{"title":"[The p-value of the test is not a 'mathematical index', it is simply a relative frequency].","authors":"C Carazo-Díaz, L Prieto-Valiente","doi":"10.33588/rn.7807.2023164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Leading scientific journals in fields such as medicine, biology and sociology repeatedly publish articles and editorials claiming that a large percentage of doctors do not understand the basics of statistical analysis, which increases the risk of errors in interpreting data, makes them more vulnerable to misinformation and reduces the effectiveness of research. This problem extends throughout their careers and is largely due to the poor training they receive in statistics - a problem that is common in developed countries. As stated by H. Halle and S. Krauss, '90% of German university lecturers who regularly use the p-value in tests do not understand what that value actually measures'. It is important to note that the basic reasoning of statistical analysis is similar to what we do in our daily lives and that understanding the basic concepts of statistical analysis does not require any knowledge of mathematics. Contrary to what many researchers believe, the p-value of the test is not a 'mathematical index' that allows us to clearly conclude whether, for example, a drug is more effective than a placebo. The p-value of the test is simply a percentage.</p>","PeriodicalId":21281,"journal":{"name":"Revista de neurologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11407455/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.7807.2023164","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Leading scientific journals in fields such as medicine, biology and sociology repeatedly publish articles and editorials claiming that a large percentage of doctors do not understand the basics of statistical analysis, which increases the risk of errors in interpreting data, makes them more vulnerable to misinformation and reduces the effectiveness of research. This problem extends throughout their careers and is largely due to the poor training they receive in statistics - a problem that is common in developed countries. As stated by H. Halle and S. Krauss, '90% of German university lecturers who regularly use the p-value in tests do not understand what that value actually measures'. It is important to note that the basic reasoning of statistical analysis is similar to what we do in our daily lives and that understanding the basic concepts of statistical analysis does not require any knowledge of mathematics. Contrary to what many researchers believe, the p-value of the test is not a 'mathematical index' that allows us to clearly conclude whether, for example, a drug is more effective than a placebo. The p-value of the test is simply a percentage.
医学、生物学和社会学等领域的主要科学杂志一再发表文章和社论,声称很大比例的医生不了解统计分析的基本知识,这增加了他们在解释数据时出错的风险,使他们更容易受到错误信息的影响,并降低了研究的有效性。这个问题贯穿于医生的整个职业生涯,主要原因是他们接受的统计培训不足--这个问题在发达国家很普遍。正如 H. Halle 和 S. Krauss 所说,"90% 的德国大学讲师在测试中经常使用 p 值,但他们并不了解该值的实际衡量标准"。值得注意的是,统计分析的基本推理与我们的日常生活相似,理解统计分析的基本概念并不需要任何数学知识。与许多研究人员所认为的相反,检验的 p 值并不是一个 "数学指标",不能让我们清楚地得出结论,例如某种药物是否比安慰剂更有效。检验的 p 值只是一个百分比。