The Problem of Pain in Lupus: Epidemiological Profiles of Patients Attending Multidisciplinary Pain Clinics

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pain Management Nursing Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pmn.2024.02.012
Tiffany E. Jiang MS , Alissa P. Pascual , Nathan Le , Thy B. Nguyen MS , Sean Mackey MD, PhD , Beth D. Darnall PhD , Julia F. Simard ScD , Titilola Falasinnu PhD
{"title":"The Problem of Pain in Lupus: Epidemiological Profiles of Patients Attending Multidisciplinary Pain Clinics","authors":"Tiffany E. Jiang MS ,&nbsp;Alissa P. Pascual ,&nbsp;Nathan Le ,&nbsp;Thy B. Nguyen MS ,&nbsp;Sean Mackey MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Beth D. Darnall PhD ,&nbsp;Julia F. Simard ScD ,&nbsp;Titilola Falasinnu PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) bear a significant burden of pain. We aimed to identify factors that distinguish patients with SLE referred to comprehensive pain clinics and those who are not. Characterizing this patient population will identify unmet needs in SLE management and inform efforts to improve pain care in rheumatology.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Among patients with SLE with ≥2 rheumatology clinic visits in a large hospital system from 1998 to 2023 (<em>n</em> = 1319), we examined factors that distinguished those who had at least one visit to multidisciplinary pain clinics (<em>n</em> = 77, 5.8%) from those who did not have any visits (<em>n</em> = 1242, 94.2%) with a focus on biopsychosocial and socioeconomic characteristics. We extracted demographic data and ICD-9/ICD-10 codes from the EHR.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients with SLE attending the pain clinics exhibited characteristics including average older age (mean age ± SD: 54.1 ± 17.9 vs. 48.4 ± 19.9), a higher likelihood of relying on public health insurance (50.7% vs. 34.2%), and a greater representation of Black patients (9.1% vs. 4.4%) compared to SLE patients not seen in pain clinics. Nearly all patients seen at the pain clinics presented with at least one chronic overlapping pain condition (96.1% vs. 58.6%), demonstrated a higher likelihood of having a mental health diagnosis (76.7% vs. 42.4%), and exhibited a greater number of comorbidities (mean ± SD: 6.0 ± 3.0 vs. 2.9 ± 2.6) compared to those not attending the pain clinic.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We found notable sociodemographic and clinical differences between these patient populations. Patients presenting with multiple comorbidities might benefit from further pain screening and referral to pain clinics to provide comprehensive care, and earlier referral could mitigate the development and progression of multimorbidities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":"25 3","pages":"Pages e209-e213"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904224000213","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) bear a significant burden of pain. We aimed to identify factors that distinguish patients with SLE referred to comprehensive pain clinics and those who are not. Characterizing this patient population will identify unmet needs in SLE management and inform efforts to improve pain care in rheumatology.

Methods

Among patients with SLE with ≥2 rheumatology clinic visits in a large hospital system from 1998 to 2023 (n = 1319), we examined factors that distinguished those who had at least one visit to multidisciplinary pain clinics (n = 77, 5.8%) from those who did not have any visits (n = 1242, 94.2%) with a focus on biopsychosocial and socioeconomic characteristics. We extracted demographic data and ICD-9/ICD-10 codes from the EHR.

Results

Patients with SLE attending the pain clinics exhibited characteristics including average older age (mean age ± SD: 54.1 ± 17.9 vs. 48.4 ± 19.9), a higher likelihood of relying on public health insurance (50.7% vs. 34.2%), and a greater representation of Black patients (9.1% vs. 4.4%) compared to SLE patients not seen in pain clinics. Nearly all patients seen at the pain clinics presented with at least one chronic overlapping pain condition (96.1% vs. 58.6%), demonstrated a higher likelihood of having a mental health diagnosis (76.7% vs. 42.4%), and exhibited a greater number of comorbidities (mean ± SD: 6.0 ± 3.0 vs. 2.9 ± 2.6) compared to those not attending the pain clinic.

Conclusion

We found notable sociodemographic and clinical differences between these patient populations. Patients presenting with multiple comorbidities might benefit from further pain screening and referral to pain clinics to provide comprehensive care, and earlier referral could mitigate the development and progression of multimorbidities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
红斑狼疮的疼痛问题:多学科疼痛门诊就诊患者的流行病学特征。
导言:系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者承受着巨大的疼痛负担。我们旨在找出将系统性红斑狼疮患者转诊到综合疼痛门诊和未转诊到综合疼痛门诊的区别因素。了解这一患者群体的特征将能发现系统性红斑狼疮治疗中尚未满足的需求,并为改善风湿病学中的疼痛治疗提供依据:从 1998 年到 2023 年,在一家大型医院系统的风湿病门诊就诊次数≥2 次的系统性红斑狼疮患者(n = 1319)中,我们研究了将至少有一次就诊于多学科疼痛门诊的患者(n = 77,5.8%)与未就诊的患者(n = 1242,94.2%)区分开来的因素,重点关注生物心理社会和社会经济特征。我们从电子病历中提取了人口统计学数据和 ICD-9/ICD-10 编码:结果:与不在疼痛诊所就诊的系统性红斑狼疮患者相比,在疼痛诊所就诊的系统性红斑狼疮患者表现出平均年龄较大(平均年龄± SD:54.1 ± 17.9 vs. 48.4 ± 19.9)、更有可能依靠公共医疗保险(50.7% vs. 34.2%)以及黑人患者比例较高(9.1% vs. 4.4%)等特点。与未在疼痛诊所就诊的患者相比,几乎所有在疼痛诊所就诊的患者都患有至少一种慢性重叠性疼痛(96.1% 对 58.6%),被诊断患有精神疾病的可能性更高(76.7% 对 42.4%),合并症的数量也更多(平均值 ± SD:6.0 ± 3.0 对 2.9 ± 2.6):结论:我们发现这些患者群体之间存在明显的社会人口学和临床差异。进一步的疼痛筛查和转诊到疼痛门诊以提供全面护理可能会使患有多种并发症的患者受益,而更早的转诊可减轻多发病的发展和恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
期刊最新文献
Effect of a Self-Efficacy-Promoting Program on Pain Management Among Patients with Cancer: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Concept Analysis of Moral Distress in Pain Management. Patient Experience of Pain Management Following Cardiac Surgery: A Mixed Methods Study. Disparities, Inequities, and Injustices in Populations With Pain: An ASPMN Position Statement. Use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in Labor Pain: An Integrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1