obesity [LPO] group) (self-reported data), according to the 2017 National Health Survey of Spain.

Statistics: comparison of proportions (χ2).

Results: A total of 746 PwO belonged to HPO and 754 to LPO group. The PwO in HPO group were younger, had lower income, a lower level of higher education, higher unemployment rate, and fewer comorbidities. Obesity was considered a chronic disease to a higher extent in HPO compared to LPO group (62 vs. 56%), but this difference was not statistically significant. The PwO in HPO group discussed less with the HCPs about their excess weight (57 vs. 70%), did not feel motivated to lose weight in a higher percentage (26 vs. 18%), and felt less emotionally supported (16 vs. 24%). In HPO group, the preference for unhealthy food (51 vs. 36%), and the costs of healthy eating, anti-obesity drugs and bariatric surgery were perceived barriers to losing weight. A higher proportion of PwO in HPO group considered that exercise (58 vs. 40%) was more effective for achieving weight loss. In contrast, LPO group considered diet more effective (48 vs. 32%). HCPs in HPO group felt more motivated to treat obesity (83 vs. 68%) and a higher proportion (14 vs. 5%) identified the economic burden as one of the main reasons why PwO do not start conversations to lose weight.

Conclusions: There is less concern and conversation about excess weight in PwO in regions with a higher prevalence of obesity, with socioeconomic limitations being one of the main perceived barriers to treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西班牙不同地区的肥胖症发病率是否影响人们对肥胖症治疗的态度、看法和障碍?
导言:西班牙不同地区的肥胖症发病率存在差异,部分原因是社会经济差异,这种差异可能会影响治疗肥胖症的方法。本研究旨在比较西班牙不同地区的肥胖症患者(PwO)和医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)在治疗肥胖症的态度、认知和障碍方面的差异:西班牙 ACTION-IO 研究的子分析,该研究包括 1,500 名肥胖症患者和 306 名医护人员,分别属于肥胖症高发地区(>16% n=9 个地区,肥胖症患者组)和肥胖症低发地区(统计:比例比较 (Chi2))。只有具有统计学意义的结果(pResults:共有 746 名残疾人属于 HPO 组,754 名属于 LPO 组。HPO 组的患者年龄较轻、收入较低、受教育程度较低、失业率较高且合并症较少。与 LPO 组相比,HPO 组的肥胖症被视为慢性疾病的比例更高(62% 对 56%),但这一差异在统计上并不显著。肥胖症患者组的患者与保健医生讨论体重超标问题的比例较低(57% 对 70%),没有减肥动力的比例较高(26% 对 18%),感觉得到的情感支持较少(16% 对 24%)。在 HPO 组中,偏爱不健康食物(51% 对 36%)以及健康饮食、抗肥胖药物和减肥手术的费用是减肥的障碍。在 HPO 组中,有较高比例的 PwO 认为运动(58% 对 40%)对减肥更有效。相比之下,LPO 组认为饮食更有效(48% 对 32%)。HPO组的保健医生认为治疗肥胖症更有动力(83%对68%),而更高比例的保健医生(14%对5%)认为经济负担是患者不开始减肥谈话的主要原因之一:结论:在肥胖症发病率较高的地区,对体重超标的关注和谈话较少,社会经济限制是治疗的主要障碍之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Facts
Obesity Facts 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Obesity Facts'' publishes articles covering all aspects of obesity, in particular epidemiology, etiology and pathogenesis, treatment, and the prevention of adiposity. As obesity is related to many disease processes, the journal is also dedicated to all topics pertaining to comorbidity and covers psychological and sociocultural aspects as well as influences of nutrition and exercise on body weight. The editors carefully select papers to present only the most recent findings in clinical practice and research. All professionals concerned with obesity issues will find this journal a most valuable update to keep them abreast of the latest scientific developments.
期刊最新文献
The One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass is a suitable alternative to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in patients with BMI > 50 kg/m2 : a propensity-score matched analysis. Omentin increases glucose uptake, but not insulin sensitivity in human myotubes dependent on extracellular lactotransferrin. Burden of disease and cost of illness of overweight and obesity in Portugal. European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO) Position Statement on Medical Nutrition Therapy for the Management of Individuals with Overweight or Obesity and Cancer. Association between Obesity and Dental Caries in Adults: An Analysis of WHR, and DMFT Score.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1