Comparison of surface-wave techniques to estimate S- and P-wave velocity models from active seismic data

IF 3.2 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Solid Earth Pub Date : 2024-03-14 DOI:10.5194/se-15-367-2024
Farbod Khosro Anjom, Frank Adler, Laura Valentina Socco
{"title":"Comparison of surface-wave techniques to estimate S- and P-wave velocity models from active seismic data","authors":"Farbod Khosro Anjom, Frank Adler, Laura Valentina Socco","doi":"10.5194/se-15-367-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The acquisition of seismic exploration data in remote locations presents several logistical and economic criticalities. The irregular distribution of sources and/or receivers facilitates seismic acquisition operations in these areas. A convenient approach is to deploy nodal receivers on a regular grid and to use sources only in accessible locations, creating an irregular source–receiver layout. It is essential to evaluate, adapt, and verify processing workflows, specifically for near-surface velocity model estimation using surface-wave analysis, when working with these types of datasets. In this study, we applied three surface-wave techniques (i.e., wavelength–depth (W/D) method, laterally constrained inversion (LCI), and surface-wave tomography (SWT)) to a large-scale 3D dataset obtained from a hard-rock site using the irregular source–receiver acquisition method. The methods were fine-tuned for the data obtained from hard-rock sites, which typically exhibit a low signal-to-noise ratio. The wavelength–depth method is a data transformation method that is based on a relationship between skin depth and surface-wave wavelength and provides both S- and P-wave velocity (Vs and Vp) models. We used Poisson's ratios estimated through the wavelength–depth method to constrain the laterally constrained inversion and surface-wave tomography and to retrieve both Vs and Vp also from these methods. The pseudo-3D Vs and Vp models were obtained down to 140 m depth over an area of approximately 900 × 1500 m2. The estimated models from the methods matched the geological information available for the site. A difference of less than 6 % was observed between the estimated Vs models from the three methods, whereas this value was 7.1 % for the retrieved Vp models. The methods were critically compared in terms of resolution and efficiency, which provides valuable insights into the potential of surface-wave analysis for estimating near-surface models at hard-rock sites.","PeriodicalId":21912,"journal":{"name":"Solid Earth","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-367-2024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. The acquisition of seismic exploration data in remote locations presents several logistical and economic criticalities. The irregular distribution of sources and/or receivers facilitates seismic acquisition operations in these areas. A convenient approach is to deploy nodal receivers on a regular grid and to use sources only in accessible locations, creating an irregular source–receiver layout. It is essential to evaluate, adapt, and verify processing workflows, specifically for near-surface velocity model estimation using surface-wave analysis, when working with these types of datasets. In this study, we applied three surface-wave techniques (i.e., wavelength–depth (W/D) method, laterally constrained inversion (LCI), and surface-wave tomography (SWT)) to a large-scale 3D dataset obtained from a hard-rock site using the irregular source–receiver acquisition method. The methods were fine-tuned for the data obtained from hard-rock sites, which typically exhibit a low signal-to-noise ratio. The wavelength–depth method is a data transformation method that is based on a relationship between skin depth and surface-wave wavelength and provides both S- and P-wave velocity (Vs and Vp) models. We used Poisson's ratios estimated through the wavelength–depth method to constrain the laterally constrained inversion and surface-wave tomography and to retrieve both Vs and Vp also from these methods. The pseudo-3D Vs and Vp models were obtained down to 140 m depth over an area of approximately 900 × 1500 m2. The estimated models from the methods matched the geological information available for the site. A difference of less than 6 % was observed between the estimated Vs models from the three methods, whereas this value was 7.1 % for the retrieved Vp models. The methods were critically compared in terms of resolution and efficiency, which provides valuable insights into the potential of surface-wave analysis for estimating near-surface models at hard-rock sites.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从活动地震数据估算 S 波和 P 波速度模型的面波技术比较
摘要在偏远地区采集地震勘探数据存在若干后勤和经济方面的关键问题。震源和/或接收器的不规则分布有利于这些地区的地震采集作业。一种方便的方法是在规则的网格上部署节点接收器,只在可到达的地点使用震源,形成不规则的震源-接收器布局。在处理这类数据集时,必须评估、调整和验证处理工作流程,特别是利用面波分析进行近地表速度模型估算的工作流程。在这项研究中,我们将三种面波技术(即波长-深度(W/D)法、横向约束反演(LCI)和面波层析成像(SWT))应用于采用不规则源-接收器采集方法从硬岩场地获得的大规模三维数据集。这些方法针对从硬岩地点获得的数据进行了微调,硬岩地点通常信噪比较低。波深法是一种数据转换方法,它基于表皮深度和表面波波长之间的关系,并提供 S 波和 P 波速度(Vs 和 Vp)模型。我们使用波长深度法估算的泊松比来约束横向约束反演和面波层析成像,并从这些方法中获取 Vs 和 Vp。在大约 900 × 1500 平方米的区域内,获得了深度达 140 米的伪三维 Vs 和 Vp 模型。这些方法估算出的模型与该地点现有的地质信息相吻合。三种方法估算的 Vs 模型之间的差异小于 6%,而检索的 Vp 模型之间的差异为 7.1%。这些方法在分辨率和效率方面进行了严格的比较,为了解面波分析在估算硬岩地点近地表模型方面的潜力提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Solid Earth
Solid Earth GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Solid Earth (SE) is a not-for-profit journal that publishes multidisciplinary research on the composition, structure, dynamics of the Earth from the surface to the deep interior at all spatial and temporal scales. The journal invites contributions encompassing observational, experimental, and theoretical investigations in the form of short communications, research articles, method articles, review articles, and discussion and commentaries on all aspects of the solid Earth (for details see manuscript types). Being interdisciplinary in scope, SE covers the following disciplines: geochemistry, mineralogy, petrology, volcanology; geodesy and gravity; geodynamics: numerical and analogue modeling of geoprocesses; geoelectrics and electromagnetics; geomagnetism; geomorphology, morphotectonics, and paleoseismology; rock physics; seismics and seismology; critical zone science (Earth''s permeable near-surface layer); stratigraphy, sedimentology, and palaeontology; rock deformation, structural geology, and tectonics.
期刊最新文献
Lithologically constrained velocity–density relationships and vertical stress gradients in the North Alpine Foreland Basin, SE Germany Anatomy of a fumarole field: drone remote-sensing and petrological approaches reveal the degassing and alteration structure at La Fossa cone, Vulcano, Italy Passive seismic imaging of ore deposits using coda wave interferometry: a case study of Akanvaara V-Cr-PGE deposit in Northern Finland Driven magmatism and crustal thinning of coastal southern China in response to subduction Magnesium isotope fractionation processes during seafloor serpentinization and implications for serpentinite subduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1