Using mobile device built-in microphones to monitor bats: a new opportunity for large-scale participatory science initiatives

IF 3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Biodiversity and Conservation Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1007/s10531-024-02818-9
Fabrizio Gili, Sandro Bertolino, Antonio Rolando
{"title":"Using mobile device built-in microphones to monitor bats: a new opportunity for large-scale participatory science initiatives","authors":"Fabrizio Gili, Sandro Bertolino, Antonio Rolando","doi":"10.1007/s10531-024-02818-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Citizen science has become a crucial tool in biodiversity monitoring, often facilitated by the diffusion of mobile devices, such as smartphones and tablets. High costs of professional equipment often limit large-scale monitoring, particularly in bat monitoring programmes based on acoustic surveys. Here we present the potential of using mobile devices for bat monitoring, allowing for large-scale, volunteer-based monitoring programmes. We initially compared mobile devices’ performance with a professional bat detector for recording low-frequency bat calls. We then conducted a citizen science pilot study to test the method’s feasibility in a real-world setting, recording echolocation and social calls of nine European bat species. We found high similarity in spectrogram quality (0.74 ± 0.09 for Samsung, 0.90 ± 0.01 for Huawei, 0.86 ± 0.09 for Xiaomi, 0.69 ± 0.09 for Apple) and average peak frequency (differences of 0.2 ± 0.5 kHz for Samsung, 0.1 ± 0.7 kHz for Huawei, 0.5 ± 1.0 kHz for Xiaomi, 0.1 ± 0.8 kHz for Apple) between calls recorded by mobile devices and professional bat detectors. The number of recorded bat calls per sampling session was also similar. However, differences in sound quality and effectiveness among mobile device brands were found. iOS devices outperformed professional detectors at recording bat calls at increasing distances. The citizen science pilot study tested 35 mobile device models, all of which effectively recorded bats. This study suggests that mobile devices could be an accessible, no-cost tool for large-scale bat monitoring. Incorporating mobile devices into existing monitoring networks or creating new dedicated programmes could not only enhance data collection, but also boost public knowledge and awareness about bats, ultimately promoting informed decision-making and better conservation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8843,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity and Conservation","volume":"149 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodiversity and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02818-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Citizen science has become a crucial tool in biodiversity monitoring, often facilitated by the diffusion of mobile devices, such as smartphones and tablets. High costs of professional equipment often limit large-scale monitoring, particularly in bat monitoring programmes based on acoustic surveys. Here we present the potential of using mobile devices for bat monitoring, allowing for large-scale, volunteer-based monitoring programmes. We initially compared mobile devices’ performance with a professional bat detector for recording low-frequency bat calls. We then conducted a citizen science pilot study to test the method’s feasibility in a real-world setting, recording echolocation and social calls of nine European bat species. We found high similarity in spectrogram quality (0.74 ± 0.09 for Samsung, 0.90 ± 0.01 for Huawei, 0.86 ± 0.09 for Xiaomi, 0.69 ± 0.09 for Apple) and average peak frequency (differences of 0.2 ± 0.5 kHz for Samsung, 0.1 ± 0.7 kHz for Huawei, 0.5 ± 1.0 kHz for Xiaomi, 0.1 ± 0.8 kHz for Apple) between calls recorded by mobile devices and professional bat detectors. The number of recorded bat calls per sampling session was also similar. However, differences in sound quality and effectiveness among mobile device brands were found. iOS devices outperformed professional detectors at recording bat calls at increasing distances. The citizen science pilot study tested 35 mobile device models, all of which effectively recorded bats. This study suggests that mobile devices could be an accessible, no-cost tool for large-scale bat monitoring. Incorporating mobile devices into existing monitoring networks or creating new dedicated programmes could not only enhance data collection, but also boost public knowledge and awareness about bats, ultimately promoting informed decision-making and better conservation strategies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用移动设备内置麦克风监测蝙蝠:大规模参与性科学活动的新机遇
公民科学已成为生物多样性监测的重要工具,智能手机和平板电脑等移动设备的普及往往为其提供了便利。专业设备的高昂成本往往限制了大规模监测,特别是在基于声学调查的蝙蝠监测计划中。在此,我们介绍了使用移动设备进行蝙蝠监测的潜力,从而可以开展大规模的、以志愿者为基础的监测计划。我们首先比较了移动设备与专业蝙蝠探测器在记录低频蝙蝠叫声方面的性能。然后,我们进行了一项公民科学试点研究,以测试该方法在实际环境中的可行性,记录了九种欧洲蝙蝠的回声定位和社会性叫声。我们发现,移动设备和专业蝙蝠探测器记录的蝙蝠叫声在频谱图质量(三星为 0.74 ± 0.09,华为为 0.90 ± 0.01,小米为 0.86 ± 0.09,苹果为 0.69 ± 0.09)和平均峰值频率(三星为 0.2 ± 0.5 kHz,华为为 0.1 ± 0.7 kHz,小米为 0.5 ± 1.0 kHz,苹果为 0.1 ± 0.8 kHz)方面具有高度相似性。每次采样记录的蝙蝠叫声数量也相似。iOS 设备在记录距离增加时的蝙蝠叫声方面优于专业探测器。公民科学试点研究测试了 35 种型号的移动设备,所有这些设备都能有效记录蝙蝠的叫声。这项研究表明,移动设备可以成为大规模蝙蝠监测的一种便捷、无成本的工具。将移动设备纳入现有的监测网络或创建新的专门计划,不仅能加强数据收集,还能提高公众对蝙蝠的了解和认识,最终促进知情决策和更好的保护战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biodiversity and Conservation
Biodiversity and Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
153
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: Biodiversity and Conservation is an international journal that publishes articles on all aspects of biological diversity-its description, analysis and conservation, and its controlled rational use by humankind. The scope of Biodiversity and Conservation is wide and multidisciplinary, and embraces all life-forms. The journal presents research papers, as well as editorials, comments and research notes on biodiversity and conservation, and contributions dealing with the practicalities of conservation management, economic, social and political issues. The journal provides a forum for examining conflicts between sustainable development and human dependence on biodiversity in agriculture, environmental management and biotechnology, and encourages contributions from developing countries to promote broad global perspectives on matters of biodiversity and conservation.
期刊最新文献
An assessment of the implementation of the EU policy for conservation varieties from 2009 to 2023 and its relationship to Geographical Indications The iconic Jubaea chilensis teeters on the edge of local extinction: a plea for enhanced conservation policies High site fidelity and reduced survival of a mycophagous mammal after prescribed fire An assessment of liverwort richness, endemicity and conservation in a megadiverse country - Colombia Wilderness areas maintain mammal assemblage in subtropical mountain forests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1