Pairwise fitting of piecewise mixed models for the joint modeling of multivariate longitudinal outcomes, in a randomized crossover trial

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1002/bimj.202200333
Moses Mwangi, Geert Molenberghs, Edmund Njeru Njagi, Samuel Mwalili, Roel Braekers, Alvaro Jose Florez, Susan Gachau, Zipporah N. Bukania, Geert Verbeke
{"title":"Pairwise fitting of piecewise mixed models for the joint modeling of multivariate longitudinal outcomes, in a randomized crossover trial","authors":"Moses Mwangi,&nbsp;Geert Molenberghs,&nbsp;Edmund Njeru Njagi,&nbsp;Samuel Mwalili,&nbsp;Roel Braekers,&nbsp;Alvaro Jose Florez,&nbsp;Susan Gachau,&nbsp;Zipporah N. Bukania,&nbsp;Geert Verbeke","doi":"10.1002/bimj.202200333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many statistical models have been proposed in the literature for the analysis of longitudinal data. One may propose to model two or more correlated longitudinal processes simultaneously, with a goal of understanding their association over time. Joint modeling is then required to carefully study the association structure among the outcomes as well as drawing joint inferences about the different outcomes. In this study, we sought to model the associations among six nutrition outcomes while circumventing the computational challenge posed by their clustered and high-dimensional nature. We analyzed data from a 2 <math>\n <semantics>\n <mo>×</mo>\n <annotation>$\\times$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> 2 randomized crossover trial conducted in Kenya, to compare the effect of high-dose and low-dose iodine in household salt on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in women of reproductive age and their household matching pair of school-aged children. Two additional outcomes, namely, urinary iodine concentration (UIC) in women and children were measured repeatedly to monitor the amount of iodine excreted through urine. We extended the model proposed by Mwangi et al. (2021, <i>Communications in Statistics: Case Studies, Data Analysis and Applications</i>, <i>7</i>(3), 413–431) allowing flexible piecewise joint models for six outcomes to depend on separate random effects, which are themselves correlated. This entailed fitting 15 bivariate general linear mixed models and deriving inference for the joint model using pseudo-likelihood theory. We analyzed the outcomes separately and jointly using piecewise linear mixed-effects (PLME) model and further validated the results using current state-of-the-art Jones and Kenward methodology (JKME model) used for analyzing randomized crossover trials. The results indicate that high-dose iodine in salt significantly reduced blood pressure (BP) compared to low-dose iodine in salt. Estimates for the random effects and residual error components showed that SBP and DBP had strong positive correlation, with effect of the random slope indicating that significantly related outcomes are strongly associated in their evolution. There was a moderately strong inverse relationship between evolutions of UIC and BP both in women and children. These findings confirmed the original hypothesis that high-dose iodine salt has significant lowering effect on BP. We further sought to evaluate the performance of our proposed PLME model against the widely used JKME model, within the multivariate joint modeling framework through a simulation study mimicking a <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n <mo>×</mo>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$2\\times 2$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> crossover design. From our findings, the multivariate joint PLME model performed exceptionally well both in estimation of random-effects matrix (G) and Hessian matrix (H), allowing satisfactory model convergence during estimation. It allowed a more complex fit to the data with both random intercepts and slopes effects compared to the multivariate joint JKME model that allowed for random intercepts only. When a hierarchical viewpoint is adopted, in the sense that outcomes are specified conditionally upon random effects, the variance–covariance matrix of the random effects must be positive definite. In some cases, additional random effects could explain much variability in the data, thus improving precision in estimation of the estimands (effect size) parameters. The key highlight in this evaluation shows that multivariate joint JKME model is a powerful tool especially while fitting mixed models with random intercepts only, in crossover design settings. Addition of random slopes may lead to model complexities in most cases, resulting in unsatisfactory model convergence during estimation. To circumvent convergence pitfalls, extention of JKME model to PLME model allows a more flexible fit to the data (generated from crossover design settings), especially in the multivariate joint modeling framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bimj.202200333","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many statistical models have been proposed in the literature for the analysis