Learning to govern: A typology of ministerial learning styles

IF 4.3 2区 管理学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Public Administration Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI:10.1111/padm.12994
John Boswell, Jessica C. Smith, Daniel Devine, Jack Corbett
{"title":"Learning to govern: A typology of ministerial learning styles","authors":"John Boswell, Jessica C. Smith, Daniel Devine, Jack Corbett","doi":"10.1111/padm.12994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A quirk of the Westminster system is that Ministers invariably have to “learn on the job”. Yet “learning” has been surprisingly understudied in work on executive government in Britain especially. In this paper, we offer a systematic account of Ministerial learning based on a comprehensive analysis of the Ministers Reflect archive—the largest dataset of research interviews with former Westminster ministers ever assembled. We identify six distinct learning styles—incremental, risk‐averse, managerial, creative, instrumental and instinctive—and assess the implications for how Ministers adjust to the challenges of high political office. We conclude by showing what an appreciation for this variety of Ministerial learning styles can offer the study and practice of executive government in Britain and beyond.","PeriodicalId":48284,"journal":{"name":"Public Administration","volume":"155 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12994","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A quirk of the Westminster system is that Ministers invariably have to “learn on the job”. Yet “learning” has been surprisingly understudied in work on executive government in Britain especially. In this paper, we offer a systematic account of Ministerial learning based on a comprehensive analysis of the Ministers Reflect archive—the largest dataset of research interviews with former Westminster ministers ever assembled. We identify six distinct learning styles—incremental, risk‐averse, managerial, creative, instrumental and instinctive—and assess the implications for how Ministers adjust to the challenges of high political office. We conclude by showing what an appreciation for this variety of Ministerial learning styles can offer the study and practice of executive government in Britain and beyond.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学会治理:部长学习风格类型
威斯敏斯特制度的一个怪癖是,大臣们总是必须 "在工作中学习"。然而,在有关英国行政政府的研究中,对 "学习 "的研究却少得令人吃惊。在本文中,我们基于对 "部长反思 "档案的全面分析,对部长的学习进行了系统阐述。"部长反思 "档案是迄今为止对威斯敏斯特前部长进行研究访谈的最大数据集。我们确定了六种不同的学习风格--进取型、风险规避型、管理型、创造型、工具型和本能型,并评估了这些风格对大臣们如何适应高级政治职位挑战的影响。最后,我们展示了对部长学习风格多样性的认识对英国及其他国家行政政府的研究和实践有何帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
17.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Public Administration is a major refereed journal with global circulation and global coverage. The journal publishes articles on public administration, public policy and public management. The journal"s reach is both inclusive and international and much of the work published is comparative in nature. A high percentage of articles are sourced from the enlarging Europe and cover all aspects of West and East European public administration.
期刊最新文献
Algorithmic formalization: Impacts on administrative processes Making nonpunitive accountability matter: Exploring behavioral effects of nonpunitive accountability in a conjoint experiment Why do politicians perceive the same financial conditions differently? How to extend pilot innovation in public services: A case of children's social care innovation Street‐level bureaucrats' perceptions of “the job”: Deviation from professional particularities and micro creation of public value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1