Accelerated IVIM-corrected DTI in acute hamstring injury: towards a clinically feasible acquisition time.

IF 3.7 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Radiology Experimental Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1186/s41747-024-00437-1
Susanne S Rauh, Jozef J M Suskens, Jithsa R Monte, Frank Smithuis, Oliver J Gurney-Champion, Johannes L Tol, Mario Maas, Aart J Nederveen, Gustav J Strijkers, Melissa T Hooijmans
{"title":"Accelerated IVIM-corrected DTI in acute hamstring injury: towards a clinically feasible acquisition time.","authors":"Susanne S Rauh, Jozef J M Suskens, Jithsa R Monte, Frank Smithuis, Oliver J Gurney-Champion, Johannes L Tol, Mario Maas, Aart J Nederveen, Gustav J Strijkers, Melissa T Hooijmans","doi":"10.1186/s41747-024-00437-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-corrected diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) potentially enhances return-to-play (RTP) prediction after hamstring injuries. However, the long scan times hamper clinical implementation. We assessed accelerated IVIM-corrected DTI approaches in acute hamstring injuries and explore the sensitivity of the perfusion fraction (f) to acute muscle damage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Athletes with acute hamstring injury received DTI scans of both thighs < 7 days after injury and at RTP. For a subset, DTI scans were repeated with multiband (MB) acceleration. Data from standard and MB-accelerated scans were fitted with standard and accelerated IVIM-corrected DTI approach using high b-values only. Segmentations of the injury and contralateral healthy muscles were contoured. The fitting methods as well as the standard and MB-accelerated scan were compared using linear regression analysis. For sensitivity to injury, Δ(injured minus healthy) DTI parameters between the methods and the differences between injured and healthy muscles were compared (Wilcoxon signed-rank test).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline dataset consisted of 109 athletes (16 with MB acceleration); 64 of them received an RTP scan (8 with MB acceleration). Linear regression of the standard and high-b DTI fitting showed excellent agreement. With both fitting methods, standard and MB-accelerated scans were comparable. Δ(injured minus healthy) was similar between standard and accelerated methods. For all methods, all IVIM-DTI parameters except f were significantly different between injured and healthy muscles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High-b DTI fitting with MB acceleration reduced the scan time from 11:08 to 3:40 min:s while maintaining sensitivity to hamstring injuries; f was not different between healthy and injured muscles.</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong>The accelerated IVIM-corrected DTI protocol, using fewer b-values and MB acceleration, reduced the scan time to under 4 min without affecting the sensitivity of the quantitative outcome parameters to hamstring injuries. This allows for routine clinical monitoring of hamstring injuries, which could directly benefit injury treatment and monitoring.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>• Combining high-b DTI-fitting and multiband-acceleration dramatically reduced by two thirds the scan time. • The accelerated IVIM-corrected DTI approaches maintained the sensitivity to hamstring injuries. • The IVIM-derived perfusion fraction was not sensitive to hamstring injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":36926,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology Experimental","volume":"8 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10948680/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00437-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-corrected diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) potentially enhances return-to-play (RTP) prediction after hamstring injuries. However, the long scan times hamper clinical implementation. We assessed accelerated IVIM-corrected DTI approaches in acute hamstring injuries and explore the sensitivity of the perfusion fraction (f) to acute muscle damage.

Methods: Athletes with acute hamstring injury received DTI scans of both thighs < 7 days after injury and at RTP. For a subset, DTI scans were repeated with multiband (MB) acceleration. Data from standard and MB-accelerated scans were fitted with standard and accelerated IVIM-corrected DTI approach using high b-values only. Segmentations of the injury and contralateral healthy muscles were contoured. The fitting methods as well as the standard and MB-accelerated scan were compared using linear regression analysis. For sensitivity to injury, Δ(injured minus healthy) DTI parameters between the methods and the differences between injured and healthy muscles were compared (Wilcoxon signed-rank test).

Results: The baseline dataset consisted of 109 athletes (16 with MB acceleration); 64 of them received an RTP scan (8 with MB acceleration). Linear regression of the standard and high-b DTI fitting showed excellent agreement. With both fitting methods, standard and MB-accelerated scans were comparable. Δ(injured minus healthy) was similar between standard and accelerated methods. For all methods, all IVIM-DTI parameters except f were significantly different between injured and healthy muscles.

Conclusions: High-b DTI fitting with MB acceleration reduced the scan time from 11:08 to 3:40 min:s while maintaining sensitivity to hamstring injuries; f was not different between healthy and injured muscles.

Relevance statement: The accelerated IVIM-corrected DTI protocol, using fewer b-values and MB acceleration, reduced the scan time to under 4 min without affecting the sensitivity of the quantitative outcome parameters to hamstring injuries. This allows for routine clinical monitoring of hamstring injuries, which could directly benefit injury treatment and monitoring.

Key points: • Combining high-b DTI-fitting and multiband-acceleration dramatically reduced by two thirds the scan time. • The accelerated IVIM-corrected DTI approaches maintained the sensitivity to hamstring injuries. • The IVIM-derived perfusion fraction was not sensitive to hamstring injuries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性腿筋损伤的加速 IVIM 校正 DTI:实现临床可行的采集时间。
背景:经体细胞内不连贯运动(IVIM)校正的弥散张量成像(DTI)可提高腿筋损伤后重返赛场(RTP)的预测能力。然而,漫长的扫描时间阻碍了临床应用。我们评估了急性腿筋损伤的加速 IVIM 校正 DTI 方法,并探讨了灌注分数(f)对急性肌肉损伤的敏感性:方法:急性腘绳肌损伤的运动员接受双大腿的 DTI 扫描:基线数据集包括 109 名运动员(16 名采用 MB 加速);其中 64 名接受了 RTP 扫描(8 名采用 MB 加速)。标准 DTI 拟合与高 B DTI 拟合的线性回归显示出极好的一致性。使用这两种拟合方法,标准扫描和 MB 加速扫描结果相当。标准方法和加速方法的Δ(受伤减健康)相似。在所有方法中,除f外,所有IVIM-DTI参数在受伤肌肉和健康肌肉之间都有显著差异:结论:采用 MB 加速法进行高频 DTI 拟合可将扫描时间从 11:08 分钟缩短到 3:40 分钟,同时保持了对腿筋损伤的敏感性;健康肌肉和损伤肌肉之间的 f 没有差异:加速的 IVIM 校正 DTI 方案使用较少的 b 值和 MB 加速,将扫描时间缩短至 4 分钟以下,同时不影响定量结果参数对腘绳肌损伤的敏感性。这样就能对腘绳肌损伤进行常规临床监测,直接有利于损伤治疗和监测:- 要点:结合高频 DTI 拟合和多频带加速,扫描时间大幅缩短了三分之二。- 加速的 IVIM 校正 DTI 方法保持了对腘绳肌损伤的敏感性。- IVIM 衍生的灌注分数对腿筋损伤不敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology Experimental
European Radiology Experimental Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
An AI deep learning algorithm for detecting pulmonary nodules on ultra-low-dose CT in an emergency setting: a reader study. Evaluation of pulmonary artery pressure, blood indices, and myocardial microcirculation in rats returning from high altitude to moderate altitude. Image biomarkers and explainable AI: handcrafted features versus deep learned features. Technical feasibility of automated blur detection in digital mammography using convolutional neural network. Quantification of breast biopsy clip marker artifact on routine breast MRI sequences: a phantom study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1