Multiple dental implant failures: A retrospective analysis of implant retention time and risk factors.

Rebecca Rosen, Robert Haas, Werner Millesi, Georg Mailath-Pokorny, Sebastian Pohl, Veronika Pohl
{"title":"Multiple dental implant failures: A retrospective analysis of implant retention time and risk factors.","authors":"Rebecca Rosen, Robert Haas, Werner Millesi, Georg Mailath-Pokorny, Sebastian Pohl, Veronika Pohl","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The present retrospective study investigates implant retention time in patients who had experienced multiple implant failures and explores possible risk factors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients who underwent placement of at least two implants and experienced failure of two or more implants between 2004 and 2022 were included in the study population. Both patient- and implant-related risk factors, including age, sex, medical history, medication intake, smoking, alcohol consumption, implant properties and anatomical and surgical factors, were evaluated. Descriptive analysis and univariate and multivariate statistical analysis were performed to assess implant retention time and failure risk, with the level of statistical significance set at 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 371 patients (178 men and 193 women, median age 63 years) with 3,141 implants were included in the analysis (3.14% of all patients treated since 2004). Out of these implants, 1,090 failures were observed (59.01% of all failed implants at the Academy of Oral Implantology, Vienna, Austria), with a median retention time of 108.11 months. Patients who lost teeth due to periodontitis did not show a tendency towards early implant failure (P > 0.001). Nicotine consumption (P < 0.001), age < 50 years and > 70 years (P < 0.001), maxillary location (P = 0.05), transgingival healing (P < 0.001), no provisional restoration (P = 0.035) and short implant length (P < 0.001) were associated with statistically significantly shorter implant retention times.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with multiple implant failures displayed cluster behaviour and had a median implant retention time of 9 years. Smoking, short implant length, single-stage surgery and immediate loading were all associated with a higher risk of failure, whereas age between 50 and 70 years and tooth loss due to periodontitis were associated with a longer implant retention time.</p>","PeriodicalId":73463,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral implantology (Berlin, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The present retrospective study investigates implant retention time in patients who had experienced multiple implant failures and explores possible risk factors.

Materials and methods: Patients who underwent placement of at least two implants and experienced failure of two or more implants between 2004 and 2022 were included in the study population. Both patient- and implant-related risk factors, including age, sex, medical history, medication intake, smoking, alcohol consumption, implant properties and anatomical and surgical factors, were evaluated. Descriptive analysis and univariate and multivariate statistical analysis were performed to assess implant retention time and failure risk, with the level of statistical significance set at 0.05.

Results: A total of 371 patients (178 men and 193 women, median age 63 years) with 3,141 implants were included in the analysis (3.14% of all patients treated since 2004). Out of these implants, 1,090 failures were observed (59.01% of all failed implants at the Academy of Oral Implantology, Vienna, Austria), with a median retention time of 108.11 months. Patients who lost teeth due to periodontitis did not show a tendency towards early implant failure (P > 0.001). Nicotine consumption (P < 0.001), age < 50 years and > 70 years (P < 0.001), maxillary location (P = 0.05), transgingival healing (P < 0.001), no provisional restoration (P = 0.035) and short implant length (P < 0.001) were associated with statistically significantly shorter implant retention times.

Conclusions: Patients with multiple implant failures displayed cluster behaviour and had a median implant retention time of 9 years. Smoking, short implant length, single-stage surgery and immediate loading were all associated with a higher risk of failure, whereas age between 50 and 70 years and tooth loss due to periodontitis were associated with a longer implant retention time.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多次种植牙失败:对种植体保留时间和风险因素的回顾性分析。
背景:本回顾性研究调查了多次种植失败患者的种植体保留时间,并探讨了可能的风险因素:研究对象包括在 2004 年至 2022 年期间接受过至少两次种植手术并经历过两次或两次以上种植失败的患者。研究评估了患者和种植体相关的风险因素,包括年龄、性别、病史、药物摄入、吸烟、饮酒、种植体特性以及解剖和手术因素。对种植体保留时间和失败风险进行了描述性分析、单变量和多变量统计分析,统计显著性水平设定为0.05:共有 371 名患者(男性 178 人,女性 193 人,中位年龄 63 岁)的 3,141 个种植体被纳入分析范围(占 2004 年以来接受治疗的所有患者的 3.14%)。在这些种植体中,有 1090 个失败(占奥地利维也纳口腔种植学会所有失败种植体的 59.01%),中位保留时间为 108.11 个月。因牙周炎而失去牙齿的患者并不表现出种植体早期失败的趋势(P > 0.001)。尼古丁摄入量(P < 0.001)、年龄小于50岁和大于70岁(P < 0.001)、上颌位置(P = 0.05)、跨龈愈合(P < 0.001)、无临时修复(P = 0.035)和种植体长度短(P < 0.001)与种植体固位时间明显缩短有关:结论:多次种植失败的患者表现出集群行为,种植体保留时间的中位数为9年。吸烟、种植体长度较短、单阶段手术和即刻加载都与较高的失败风险有关,而年龄在50至70岁之间和牙周炎导致的牙齿缺失则与较长的种植体保留时间有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A 360-degree extraction socket classification for immediate dentoalveolar restoration. A randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of guided bone regeneration with polytetrafluoroethylene titanium-reinforced membranes, CAD/CAM semi-occlusive titanium meshes and CAD/CAM occlusive titanium foils in partially atrophic arches. Bone augmentation using titanium mesh: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical and histological efficacy of a new implant surface in achieving early and stable osseointegration: An in vivo study. Crown-to-implant ratio: A misnomer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1