Recognising the rights of nature: How have the courts fared?

IF 1.4 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW European Law Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1111/eulj.12490
Tolulope N. Ogboru
{"title":"Recognising the rights of nature: How have the courts fared?","authors":"Tolulope N. Ogboru","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Rights of Nature (RoN) concept is an evolving theory in environmental law. It advocates that natural objects be respected and allowed to exist, thrive and flourish for themselves and not for utilitarian purposes. However, attempts to apply the rights often result in litigation. The outcomes of these cases have grave implications for the impact of the RoN concept on the development of jurisprudence and environmental protection, which will further determine its acceptance or rejection by the international community. An examination of some key cases reveals some positive developments that can enhance the implementation of the concept, but it also demonstrates that there are some challenges in the approach adopted by the courts. The article concludes that the RoN can be a jurisprudential tool to enhance environmental protection only where, in addition to well-written constitutional and legislative provisions, court decisions in these cases are of practical consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":47166,"journal":{"name":"European Law Journal","volume":"29 3-6","pages":"445-458"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eulj.12490","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Rights of Nature (RoN) concept is an evolving theory in environmental law. It advocates that natural objects be respected and allowed to exist, thrive and flourish for themselves and not for utilitarian purposes. However, attempts to apply the rights often result in litigation. The outcomes of these cases have grave implications for the impact of the RoN concept on the development of jurisprudence and environmental protection, which will further determine its acceptance or rejection by the international community. An examination of some key cases reveals some positive developments that can enhance the implementation of the concept, but it also demonstrates that there are some challenges in the approach adopted by the courts. The article concludes that the RoN can be a jurisprudential tool to enhance environmental protection only where, in addition to well-written constitutional and legislative provisions, court decisions in these cases are of practical consequences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
承认自然的权利:法院的表现如何?
自然权利(RoN)概念是环境法中一个不断发展的理论。它主张尊重自然物,允许自然物为自身而非功利目的而存在、繁荣和发展。然而,试图应用这些权利往往会导致诉讼。这些案件的结果严重影响了 RoN 概念对法学发展和环境保护的影响,这将进一步决定国际社会是接受还是拒绝这一概念。对一些关键案例的研究揭示了一些积极的发展,这些发展可以加强这一概念的实施,但同时也表明法院采用的方法存在一些挑战。文章的结论是,《罗马规约》只有在以下情况下才能成为加强环境保护的法学工具:除了宪法和法律规定的完善外,法院在这些案件中的判决也具有实际影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
21.10%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The European Law Journal represents an authoritative new approach to the study of European Law, developed specifically to express and develop the study and understanding of European law in its social, cultural, political and economic context. It has a highly reputed board of editors. The journal fills a major gap in the current literature on all issues of European law, and is essential reading for anyone studying or practising EU law and its diverse impact on the environment, national legal systems, local government, economic organizations, and European citizens. As well as focusing on the European Union, the journal also examines the national legal systems of countries in Western, Central and Eastern Europe and relations between Europe and other parts of the world, particularly the United States, Japan, China, India, Mercosur and developing countries. The journal is published in English but is dedicated to publishing native language articles and has a dedicated translation fund available for this purpose. It is a refereed journal.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Hungary's attacks on human dignity: Article 2 TEU and the foundations of democracy in the European Union The politics of integration in retrospect and the supranational mega-politics of governance and design in prospect: A roadmap Strategic foresight as a beacon for the new EU industrial policy Dare scholars look to the future? Academia and strategic foresight for the European Union's foreign policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1