Associations between cognitive test scores and pain tolerance: The Tromsø study.

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-03-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2023-0082
Tonje Anita Melum, Ólöf A Steingrímsdóttir, Henrik B Jacobsen, Bente Johnsen, Audun Stubhaug, Henrik Schirmer, Ellisiv B Mathiesen, Christopher S Nielsen
{"title":"Associations between cognitive test scores and pain tolerance: The Tromsø study.","authors":"Tonje Anita Melum, Ólöf A Steingrímsdóttir, Henrik B Jacobsen, Bente Johnsen, Audun Stubhaug, Henrik Schirmer, Ellisiv B Mathiesen, Christopher S Nielsen","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2023-0082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Previous studies have suggested that experimental pain sensitivity is associated with cognitive function. The aim of this study is to assess this relationship in a large population-based sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 5,753 participants (aged 40-84 years) from the seventh wave of the population-based Tromsø Study who had been examined with cognitive tests and experimental pain assessments, and for whom information on covariates were available. Cox regression models were fitted using standardized scores on cognitive tests (12-word immediate recall test, digit symbol coding test, and Mini-Mental State Examination [MMS-E]) as the independent variable and cold pressor or cuff pressure pain tolerance as the dependent variables. Statistical adjustment was made for putative confounders, namely, age, sex, education, smoking, exercise, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, symptoms indicating anxiety or depression, analgesic use, and chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In multivariate analysis, cold pressor tolerance time was significantly associated with test scores on the 12-word immediate recall test (hazard ratio [HR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-0.97, <i>p</i> < 0.001), the digit symbol coding test (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.98, <i>p</i> = 0.004), and the MMS-E (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.90-0.96 <i>p</i> < 0.001). Tolerance to cuff pressure algometry was significantly associated with 12-word immediate recall (HR 0.94-0.97, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and Digit Symbol Coding test scores (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89-0.96, <i>p</i> < 0.001) while there was no significant association with Mini Mental State Examination test score (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.00, <i>p</i> = 0.082).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lower pain tolerance was associated with poorer performance on cognitive tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2023-0082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Previous studies have suggested that experimental pain sensitivity is associated with cognitive function. The aim of this study is to assess this relationship in a large population-based sample.

Methods: We included 5,753 participants (aged 40-84 years) from the seventh wave of the population-based Tromsø Study who had been examined with cognitive tests and experimental pain assessments, and for whom information on covariates were available. Cox regression models were fitted using standardized scores on cognitive tests (12-word immediate recall test, digit symbol coding test, and Mini-Mental State Examination [MMS-E]) as the independent variable and cold pressor or cuff pressure pain tolerance as the dependent variables. Statistical adjustment was made for putative confounders, namely, age, sex, education, smoking, exercise, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, symptoms indicating anxiety or depression, analgesic use, and chronic pain.

Results: In multivariate analysis, cold pressor tolerance time was significantly associated with test scores on the 12-word immediate recall test (hazard ratio [HR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-0.97, p < 0.001), the digit symbol coding test (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.98, p = 0.004), and the MMS-E (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.90-0.96 p < 0.001). Tolerance to cuff pressure algometry was significantly associated with 12-word immediate recall (HR 0.94-0.97, p < 0.001) and Digit Symbol Coding test scores (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89-0.96, p < 0.001) while there was no significant association with Mini Mental State Examination test score (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.00, p = 0.082).

Conclusion: Lower pain tolerance was associated with poorer performance on cognitive tests.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知测试分数与疼痛耐受力之间的关系:特罗姆瑟研究
研究目的以往的研究表明,实验性疼痛敏感性与认知功能有关。本研究的目的是在一个大样本人群中评估这种关系:我们纳入了特罗姆瑟人口研究第七次调查中的 5753 名参与者(年龄在 40-84 岁之间),他们都接受过认知测试和实验性疼痛评估,并提供了协变量信息。以认知测试(12 个单词即时回忆测试、数字符号编码测试和迷你精神状态检查 [MMS-E])的标准化分数为自变量,以冷压器或袖套压力疼痛耐受性为因变量,拟合了 Cox 回归模型。对假定的混杂因素,即年龄、性别、教育程度、吸烟、运动、收缩压、体重指数、焦虑或抑郁症状、镇痛剂的使用和慢性疼痛,进行了统计调整:在多变量分析中,冷压耐受时间与 12 个单词即时回忆测试得分(危险比 [HR] 0.93,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.90-0.97,p < 0.001)、数字符号编码测试(HR 0.94,95% CI 0.89-0.98,p = 0.004)和 MMS-E 测试(HR 0.93,95% CI 0.90-0.96 p < 0.001)显著相关。对袖带压力算法的耐受性与12个单词的即时回忆(HR 0.94-0.97,p < 0.001)和数字符号编码测试得分(HR 0.93,95% CI 0.89-0.96,p < 0.001)显著相关,而与迷你精神状态检查测试得分(HR 0.98,95% CI 0.95-1.00,p = 0.082)无显著相关:结论:疼痛耐受力较低与认知测试成绩较差有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
期刊最新文献
Neck and shoulder pain and inflammatory biomarkers in plasma among forklift truck operators - A case-control study. A positive scratch collapse test in anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome indicates its neuropathic character. Real-world evidence evaluation on consumer experience and prescription journey of diclofenac gel in Sweden. Differences in risk factors for flare-ups in patients with lumbar radicular pain may depend on the definition of flare. The "future" pain clinician: Competencies needed to provide psychologically informed care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1