What really matters for returning to work after breast cancer? A 6-month exploratory study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Women & Health Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1080/03630242.2024.2324312
Elena Fiabane, Paola Dordoni, Cecilia Perrone, Antonio Bernardo, Fabio Corsi, Paola Gabanelli
{"title":"What really matters for returning to work after breast cancer? A 6-month exploratory study.","authors":"Elena Fiabane, Paola Dordoni, Cecilia Perrone, Antonio Bernardo, Fabio Corsi, Paola Gabanelli","doi":"10.1080/03630242.2024.2324312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Return to work (RTW) after breast cancer (BC) may significantly impact on women recovery and quality of life. Literature hightlighed several factors associated to RTW after BC but there is still some concern about prognostic factors influencing work resumption after BC treatments. The present study aims to explore which baseline factors are associated with RTW at 6-month after BC surgery. The participants in this 6-month prospective study were 149 patients who underwent breast cancer-related surgery and accessed an Oncology Clinic for cancer therapy from March 2017 to December 2019 in Northern Italy. Participants filled in a battery of questionnaires at baseline, and they were asked whether they had returned to work at 6-month follow-up. Psychological measurements included job stress (Job Content Questionnaire), work engagement (Utrecht Work Engagement Scale), quality of life (World Health Organization Quality of Life- BREF), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), resilience (Connor - Davidson Resilience Scale - 10 item) and personal expectations about RTW (ad-hoc single item). Moreover, sociodemographic, clinical, and work-related data were collected. Independent t-test and Chi-square test were used for comparisons among variables; logistic regression model was used to explore predictors of RTW. A total of 73.9 percent returned to work at6-month after surgery. In the multivariate model, chemiotherapy (B = -1.428; SE = 0.520) and baseline women's expectations about their RTW (B = -0.340; DS = 0.156) were significant predictors of RTW. These results suggest that careful individual clinical and psychological screening of risk factors at baseline can prevent from occupational disability and long sickness absence.</p>","PeriodicalId":23972,"journal":{"name":"Women & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2024.2324312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Return to work (RTW) after breast cancer (BC) may significantly impact on women recovery and quality of life. Literature hightlighed several factors associated to RTW after BC but there is still some concern about prognostic factors influencing work resumption after BC treatments. The present study aims to explore which baseline factors are associated with RTW at 6-month after BC surgery. The participants in this 6-month prospective study were 149 patients who underwent breast cancer-related surgery and accessed an Oncology Clinic for cancer therapy from March 2017 to December 2019 in Northern Italy. Participants filled in a battery of questionnaires at baseline, and they were asked whether they had returned to work at 6-month follow-up. Psychological measurements included job stress (Job Content Questionnaire), work engagement (Utrecht Work Engagement Scale), quality of life (World Health Organization Quality of Life- BREF), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), resilience (Connor - Davidson Resilience Scale - 10 item) and personal expectations about RTW (ad-hoc single item). Moreover, sociodemographic, clinical, and work-related data were collected. Independent t-test and Chi-square test were used for comparisons among variables; logistic regression model was used to explore predictors of RTW. A total of 73.9 percent returned to work at6-month after surgery. In the multivariate model, chemiotherapy (B = -1.428; SE = 0.520) and baseline women's expectations about their RTW (B = -0.340; DS = 0.156) were significant predictors of RTW. These results suggest that careful individual clinical and psychological screening of risk factors at baseline can prevent from occupational disability and long sickness absence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺癌术后重返工作岗位的真正关键是什么?为期 6 个月的探索性研究
乳腺癌(BC)术后重返工作岗位(RTW)可能会对妇女的康复和生活质量产生重大影响。文献强调了与乳腺癌术后复工相关的几个因素,但对于影响乳腺癌术后复工的预后因素仍有一些担忧。本研究旨在探讨哪些基线因素与 BC 术后 6 个月的复工相关。这项为期6个月的前瞻性研究的参与者是2017年3月至2019年12月期间在意大利北部接受乳腺癌相关手术并前往肿瘤诊所接受癌症治疗的149名患者。参与者在基线时填写了一系列问卷,并在6个月的随访中被问及是否已重返工作岗位。心理测量包括工作压力(工作内容问卷)、工作参与度(乌得勒支工作参与度量表)、生活质量(世界卫生组织生活质量--BREF)、焦虑和抑郁(医院焦虑和抑郁量表)、复原力(康纳-戴维森复原力量表--10项)和个人对复工的期望(临时单项)。此外,还收集了社会人口学、临床和工作相关数据。变量间的比较采用独立 t 检验和卡方检验;预测复工的因素采用逻辑回归模型。共有73.9%的患者在术后6个月重返工作岗位。在多变量模型中,化疗(B = -1.428; SE = 0.520)和基线妇女对其复工的期望(B = -0.340; DS = 0.156)是复工的重要预测因素。这些结果表明,在基线阶段对风险因素进行仔细的个人临床和心理筛查可以避免职业残疾和长期病假。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Women & Health
Women & Health Multiple-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Women & Health publishes original papers and critical reviews containing highly useful information for researchers, policy planners, and all providers of health care for women. These papers cover findings from studies concerning health and illness and physical and psychological well-being of women, as well as the environmental, lifestyle and sociocultural factors that are associated with health and disease, which have implications for prevention, early detection and treatment, limitation of disability and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of arterial stiffness index predictors in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. Pregnant women's depression and posttraumatic stress levels after the large-scale Turkey earthquakes: a cross-sectional study. Healthcare provider's perspective on the implementation & adoption of digitalized antenatal care services in Bangladesh. Gender roles as predictive factors on labor pain: a cross-sectional study. Mental health in mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1