Follow-up and histocompatibility observation of urethral reconstruction with different materials.

IF 1.5 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY American journal of clinical and experimental urology Pub Date : 2024-02-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Hongtian Sun, Haoxuan Yang, Mingxuan Yang, Qian Li, Wenyong Xue, Jinchun Qi
{"title":"Follow-up and histocompatibility observation of urethral reconstruction with different materials.","authors":"Hongtian Sun, Haoxuan Yang, Mingxuan Yang, Qian Li, Wenyong Xue, Jinchun Qi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective is to observe the long-term surgical results of urethral reconstruction using either pedicled penile flaps or lingual mucosa grafts. We also assess the histocompatibility of the reconstructed urethra.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Clinical data of patients with anterior urethral stenosis undergoing urethra reconstruction by applying different materials were collected from 2014 to 2022 in the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University. We assessed their efficacy and the occurrence of complications. Patients who required reoperation due to complications were selected. Sections of the reconstructed urethra created with various materials were excised during repair procedures. The excised tissues underwent hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunohistochemistry. Comparison with the original histological morphology was conducted to evaluate histocompatibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>42 of the 55 patients were cured which showed a surgical success rate of 76.36%. The success rate of urethra reconstruction surgery utilizing lingual mucosa is 71.43% and that of surgeries using pedicled penis flaps is 79.41%. The long-term prognosis of the two groups is similar (P > 0.05). Observations show that the histological morphology of the original epithelium gradually disappeared, leading to adaptive changes to the urinary environment with favorable histocompatibility.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of lingual mucosal and pedicled penis flaps for urethral reconstruction both have a high surgical success rate. The long-term follow-up results are positive. Both methods are viable for urethral reconstruction and exhibit favorable histocompatibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":7438,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","volume":"12 1","pages":"36-45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10944369/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Our objective is to observe the long-term surgical results of urethral reconstruction using either pedicled penile flaps or lingual mucosa grafts. We also assess the histocompatibility of the reconstructed urethra.

Materials and methods: Clinical data of patients with anterior urethral stenosis undergoing urethra reconstruction by applying different materials were collected from 2014 to 2022 in the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University. We assessed their efficacy and the occurrence of complications. Patients who required reoperation due to complications were selected. Sections of the reconstructed urethra created with various materials were excised during repair procedures. The excised tissues underwent hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunohistochemistry. Comparison with the original histological morphology was conducted to evaluate histocompatibility.

Results: 42 of the 55 patients were cured which showed a surgical success rate of 76.36%. The success rate of urethra reconstruction surgery utilizing lingual mucosa is 71.43% and that of surgeries using pedicled penis flaps is 79.41%. The long-term prognosis of the two groups is similar (P > 0.05). Observations show that the histological morphology of the original epithelium gradually disappeared, leading to adaptive changes to the urinary environment with favorable histocompatibility.

Conclusion: The application of lingual mucosal and pedicled penis flaps for urethral reconstruction both have a high surgical success rate. The long-term follow-up results are positive. Both methods are viable for urethral reconstruction and exhibit favorable histocompatibility.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用不同材料进行尿道重建的随访和组织相容性观察。
目的:我们的目的是观察使用带蒂阴茎皮瓣或舌粘膜移植物进行尿道重建的长期手术效果。我们还评估了重建尿道的组织相容性:收集2014年至2022年河北医科大学第二医院采用不同材料重建尿道的前尿道狭窄患者的临床资料。我们对其疗效和并发症发生情况进行了评估。选择因并发症需要再次手术的患者。在修复过程中,我们切除了使用不同材料重建的尿道部分。切除的组织进行苏木精-伊红染色和免疫组化。与原始组织学形态进行比较,以评估组织相容性:55例患者中有42例治愈,手术成功率为76.36%。利用舌粘膜进行尿道重建手术的成功率为 71.43%,利用阴茎瓣进行手术的成功率为 79.41%。两组患者的长期预后相似(P>0.05)。观察结果显示,原上皮的组织学形态逐渐消失,导致对泌尿环境的适应性改变,组织相容性良好:结论:应用舌侧粘膜瓣和带蒂阴茎瓣重建尿道的手术成功率都很高。长期随访结果良好。这两种方法都可用于尿道重建,并表现出良好的组织相容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Mendelian randomisation approach to explore genetic factors associated with erectile dysfunction based on pooled genomic data. Administering antibiotic-loaded irrigation fluid as an alternative for prophylactic intravenous antibiotics in transurethral ureterolithotripsy (TUL): a randomized controlled trial. Decreased expression of LncRNA CRYM-AS1 promotes apoptosis through the Hippo-YAP1 signaling pathway leading to diabetic erectile dysfunction. Minimally invasive management of extraperitoneal bladder injury with extension to the trigone of the bladder with bilateral external ureteral catheterization: innovative approach instead of open surgical treatment. N4-acetyl-sulfamethoxazole stone in a patient on chronic trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole therapy: a case report and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1