Preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment and multidisciplinary team input in older people undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery: A feasibility trial

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Australasian Journal on Ageing Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1111/ajag.13302
Anna Mearns, Amanda Tsan Yue Siu, Melisa Birdling, Thomas Geddes, Helen Kenealy
{"title":"Preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment and multidisciplinary team input in older people undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery: A feasibility trial","authors":"Anna Mearns,&nbsp;Amanda Tsan Yue Siu,&nbsp;Melisa Birdling,&nbsp;Thomas Geddes,&nbsp;Helen Kenealy","doi":"10.1111/ajag.13302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To determine the feasibility of preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and multidisciplinary team (MDT) input for older people undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery in a tertiary New Zealand setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This single-centre retrospective study included elective orthopaedic patients older than 65 years (and Māori/Pasifika aged greater than 55 years) with hyperpolypharmacy, frailty, neurocognitive disorders and poor functional status. Patients attended a preoperative clinic where they had a geriatrician-led CGA along with MDT input. The feasibility of this preoperative model was assessed using outcomes of acceptability, accessibility and adherence. A qualitative description of patient demographics along with clinic assessment and interventions further describes this pilot experience.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Sixty patients met inclusion criteria. This group were vulnerable older people (median age 77 years), with a high incidence of hyperpolypharmacy (85%), frailty (80%) and neurocognitive disorders (30%). Acceptability was high (97%), along with CGA accessibility (100%); however, MDT accessibility varied (53–90%). Adherence to MDT intervention was low; with only 26% of patients completing physiotherapy sessions and only 29% adhering to dietary advice. Accurate recall was a significant factor contributing to poor adherence. Comprehensive geriatric assessment was demonstrated to be a broad and flexible intervention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>CGA with MDT input is an acceptable and accessible intervention to be utilised as part of improved preoperative care for the older person undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery. Further consideration around methods to increase adherence in this patient group should be explored. Future research should focus on refining the intervention, and quantifying impact on patient outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55431,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","volume":"43 3","pages":"553-560"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajag.13302","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To determine the feasibility of preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and multidisciplinary team (MDT) input for older people undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery in a tertiary New Zealand setting.

Methods

This single-centre retrospective study included elective orthopaedic patients older than 65 years (and Māori/Pasifika aged greater than 55 years) with hyperpolypharmacy, frailty, neurocognitive disorders and poor functional status. Patients attended a preoperative clinic where they had a geriatrician-led CGA along with MDT input. The feasibility of this preoperative model was assessed using outcomes of acceptability, accessibility and adherence. A qualitative description of patient demographics along with clinic assessment and interventions further describes this pilot experience.

Results

Sixty patients met inclusion criteria. This group were vulnerable older people (median age 77 years), with a high incidence of hyperpolypharmacy (85%), frailty (80%) and neurocognitive disorders (30%). Acceptability was high (97%), along with CGA accessibility (100%); however, MDT accessibility varied (53–90%). Adherence to MDT intervention was low; with only 26% of patients completing physiotherapy sessions and only 29% adhering to dietary advice. Accurate recall was a significant factor contributing to poor adherence. Comprehensive geriatric assessment was demonstrated to be a broad and flexible intervention.

Conclusions

CGA with MDT input is an acceptable and accessible intervention to be utilised as part of improved preoperative care for the older person undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery. Further consideration around methods to increase adherence in this patient group should be explored. Future research should focus on refining the intervention, and quantifying impact on patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对接受择期骨科手术的老年人进行术前老年病综合评估和多学科团队参与:可行性试验。
目的确定在新西兰一家三级医院接受择期骨科手术的老年人术前综合老年评估(CGA)和多学科团队(MDT)投入的可行性:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了65岁以上(毛利人/帕西菲卡人55岁以上)、患有多药、虚弱、神经认知障碍和功能状况不佳的择期骨科患者。患者在术前门诊接受由老年病学专家主导的 CGA 治疗,并由医疗小组提供意见。这种术前模式的可行性通过可接受性、可及性和依从性等结果进行评估。对患者人口统计学、诊所评估和干预措施的定性描述进一步说明了这一试点经验:结果:60 名患者符合纳入标准。这些患者都是易受伤害的老年人(中位年龄 77 岁),多药(85%)、虚弱(80%)和神经认知障碍(30%)的发病率很高。他们对 CGA 的可接受性(97%)和可及性(100%)都很高;但对 MDT 的可及性却不尽相同(53%-90%)。坚持接受 MDT 干预的比例较低;只有 26% 的患者完成了物理治疗疗程,只有 29% 的患者坚持接受饮食建议。准确回忆是导致坚持率低的一个重要因素。综合老年评估被证明是一种广泛而灵活的干预措施:有多学科小组参与的 CGA 是一种可接受、可利用的干预措施,可作为改善接受择期骨科手术的老年人术前护理的一部分。应进一步考虑如何提高该患者群体的依从性。未来的研究应侧重于完善干预措施,并量化对患者预后的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Australasian Journal on Ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal on Ageing is a peer reviewed journal, which publishes original work in any area of gerontology and geriatric medicine. It welcomes international submissions, particularly from authors in the Asia Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Short-Term Restorative Care program: Effects on physical functioning. Knowledge of dementia: A cross-sectional survey of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community members and health-care workers providing care to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Food, nutrition and dining information on residential aged care facility websites: A website analysis. Need to develop a healthy ageing and fall prevention exercise program for older people with sarcopenia. Prospective association between social isolation, loneliness and lung function among Chinese middle-aged and older adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1