"Breaking the Silence" Suicide Prevention Media Campaign in Oregon, April 7-14, 2019.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1027/0227-5910/a000955
Thomas Niederkrotenthaler, Hannah Metzler, Zrinka Laido, Benedikt Till, Alison H Lake, Emily Noble, Saba Chowdhury, Frances Gonzalez, David Garcia, John Draper, Sean Murphy, Madelyn Gould
{"title":"\"Breaking the Silence\" Suicide Prevention Media Campaign in Oregon, April 7-14, 2019.","authors":"Thomas Niederkrotenthaler, Hannah Metzler, Zrinka Laido, Benedikt Till, Alison H Lake, Emily Noble, Saba Chowdhury, Frances Gonzalez, David Garcia, John Draper, Sean Murphy, Madelyn Gould","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background</i>: Between April 7 and 14, 2019, the \"Breaking the Silence\" media engagement campaign was launched in Oregon. <i>Aims:</i> We aimed to assess the consistency of media content related to the campaign with media guidelines and the quantitative footprint on Twitter (now X) over time. <i>Method:</i> Media items related to the campaign were analyzed regarding focus and consistency with media guidelines for suicide reporting and compared with other suicide-related reports published in the same time frame, as well as with reporting in Washington, the control region. Tweets related to the campaign were retrieved to assess the social media footprint. <i>Results:</i> There were <i>n</i> = 104 media items in the campaign month, mainly in the campaign week. Items typically used a narrative featuring suicide advocacy or policy/prevention programs. As compared to other items with a similar focus, they scored better on several protective characteristics listed in media recommendations. Stories of coping with adversity, however, were scarce. The social media footprint on Twitter was small. <i>Limitations:</i> Inability to make causal claims about campaign impact. <i>Conclusion:</i> Media items from the Breaking the Silence campaign appeared mainly consistent with media guidelines, but some aspects, such as stories of recovery, were under-represented.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"330-338"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000955","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Between April 7 and 14, 2019, the "Breaking the Silence" media engagement campaign was launched in Oregon. Aims: We aimed to assess the consistency of media content related to the campaign with media guidelines and the quantitative footprint on Twitter (now X) over time. Method: Media items related to the campaign were analyzed regarding focus and consistency with media guidelines for suicide reporting and compared with other suicide-related reports published in the same time frame, as well as with reporting in Washington, the control region. Tweets related to the campaign were retrieved to assess the social media footprint. Results: There were n = 104 media items in the campaign month, mainly in the campaign week. Items typically used a narrative featuring suicide advocacy or policy/prevention programs. As compared to other items with a similar focus, they scored better on several protective characteristics listed in media recommendations. Stories of coping with adversity, however, were scarce. The social media footprint on Twitter was small. Limitations: Inability to make causal claims about campaign impact. Conclusion: Media items from the Breaking the Silence campaign appeared mainly consistent with media guidelines, but some aspects, such as stories of recovery, were under-represented.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄勒冈州 "打破沉默 "预防自杀媒体宣传活动,2019 年 4 月 7-14 日。
背景:2019 年 4 月 7 日至 14 日,俄勒冈州发起了 "打破沉默 "媒体参与活动。目的:我们旨在评估与该活动相关的媒体内容与媒体指南的一致性,以及随着时间的推移在 Twitter(现在为 X)上的定量足迹。方法:我们分析了与该活动相关的媒体报道的重点以及与自杀报道媒体指南的一致性,并与同一时期发布的其他自杀相关报道以及对照地区华盛顿州的报道进行了比较。还检索了与该活动相关的推文,以评估社交媒体足迹。结果活动月共有 n = 104 个媒体项目,主要集中在活动周。这些项目通常以自杀宣传或政策/预防项目为主题。与关注点类似的其他项目相比,这些项目在媒体建议中列出的几个保护性特征方面得分较高。然而,应对逆境的故事却很少。推特上的社交媒体足迹很小。局限性:无法对活动的影响做出因果关系的判断。结论打破沉默 "活动的媒体项目主要符合媒体指南,但在某些方面,如康复故事的代表性不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: A must for all who need to keep up on the latest findings from both basic research and practical experience in the fields of suicide prevention and crisis intervention! This well-established periodical’s reputation for publishing important articles on suicidology and crisis intervention from around the world is being further enhanced with the move to 6 issues per year (previously 4) in 2010. But over and above its scientific reputation, Crisis also publishes potentially life-saving information for all those involved in crisis intervention and suicide prevention, making it important reading for clinicians, counselors, hotlines, and crisis intervention centers.
期刊最新文献
Perceived Effectiveness of Components of Interventions to Support People Bereaved By Suicide. Exploring the Influence of Masculine Norms on Suicidal Ideation and Help-Seeking Behavior. Substitution of Methods in Suicide Deaths - Firearm Injury and Hanging. Using Real-Time Coronial Data to Detect Spatiotemporal Suicide Clusters. Does Gender Predict Research Productivity? The Case of Prolific Suicidologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1