Cytomegalovirus Treatment in Solid Organ Transplantation: An Update on Current Approaches.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1177/10600280241237534
Karen L Hardinger, Daniel C Brennan
{"title":"Cytomegalovirus Treatment in Solid Organ Transplantation: An Update on Current Approaches.","authors":"Karen L Hardinger, Daniel C Brennan","doi":"10.1177/10600280241237534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The article reviews the safety and efficacy of treatments for cytomegalovirus (CMV) in solid organ transplantation.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A literature review was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Clinicaltrials.gov from database inception through January 2024, using terms CMV, therapy, and solid organ transplantation.</p><p><strong>Study selection and data extraction: </strong>Clinical trials, meta-analyses, cohort studies, case reports, and guidelines were included. Letters to the editor, reviews, and commentaries were excluded.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>After abstract screening and full-text review of 728 citations for eligibility, 53 were included. Valganciclovir and intravenous ganciclovir are drugs of choice for CMV management and, until recently, the availability of alternative options has been restricted due to toxicity. For instance, foscarnet and cidofovir serve as second-line agents due to potential bone marrow and renal toxicity. In patients with refractory or resistant CMV, maribavir, a novel oral agent, has proven efficacy and a lower adverse effect profile. However, in refractory or resistant CMV, foscarnet and cidofovir are preferred in invasive disease (CMV gastritis, CMV retinitis, and CMV encephalitis), high viral loads, and inability to tolerate oral preparations.</p><p><strong>Relevance to patient care and clinical practice: </strong>Consensus guidelines have not been revised since approval of novel antivirals in solid organ transplantation. Valganciclovir and ganciclovir remain drugs of choice for initial CMV therapy. Foscarnet, cidofovir, and maribavir are treatments for refractory or resistant-CMV.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Selection of CMV antiviral treatment should be determined by patient-specific factors, including severity of illness, resistant or refractory disease, dose-limiting adverse effects, and the preferred route of administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280241237534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The article reviews the safety and efficacy of treatments for cytomegalovirus (CMV) in solid organ transplantation.

Data sources: A literature review was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Clinicaltrials.gov from database inception through January 2024, using terms CMV, therapy, and solid organ transplantation.

Study selection and data extraction: Clinical trials, meta-analyses, cohort studies, case reports, and guidelines were included. Letters to the editor, reviews, and commentaries were excluded.

Data synthesis: After abstract screening and full-text review of 728 citations for eligibility, 53 were included. Valganciclovir and intravenous ganciclovir are drugs of choice for CMV management and, until recently, the availability of alternative options has been restricted due to toxicity. For instance, foscarnet and cidofovir serve as second-line agents due to potential bone marrow and renal toxicity. In patients with refractory or resistant CMV, maribavir, a novel oral agent, has proven efficacy and a lower adverse effect profile. However, in refractory or resistant CMV, foscarnet and cidofovir are preferred in invasive disease (CMV gastritis, CMV retinitis, and CMV encephalitis), high viral loads, and inability to tolerate oral preparations.

Relevance to patient care and clinical practice: Consensus guidelines have not been revised since approval of novel antivirals in solid organ transplantation. Valganciclovir and ganciclovir remain drugs of choice for initial CMV therapy. Foscarnet, cidofovir, and maribavir are treatments for refractory or resistant-CMV.

Conclusions: Selection of CMV antiviral treatment should be determined by patient-specific factors, including severity of illness, resistant or refractory disease, dose-limiting adverse effects, and the preferred route of administration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实体器官移植中的巨细胞病毒治疗:当前方法的最新进展。
目的:本文回顾了实体器官移植中巨细胞病毒(CMV)治疗的安全性和有效性:文章回顾了实体器官移植中巨细胞病毒(CMV)治疗的安全性和有效性:在PubMed、MEDLINE和Clinicaltrials.gov数据库中使用CMV、治疗和实体器官移植等术语进行了文献综述:纳入临床试验、荟萃分析、队列研究、病例报告和指南。数据综合:经过摘要筛选和全文审阅,728 篇引文符合条件,其中 53 篇被纳入。缬更昔洛韦和静脉注射更昔洛韦是治疗 CMV 的首选药物,直到最近,由于毒性问题,替代药物的可用性一直受到限制。例如,由于存在潜在的骨髓和肾毒性,福斯卡韦(foscarnet)和西多福韦(cidofovir)可作为二线药物。对于难治性或耐药性 CMV 患者,新型口服药物 maribavir 的疗效已得到证实,且不良反应较低。然而,对于难治性或耐药的 CMV 患者,如果患有侵袭性疾病(CMV 胃炎、CMV 视网膜炎和 CMV 脑炎)、病毒载量高且无法耐受口服制剂,则首选福沙耐特和西多福韦:与患者护理和临床实践的相关性:自新型抗病毒药物获准用于实体器官移植以来,共识指南尚未进行修订。缬更昔洛韦和更昔洛韦仍然是CMV初始治疗的首选药物。Foscarnet、cidofovir和maribavir是治疗难治或耐药CMV的药物:结论:CMV 抗病毒治疗的选择应取决于患者的具体因素,包括病情严重程度、耐药或难治性疾病、剂量限制性不良反应以及首选给药途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1