Oral Rinses: Some Kill and Some Cripple Candida albicans.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medical Principles and Practice Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1159/000538368
Homa Darmani, Dua'a Riyad Husain Al-Saleh
{"title":"Oral Rinses: Some Kill and Some Cripple Candida albicans.","authors":"Homa Darmani, Dua'a Riyad Husain Al-Saleh","doi":"10.1159/000538368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Oral healthcare professionals play a crucial role in guiding patients toward evidence-based choices among the many available oral rinses. In this study, we explored how specific oral rinse formulations affect the viability and modulate critical virulence traits of the opportunistic fungal pathogen Candida albicans.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We assessed the effects of these oral rinses on the production of germ tube, production of phospholipase and hemolysin, as well as biofilm formation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that oral rinses containing cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) and chlorhexidine (CHX) showed the greatest fungicidal activity with the lowest MFCs (0.38% and 0.78%, respectively). Oral rinses based on zinc chloride and sodium fluoride with Miswak bark extract (MIS) or essential oils (EO) had much lower fungicidal activity (8-16 times lower) compared to CHX and CPC. However, they had a significantly greater impact on the virulence traits of C. albicans. They reduced germ tube production by 86% - 89% (versus 42% for CHX and 29% for CPC), completely inhibited phospholipase and hemolysin production, and together with the CPC-based oral rinse, exerted the greatest reductions in biofilm formation across all tested concentrations. This was in contrast to both the controls and CHX, which had a minimal effect on biofilm formation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By inhibiting the virulence factors the oral rinse can have a crippling effect on C. albicans, weakening this opportunistic pathogen and hindering its potential to cause infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":18455,"journal":{"name":"Medical Principles and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11324223/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Principles and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538368","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Oral healthcare professionals play a crucial role in guiding patients toward evidence-based choices among the many available oral rinses. In this study, we explored how specific oral rinse formulations affect the viability and modulate critical virulence traits of the opportunistic fungal pathogen Candida albicans.

Materials and methods: We assessed the effects of these oral rinses on the production of germ tube, production of phospholipase and hemolysin, as well as biofilm formation.

Results: We found that oral rinses containing cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) and chlorhexidine (CHX) showed the greatest fungicidal activity with the lowest MFCs (0.38% and 0.78%, respectively). Oral rinses based on zinc chloride and sodium fluoride with Miswak bark extract (MIS) or essential oils (EO) had much lower fungicidal activity (8-16 times lower) compared to CHX and CPC. However, they had a significantly greater impact on the virulence traits of C. albicans. They reduced germ tube production by 86% - 89% (versus 42% for CHX and 29% for CPC), completely inhibited phospholipase and hemolysin production, and together with the CPC-based oral rinse, exerted the greatest reductions in biofilm formation across all tested concentrations. This was in contrast to both the controls and CHX, which had a minimal effect on biofilm formation.

Conclusion: By inhibiting the virulence factors the oral rinse can have a crippling effect on C. albicans, weakening this opportunistic pathogen and hindering its potential to cause infection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口腔漱口水:有的能杀死白色念珠菌,有的则会使其丧失活力。
目的:口腔保健专业人员在指导患者从众多口腔漱口水中做出循证选择方面发挥着至关重要的作用。在这项研究中,我们探讨了特定口腔漱口水配方如何影响机会性真菌病原体白色念珠菌的活力并调节其关键毒力特征:我们评估了这些口腔漱口水对芽管的产生、磷脂酶和溶血素的产生以及生物膜形成的影响:结果:我们发现,含有氯化十六烷基吡啶(CPC)和洗必泰(CHX)的口腔漱口水具有最强的杀菌活性和最低的 MFCs(分别为 0.38% 和 0.78%)。与 CHX 和 CPC 相比,以氯化锌和氟化钠为基础并添加了密斯瓦克树皮提取物(MIS)或精油(EO)的口腔漱口水的杀菌活性要低得多(低 8-16 倍)。不过,它们对白僵菌毒力特征的影响要大得多。它们减少了 86% - 89% 的芽管生成(而 CHX 和 CPC 分别为 42% 和 29%),完全抑制了磷脂酶和溶血素的生成,并且与基于 CPC 的口腔冲洗剂一起,在所有测试浓度中对生物膜的形成产生了最大的抑制作用。这与对照组和 CHX 形成生物膜的影响极小形成鲜明对比:结论:通过抑制致病因子,口腔冲洗剂可对白僵菌产生抑制作用,从而削弱这种机会性病原体的能力,阻碍其引发感染的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Principles and Practice
Medical Principles and Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Medical Principles and Practice'', as the journal of the Health Sciences Centre, Kuwait University, aims to be a publication of international repute that will be a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the health sciences.
期刊最新文献
Surveillance of QTc-Interval Prolonging Medications Upon Admission Throughout Hospitalization in a Tertiary Care Geriatric Ward. Exploring Trends and Challenges in Global Health Dental Education: Scoping Review. Histamine Promotes Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Formation and Renders Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms More Resistant to Gentamicin and Azithromycin. Vitamin D supplementation mediates a shift towards anti-inflammatory cytokine response in Multiple Sclerosis. Evaluation of the Relationship between CD44 Expression and Gleason Grade Among Prostate Adenocarcinoma and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: a cross-section study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1