Uptake rate of carrier screening among consanguineous couples.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Prenatal Diagnosis Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1002/pd.6556
Julianne Ricca, Justin S Brandt, Natalie Jacob, Elena Ashkinadze
{"title":"Uptake rate of carrier screening among consanguineous couples.","authors":"Julianne Ricca, Justin S Brandt, Natalie Jacob, Elena Ashkinadze","doi":"10.1002/pd.6556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify the uptake rates of Carrier Screening (CS) in consanguineous couples and compare this rate to that of non-consanguineous couples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a matched case control study of 82 consanguineous couples seen at Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical school who were offered carrier screening between January 1, 2012 and October 10, 2022. We then matched each consanguineous female patient to a non-consanguineous female control patient who was also offered CS at the time of their genetic counseling appointment. A 2 × 2 contingency table analysis was used to compare rates of acceptance and declination between the consanguineous and non-consanguineous groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall acceptance rate among consanguineous couples was 82.9%, whereas the overall acceptance rate among non-consanguineous couples was 56.1%. After statistical analysis, consanguineous couples were significantly more likely to accept CS as compared to non-consanguineous couples (OR = 3.801, 95% CI; p < 0.0001). We also report the carrier couple rates and individual carrier statistics between these two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study supports the idea that consanguineous couples are more likely to pursue CS and have a higher carrier couple yield.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"1470-1478"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6556","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To quantify the uptake rates of Carrier Screening (CS) in consanguineous couples and compare this rate to that of non-consanguineous couples.

Methods: We performed a matched case control study of 82 consanguineous couples seen at Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical school who were offered carrier screening between January 1, 2012 and October 10, 2022. We then matched each consanguineous female patient to a non-consanguineous female control patient who was also offered CS at the time of their genetic counseling appointment. A 2 × 2 contingency table analysis was used to compare rates of acceptance and declination between the consanguineous and non-consanguineous groups.

Results: The overall acceptance rate among consanguineous couples was 82.9%, whereas the overall acceptance rate among non-consanguineous couples was 56.1%. After statistical analysis, consanguineous couples were significantly more likely to accept CS as compared to non-consanguineous couples (OR = 3.801, 95% CI; p < 0.0001). We also report the carrier couple rates and individual carrier statistics between these two groups.

Conclusion: This study supports the idea that consanguineous couples are more likely to pursue CS and have a higher carrier couple yield.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
近亲结婚夫妇接受携带者筛查的比例。
目的量化近亲夫妇接受携带者筛查(CS)的比率,并将这一比率与非近亲夫妇进行比较:我们对 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 10 月 10 日期间在罗格斯-罗伯特-伍德-约翰逊医学院就诊的 82 对近亲结婚夫妇进行了匹配病例对照研究。然后,我们将每位近亲结婚的女性患者与非近亲结婚的女性对照患者进行配对,后者在预约遗传咨询时也接受了携带者筛查。我们使用 2 × 2 或然率表分析来比较近亲结婚组和非近亲结婚组之间的接受率和拒绝率:结果:近亲夫妇的总体接受率为 82.9%,而非近亲夫妇的总体接受率为 56.1%。经过统计分析,近亲结婚夫妇接受 CS 的可能性明显高于非近亲结婚夫妇(OR = 3.801,95% CI;P 结论:本研究支持近亲结婚夫妇接受 CS 的可能性高于非近亲结婚夫妇的观点:本研究支持这样的观点,即近亲结婚的夫妇更有可能接受 CS,而且其携带者夫妇的比例也更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
204
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling
期刊最新文献
Chromosomal Aberrations in Fetuses With Isolated Persistent Right Umbilical Vein-A Nationwide Study. Advances in Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Screening for Dominant Monogenic Conditions: A Review of Current Progress and Future Directions in Clinical Implementation. Making Sense of a Prenatal Detection of Trisomy 16 Mosaicism in the Placenta: A Qualitative Study of Pregnant Women's Decision Making. Outcomes of Intrauterine Interventions in Twin Reversed Arterial Perfusion (TRAP) Sequence: A Systematic Review of the Literature Over the Past 35 Years. Prenatal Diagnosis of Caroli's Disease by Ultrasound and MRI Imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1