of longitudinal data. One may propose to model two or more correlated longitudinal processes simultaneously, with a goal of understanding their association over time. Joint modeling is then required to carefully study the association structure among the outcomes as well as drawing joint inferences about the different outcomes. In this study, we sought to model the associations among six nutrition outcomes while circumventing the computational challenge posed by their clustered and high-dimensional nature. We analyzed data from a 2 × $\times$ 2 randomized crossover trial conducted in Kenya, to compare the effect of high-dose and low-dose iodine in household salt on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in women of reproductive age and their household matching pair of school-aged children. Two additional outcomes, namely, urinary iodine concentration (UIC) in women and children were measured repeatedly to monitor the amount of iodine excreted through urine. We extended the model proposed by Mwangi et al. (2021, Communications in Statistics: Case Studies, Data Analysis and Applications, 7(3), 413–431) allowing flexible piecewise joint models for six outcomes to depend on separate random effects, which are themselves correlated. This entailed fitting 15 bivariate general linear mixed models and deriving inference for the joint model using pseudo-likelihood theory. We analyzed the outcomes separately and jointly using piecewise linear mixed-effects (PLME) model and further validated the results using current state-of-the-art Jones and Kenward methodology (JKME model) used for analyzing randomized crossover trials. The results indicate that high-dose iodine in salt significantly reduced blood pressure (BP) compared to low-dose iodine in salt. Estimates for the random effects and residual error components showed that SBP and DBP had strong positive correlation, with effect of the random slope indicating that significantly related outcomes are strongly associated in their evolution. There was a moderately strong inverse relationship between evolutions of UIC and BP both in women and children. These findings confirmed the original hypothesis that high-dose iodine salt has significant lowering effect on BP. We further sought to evaluate the performance of our proposed PLME model against the widely used JKME model, within the multivariate joint modeling framework through a simulation study mimicking a 2 × 2 $2\times 2$ crossover design. From our findings, the multivariate joint PLME model performed exceptionally well both in estimation of random-effects matrix (G) and Hessian matrix (H), allowing satisfactory model convergence during estimation. It allowed a more complex fit to the data with both random intercepts and slopes effects compared to the multivariate joint JKME model that allowed for random intercepts only. When a hierarchical viewpoint is adopted, in the sense that outcomes are specified conditionally upon random effects, the variance–covariance matrix of the random effects must be positive definite. In some cases, additional random effects could explain much variability in the data, thus improving precision in estimation of the estimands (effect size) parameters. The key highlight in this evaluation shows that multivariate joint JKME model is a powerful tool especially while fitting mixed models with random intercepts only, in crossover design settings. Addition of random slopes may lead to model complexities in most cases, resulting in unsatisfactory model convergence during estimation. To circumvent convergence pitfalls, extention of JKME model to PLME model allows a more flexible fit to the data (generated from crossover design settings), especially in the multivariate joint modeling framework.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在随机交叉试验中,成对拟合用于多变量纵向结果联合建模的分片混合模型。
文献中提出了许多用于分析纵向数据的统计模型。有人可能会建议同时对两个或多个相关的纵向过程进行建模,目的是了解它们随着时间的推移而产生的关联。这就需要建立联合模型,以仔细研究结果之间的关联结构,并对不同结果进行联合推断。在本研究中,我们试图对六种营养结果之间的关联进行建模,同时规避它们的聚类和高维性质所带来的计算挑战。我们分析了在肯尼亚进行的一项 2 × $\times$ 2 随机交叉试验的数据,以比较家庭食盐中高剂量和低剂量碘对育龄妇女及其匹配的一对学龄儿童收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)的影响。此外,我们还反复测量了妇女和儿童的尿碘浓度(UIC),以监测通过尿液排出的碘量。我们扩展了 Mwangi 等人提出的模型(2021 年,《统计通讯》,案例研究、数据分析和应用,第 2 卷,第 3 期):案例研究、数据分析和应用》,7(3),413-431)提出的模型进行了扩展,使六个结果的灵活片断联合模型取决于单独的随机效应,而这些随机效应本身又是相关的。这需要拟合 15 个二元一般线性混合模型,并利用伪似然理论推导出联合模型。我们使用分片线性混合效应(PLME)模型对结果进行了单独和联合分析,并使用目前用于分析随机交叉试验的最先进的琼斯和肯沃德方法(JKME 模型)对结果进行了进一步验证。结果表明,与低剂量碘盐相比,高剂量碘盐能显著降低血压(BP)。随机效应和残差误差成分的估计结果显示,SBP 和 DBP 具有很强的正相关性,随机斜率效应表明,显著相关的结果在其演变过程中具有很强的相关性。在妇女和儿童中,UIC 和血压的演变之间存在中等程度的反向关系。这些发现证实了最初的假设,即高剂量碘盐具有明显降低血压的作用。在多变量联合建模框架下,我们通过模拟 2 × 2 2 次交叉设计的模拟研究,进一步评估了我们提出的 PLME 模型与广泛使用的 JKME 模型的性能。从我们的研究结果来看,多变量联合 PLME 模型在估计随机效应矩阵(G)和赫赛矩阵(H)方面都表现出色,在估计过程中模型收敛性令人满意。与只允许随机截距的多变量联合 JKME 模型相比,该模型能更复杂地拟合数据,同时具有随机截距和斜率效应。如果采用分层的观点,即结果是以随机效应为条件指定的,那么随机效应的方差-协方差矩阵必须是正定的。在某些情况下,额外的随机效应可以解释数据中的许多变异,从而提高估计值(效应大小)参数估计的精度。本次评估的主要亮点表明,多变量联合 JKME 模型是一种功能强大的工具,尤其是在交叉设计环境下,仅用随机截距拟合混合模型时。在大多数情况下,加入随机斜率可能会导致模型复杂化,从而导致估计过程中模型收敛性不理想。为了避免收敛性缺陷,将 JKME 模型扩展为 PLME 模型可以更灵活地拟合数据(由交叉设计设置生成),尤其是在多元联合建模框架中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1