Perioperative oxygenation—what's the stress?

Joseph Larvin , Mark Edwards , Daniel S. Martin , Martin Feelisch , Michael P.W. Grocott , Andrew F. Cumpstey
{"title":"Perioperative oxygenation—what's the stress?","authors":"Joseph Larvin ,&nbsp;Mark Edwards ,&nbsp;Daniel S. Martin ,&nbsp;Martin Feelisch ,&nbsp;Michael P.W. Grocott ,&nbsp;Andrew F. Cumpstey","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Oxygen is the most used drug in anaesthesia. Despite such widespread use, optimal perioperative oxygen administration remains highly controversial because of concerns about the competing harms of both hyperoxia and hypoxia.</p><p>Notwithstanding a Cochrane review concluding that routinely administering a fractional inspired oxygen concentration (FiO<sub>2</sub>) &gt;0.6 intraoperatively might increase postoperative morbidity and mortality, the World Health Organization (WHO) currently recommends all anaesthetised patients receive 0.8 FiO<sub>2</sub> during and immediately after surgery to reduce surgical site infections. Results from the largest trial available at the time of these two reviews (suggesting long-term survival may be worse with high FiO<sub>2</sub>, particularly in patients with malignant disease) were considered ‘biologically implausible’ by the WHO's Guideline Development Group. In addition, the integrity of some perioperative oxygen studies has been challenged. Resolving these controversies is of fundamental importance to all perioperative clinicians.</p><p>This narrative review is based on the inaugural <em>BJA</em> William Mapleson lecture delivered by the senior author (AC) at the 2023 annual meeting of the Royal College of Anaesthetists in Birmingham. We present the current evidence for perioperative oxygen administration and contrast this with how oxygen therapy is targeted in other specialties (e.g. intensive care medicine). We will explore whether anaesthetists follow the WHO recommendations and consider how oxygen administration affects the stress response to surgery. We reason that novel clinical trial designs in combination with targeted experimental medicine studies will be required to improve our understanding of how best to optimise individualised perioperative oxygenation—a cornerstone of anaesthesia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000212/pdfft?md5=e4c56e0ed1b7f3df5046ca39a5705c4a&pid=1-s2.0-S2772609624000212-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJA open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oxygen is the most used drug in anaesthesia. Despite such widespread use, optimal perioperative oxygen administration remains highly controversial because of concerns about the competing harms of both hyperoxia and hypoxia.

Notwithstanding a Cochrane review concluding that routinely administering a fractional inspired oxygen concentration (FiO2) >0.6 intraoperatively might increase postoperative morbidity and mortality, the World Health Organization (WHO) currently recommends all anaesthetised patients receive 0.8 FiO2 during and immediately after surgery to reduce surgical site infections. Results from the largest trial available at the time of these two reviews (suggesting long-term survival may be worse with high FiO2, particularly in patients with malignant disease) were considered ‘biologically implausible’ by the WHO's Guideline Development Group. In addition, the integrity of some perioperative oxygen studies has been challenged. Resolving these controversies is of fundamental importance to all perioperative clinicians.

This narrative review is based on the inaugural BJA William Mapleson lecture delivered by the senior author (AC) at the 2023 annual meeting of the Royal College of Anaesthetists in Birmingham. We present the current evidence for perioperative oxygen administration and contrast this with how oxygen therapy is targeted in other specialties (e.g. intensive care medicine). We will explore whether anaesthetists follow the WHO recommendations and consider how oxygen administration affects the stress response to surgery. We reason that novel clinical trial designs in combination with targeted experimental medicine studies will be required to improve our understanding of how best to optimise individualised perioperative oxygenation—a cornerstone of anaesthesia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围手术期氧合--压力有多大?
氧气是麻醉中使用最多的药物。尽管 Cochrane 综述得出结论认为术中常规给氧浓度为 0.6 可能会增加术后发病率和死亡率,但世界卫生组织(WHO)目前建议所有麻醉患者在术中和术后立即给氧浓度为 0.8,以减少手术部位感染。世卫组织的指南制定小组认为,在进行这两项审查时所获得的最大试验结果(表明高 FiO2 可能会降低长期存活率,尤其是恶性疾病患者的长期存活率)"在生物学上是不可信的"。此外,一些围手术期氧研究的完整性也受到了质疑。本综述基于资深作者(AC)在伯明翰举行的英国皇家麻醉师学院 2023 年年会上发表的首届 BJA William Mapleson 演讲。我们介绍了围术期给氧的现有证据,并将其与其他专科(如重症监护医学科)的氧疗目标进行了对比。我们将探讨麻醉师是否遵循世界卫生组织的建议,并考虑给氧对手术应激反应的影响。我们的理由是,需要新颖的临床试验设计与有针对性的实验医学研究相结合,以提高我们对如何最好地优化个性化围术期吸氧--麻醉的基石--的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJA open
BJA open Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
期刊最新文献
Cardiac coherence and medical hypnosis: a feasibility study of a new combined approach for managing preoperative anxiety in patients with breast or gynaecological cancer Perioperative considerations in the paediatric patient with congenital and acquired coagulopathy Evaluation of lung homogeneity in neonates and small infants during general anaesthesia using electrical impedance tomography: a prospective observational study Paediatric perioperative hypersensitivity: the performance of the current consensus formula and the effect of uneventful anaesthesia on serum tryptase. Reply to BJA Open 2024; 9: 100254 An update on iron therapy as an intervention to reduce blood transfusion for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1