Textbooks as Markers and Makers of International Law: A Brazilian Case Study

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS European Journal of International Law Pub Date : 2024-03-14 DOI:10.1093/ejil/chae007
Luíza Leão Soares Pereira, Fabio Costa Morosini
{"title":"Textbooks as Markers and Makers of International Law: A Brazilian Case Study","authors":"Luíza Leão Soares Pereira, Fabio Costa Morosini","doi":"10.1093/ejil/chae007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article challenges conventional views of international law textbooks as mere instructional tools and explores them as powerful sites for shaping knowledge and the discipline. Drawing on empirical methods and critical theory, we analyse the 10 main international law textbooks used in Brazil and conduct interviews with their authors to illuminate the textbooks’ complexities and their potential for shaping the discipline and the profession. The article delves into the tension between the structure of international law as depicted in the textbooks and the agency of their authors, investigating the authors’ identities and backgrounds. Brazil serves as a compelling case study due to its numerous international law textbooks and their widespread use. Our results indicate a predominant universalist approach in Brazilian textbooks and their connection to the French international law tradition. Moreover, the study sheds light on the Brazilian ‘invisible college’ of international lawyers, revealing gender and racial disparities and institutional centralities. It also uncovers crucial omissions in the textbooks, such as the relationship of international law to colonialism, slavery, race, gender and economic inequality. Overall, this study offers a comprehensive understanding of international law as a field in Brazil and provides a valuable methodological framework for future research on textbooks’ role in shaping the discipline.","PeriodicalId":47727,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of International Law","volume":"390 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chae007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article challenges conventional views of international law textbooks as mere instructional tools and explores them as powerful sites for shaping knowledge and the discipline. Drawing on empirical methods and critical theory, we analyse the 10 main international law textbooks used in Brazil and conduct interviews with their authors to illuminate the textbooks’ complexities and their potential for shaping the discipline and the profession. The article delves into the tension between the structure of international law as depicted in the textbooks and the agency of their authors, investigating the authors’ identities and backgrounds. Brazil serves as a compelling case study due to its numerous international law textbooks and their widespread use. Our results indicate a predominant universalist approach in Brazilian textbooks and their connection to the French international law tradition. Moreover, the study sheds light on the Brazilian ‘invisible college’ of international lawyers, revealing gender and racial disparities and institutional centralities. It also uncovers crucial omissions in the textbooks, such as the relationship of international law to colonialism, slavery, race, gender and economic inequality. Overall, this study offers a comprehensive understanding of international law as a field in Brazil and provides a valuable methodological framework for future research on textbooks’ role in shaping the discipline.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教科书是国际法的标记和制定者:巴西案例研究
本文挑战了将国际法教科书仅仅视为教学工具的传统观点,将其视为塑造知识和学科的有力场所。利用实证方法和批判理论,我们分析了巴西使用的 10 种主要国际法教科书,并对其作者进行了访谈,以揭示教科书的复杂性及其塑造学科和专业的潜力。文章深入探讨了教科书中描述的国际法结构与作者的能动性之间的矛盾,调查了作者的身份和背景。巴西的国际法教科书数量众多,使用广泛,因此是一个令人信服的案例研究对象。我们的研究结果表明,巴西教科书中的普遍主义方法占主导地位,并与法国国际法传统有关。此外,本研究还揭示了巴西国际法学家的 "隐形学院",揭示了性别和种族差异以及机构中心。研究还发现了教科书中的重要遗漏,如国际法与殖民主义、奴隶制、种族、性别和经济不平等的关系。总之,本研究提供了对巴西国际法领域的全面了解,并为今后研究教科书在塑造该学科中的作用提供了宝贵的方法论框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The European Journal of International Law is firmly established as one of the world"s leading journals in its field. With its distinctive combination of theoretical and practical approaches to the issues of international law, the journal offers readers a unique opportunity to stay in touch with the latest developments in this rapidly evolving area. Each issue of the EJIL provides a forum for the exploration of the conceptual and theoretical dimensions of international law as well as for up-to-date analysis of topical issues. Additionally, it is the only journal to provide systematic coverage of the relationship between international law and the law of the European Union and its Member States.
期刊最新文献
The Progressive Development of International Law on the Return of Stolen Assets: Mapping the Paths Forward A Deeper Understanding of the Constitutional Status of Māori and Their Rights Required: A Reply to Christian Riffel Constitutional Law-making by International Law: The Indigenization of Free Trade Agreements Revisiting Röling and Cassese’s Appraisal of the Tokyo Tribunal Is Imitation Really Flattery? The UK’s Trade Continuity Agreements: A Reply to Joris Larik
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1