Mental health prevention and promotion in general practice settings: A protocol for a feasibility study

Miranda Budd , Kathryn Gardner , Gita Bhutani , Mark Hann , Umesh Chauhan , Sophie Jaber , Irem Shabir , Valerio Benedetto , Andrew Clegg , Naim Ismail , Farah Lunat
{"title":"Mental health prevention and promotion in general practice settings: A protocol for a feasibility study","authors":"Miranda Budd ,&nbsp;Kathryn Gardner ,&nbsp;Gita Bhutani ,&nbsp;Mark Hann ,&nbsp;Umesh Chauhan ,&nbsp;Sophie Jaber ,&nbsp;Irem Shabir ,&nbsp;Valerio Benedetto ,&nbsp;Andrew Clegg ,&nbsp;Naim Ismail ,&nbsp;Farah Lunat","doi":"10.1016/j.mhp.2024.200337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A reactive approach is typically taken when addressing and intervening with mental health problems rather than a proactive or preventative one, yet preventative approaches can also reduce mental ill-health. This study protocol aims to evaluate the feasibility of recruiting general practice patients into a randomised feasibility study where they will receive either mental health treatment as usual or a brief psychological intervention for preventing the deterioration of mental health and promoting emotional wellbeing.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a two-arm RCT, where participants will be randomised to either: treatment-as-usual within GP; or treatment-as-usual within GP plus a mental health prevention and promotion intervention. Sixty patients, aged 16+ from GP surgeries, with mild to moderate mental health difficulties as indicated by the PHQ9 and GAD7 will be recruited. Data on engagement with the intervention will be summarised using descriptive statistics. Regression models will be fitted, using the 12-week post-intervention follow-up data as the outcome variable and age, gender, trial arm and the corresponding baseline data as covariates. Cost-effectiveness will be investigated in an explorative way. Descriptive statistics will be used to analyse participant's resource use and HRQoL. Qualitative data will understand factors that facilitate or challenge the successful implementation of interventions and a process evaluation will provide insight into the intervention's mechanisms of action.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The research team will progress from a feasibility RCT to a larger definitive RCT and disseminate widely across stakeholders (clinical, academic, service users, caregivers, Integrated Care Board (ICB) colleagues), ensuring accessibility in collaboration with the PPI committee.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55864,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health and Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212657024000199/pdfft?md5=db99fe71f9abff187029550f47d2e789&pid=1-s2.0-S2212657024000199-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212657024000199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

A reactive approach is typically taken when addressing and intervening with mental health problems rather than a proactive or preventative one, yet preventative approaches can also reduce mental ill-health. This study protocol aims to evaluate the feasibility of recruiting general practice patients into a randomised feasibility study where they will receive either mental health treatment as usual or a brief psychological intervention for preventing the deterioration of mental health and promoting emotional wellbeing.

Methods

This is a two-arm RCT, where participants will be randomised to either: treatment-as-usual within GP; or treatment-as-usual within GP plus a mental health prevention and promotion intervention. Sixty patients, aged 16+ from GP surgeries, with mild to moderate mental health difficulties as indicated by the PHQ9 and GAD7 will be recruited. Data on engagement with the intervention will be summarised using descriptive statistics. Regression models will be fitted, using the 12-week post-intervention follow-up data as the outcome variable and age, gender, trial arm and the corresponding baseline data as covariates. Cost-effectiveness will be investigated in an explorative way. Descriptive statistics will be used to analyse participant's resource use and HRQoL. Qualitative data will understand factors that facilitate or challenge the successful implementation of interventions and a process evaluation will provide insight into the intervention's mechanisms of action.

Discussion

The research team will progress from a feasibility RCT to a larger definitive RCT and disseminate widely across stakeholders (clinical, academic, service users, caregivers, Integrated Care Board (ICB) colleagues), ensuring accessibility in collaboration with the PPI committee.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在全科医疗机构中预防和促进心理健康:可行性研究方案
背景在处理和干预心理健康问题时,通常采取的是被动应对的方法,而不是主动或预防性的方法,然而预防性的方法也可以减少心理疾病的发生。本研究方案旨在评估招募全科医生病人参加随机可行性研究的可行性,在这项研究中,病人将接受心理健康常规治疗或简短的心理干预,以防止心理健康恶化并促进情绪健康。方法这是一项双臂 RCT 研究,参与者将被随机分配到以下两种治疗方案中:全科医生常规治疗;或全科医生常规治疗加心理健康预防和促进干预。将从全科医生诊所招募 60 名年龄在 16 岁以上、有轻度至中度心理健康问题(PHQ9 和 GAD7)的患者。参与干预的数据将通过描述性统计进行总结。将使用干预后 12 周的随访数据作为结果变量,年龄、性别、试验组和相应的基线数据作为协变量,拟合回归模型。将对成本效益进行探索性研究。描述性统计将用于分析参与者的资源使用情况和 HRQoL。定性数据将用于了解促进或挑战干预措施成功实施的因素,而过程评估将有助于深入了解干预措施的作用机制。讨论研究小组将从可行性 RCT 进展到更大规模的确定性 RCT,并在利益相关者(临床、学术、服务使用者、护理人员、综合护理委员会 (ICB) 同事)中广泛传播,同时与公众宣传委员会合作,确保可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mental Health and Prevention
Mental Health and Prevention Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
24 days
期刊最新文献
Improving resilience and mental well-being among refugees residing at asylum centers in the Netherlands: A pre-post feasibility study “It's the people that make the difference”: Understanding the significance of psychosocial support for professional athletes Parenting strategies to support adolescent mental health during a pandemic: A Delphi consensus study Whāia te iti kahurangi: Seeking perinatal mental health equity. Māori offer solutions for the health system Are younger people more accurate at identifying mental health disorders, recommending help appropriately, and do they show lower mental health stigma than older people?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1