Does Overgrading on Targeted Biopsy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-visible Lesions in Prostate Cancer Lead to Overtreatment?

IF 25.3 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY European urology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2024.02.003
{"title":"Does Overgrading on Targeted Biopsy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-visible Lesions in Prostate Cancer Lead to Overtreatment?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.eururo.2024.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><p>Targeted biopsy of the index prostate cancer (PCa) lesion on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is effective in reducing the risk of overdiagnosis of indolent PCa. However, it remains to be determined whether MRI-targeted biopsy can lead to a stage shift via overgrading of the index lesion by focusing only on the highest-grade component, and to a subsequent risk of overtreatment. Our aim was to assess whether overgrading on MRI-targeted biopsy may lead to overtreatment, using radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens as the reference standard.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with clinically localized PCa who had positive MRI findings (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] score ≥3) and Gleason grade group (GG) ≥2 disease detected on MRI-targeted biopsy were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained database that records all RP procedures from eight referral centers. Biopsy grade was defined as the highest grade detected. Downgrading was defined as lower GG for the RP specimen than for MRI-targeted biopsy. Overtreatment was defined as downgrading to RP GG 1 for cases with GG ≥2 on biopsy, or to RP low-burden GG 2 for cases with GG ≥3 on biopsy.</p></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><p>We included 1020 consecutive biopsy-naïve patients with GG ≥2 PCa on MRI-targeted biopsy in the study. Pathological analysis of RP specimens showed downgrading in 178 patients (17%). The transperineal biopsy route was significantly associated with a lower risk of downgrading (odds ratio 0.364, 95% confidence interval 0.142–0.814; <em>p</em> = 0.022). Among 555 patients with GG 2 on targeted biopsy, only 18 (3.2%) were downgraded to GG 1 on RP. Among 465 patients with GG ≥3 on targeted biopsy, three (0.6%) were downgraded to GG 1 and seven were downgraded to low-burden GG 2 on RP. The overall risk of overtreatment due to targeted biopsy was 2.7% (28/1020).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><p>Our multicenter study revealed no strong evidence that targeted biopsy results could lead to a high risk of overtreatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12223,"journal":{"name":"European urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":25.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030228382400071X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

Targeted biopsy of the index prostate cancer (PCa) lesion on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is effective in reducing the risk of overdiagnosis of indolent PCa. However, it remains to be determined whether MRI-targeted biopsy can lead to a stage shift via overgrading of the index lesion by focusing only on the highest-grade component, and to a subsequent risk of overtreatment. Our aim was to assess whether overgrading on MRI-targeted biopsy may lead to overtreatment, using radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens as the reference standard.

Methods

Patients with clinically localized PCa who had positive MRI findings (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] score ≥3) and Gleason grade group (GG) ≥2 disease detected on MRI-targeted biopsy were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained database that records all RP procedures from eight referral centers. Biopsy grade was defined as the highest grade detected. Downgrading was defined as lower GG for the RP specimen than for MRI-targeted biopsy. Overtreatment was defined as downgrading to RP GG 1 for cases with GG ≥2 on biopsy, or to RP low-burden GG 2 for cases with GG ≥3 on biopsy.

Key findings and limitations

We included 1020 consecutive biopsy-naïve patients with GG ≥2 PCa on MRI-targeted biopsy in the study. Pathological analysis of RP specimens showed downgrading in 178 patients (17%). The transperineal biopsy route was significantly associated with a lower risk of downgrading (odds ratio 0.364, 95% confidence interval 0.142–0.814; p = 0.022). Among 555 patients with GG 2 on targeted biopsy, only 18 (3.2%) were downgraded to GG 1 on RP. Among 465 patients with GG ≥3 on targeted biopsy, three (0.6%) were downgraded to GG 1 and seven were downgraded to low-burden GG 2 on RP. The overall risk of overtreatment due to targeted biopsy was 2.7% (28/1020).

Conclusions and clinical implications

Our multicenter study revealed no strong evidence that targeted biopsy results could lead to a high risk of overtreatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对前列腺癌磁共振成像可见病灶进行靶向活检是否会导致过度治疗?
背景和目的:对多参数磁共振成像(MRI)显示的前列腺癌(PCa)病灶进行靶向活检,可有效降低轻度PCa的过度诊断风险。然而,磁共振成像靶向活检是否会导致分期转移,即只关注最高分级的病变,从而导致分级过高,进而导致过度治疗的风险,这一点仍有待确定。我们的目的是以根治性前列腺切除术(RP)标本为参考标准,评估MRI靶向活检是否会导致过度治疗:从记录了八个转诊中心所有前列腺癌根治术(RP)过程的前瞻性数据库中回顾性地确定了MRI检查结果呈阳性(前列腺成像报告和数据系统[PI-RADS]评分≥3分)且MRI靶向活检发现的Gleason分级组(GG)≥2的临床局部PCa患者。活检级别定义为检测到的最高级别。RP标本的GG低于MRI靶向活检的GG,即为降级。过度治疗的定义是活检GG≥2的病例降级为RP GG 1,或活检GG≥3的病例降级为RP低负担GG 2:我们连续纳入了1020例经磁共振靶向活检GG≥2的未经活检的PCa患者。对RP标本的病理分析显示,178名患者(17%)的病理指标下降。经会阴活检途径与较低的降级风险显著相关(几率比 0.364,95% 置信区间 0.142-0.814;P = 0.022)。在靶向活检的 555 例 GG 2 患者中,只有 18 例(3.2%)在 RP 时降级为 GG 1。在靶向活检结果为 GG≥3 的 465 例患者中,有 3 例(0.6%)降级为 GG 1,7 例降级为低负担 GG 2。靶向活检导致过度治疗的总体风险为2.7%(28/1020):患者总结:在前列腺癌的诊断路径中,由磁共振成像(MRI)扫描引导的靶向活检结果导致的过度治疗比例微乎其微。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European urology
European urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
43.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1753
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original articles and reviews on a broad spectrum of urological issues. Covering topics such as oncology, impotence, infertility, pediatrics, lithiasis and endourology, the journal also highlights recent advances in techniques, instrumentation, surgery, and pediatric urology. This comprehensive approach provides readers with an in-depth guide to international developments in urology.
期刊最新文献
First and Second-line Treatments in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Re: Maarten De Rooij, Clare Allen, Jasper J. Twilt, et al. PI-QUAL Version 2: An Update of a Standardised Scoring System for the Assessment of Image Quality of Prostate MRI. Eur Radiol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10795-4 Challenges and Considerations in Modern Adjuvant Therapy Trials in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Call to Power Best Practice in Using Social Media: The European Association of Urology Position Statement What’s in a Name? Why Words Matter in Advanced Prostate Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1