Graduate instructors navigating the AI frontier: The role of ChatGPT in higher education

IF 4.1 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers and Education Open Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100166
Luke Parker, Chris Carter, Alice Karakas, A. Jane Loper, Ahmad Sokkar
{"title":"Graduate instructors navigating the AI frontier: The role of ChatGPT in higher education","authors":"Luke Parker,&nbsp;Chris Carter,&nbsp;Alice Karakas,&nbsp;A. Jane Loper,&nbsp;Ahmad Sokkar","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research study explores the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in undergraduate assessments, specifically focusing on the ability of graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) to identify AI-generated assessments and the performance of ChatGPT, an AI model, in producing high-quality work. The study examines four guiding research questions and hypotheses related to the accuracy of GTA identification, the achievement of AI-generated work compared to student marks, the impact of GTA characteristics on identification accuracy, and the variation in identification and assessment across different subject areas. The study incorporates ten AI-generated assessments across seven classes taught by five GTAs. The findings reveal that ChatGPT consistently excelled the average student in all classes receiving 10 scores of A or higher out of 11 and receiving the top mark in 8 of the ten classes. GTAs accurately identified 50 % of the AI-generated assessments, with results suggesting a potential connection between class size and GTA accuracy in identifying AI-generated work. GTAs with prior experience and familiarity with ChatGPT demonstrated higher accuracy in identifying AI-generated assessments. However, further research is needed to explore this comprehensively. This study also reviews the effectiveness of TurnItin's new AI detector, highlighting an accuracy of 92 % across the ten assessments. The study highlights the adaptability of ChatGPT across different subject areas and assessment types, producing assessments that align with diverse educational contexts.</p><p>In conclusion, this research study contributes to understanding the effectiveness and adaptability of AI in undergraduate assessments. It underscores the need to further explore and develop AI technologies in education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100166"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000077/pdfft?md5=f3b3541b8b8e269a1ace3c9eeede2e5a&pid=1-s2.0-S2666557324000077-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research study explores the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in undergraduate assessments, specifically focusing on the ability of graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) to identify AI-generated assessments and the performance of ChatGPT, an AI model, in producing high-quality work. The study examines four guiding research questions and hypotheses related to the accuracy of GTA identification, the achievement of AI-generated work compared to student marks, the impact of GTA characteristics on identification accuracy, and the variation in identification and assessment across different subject areas. The study incorporates ten AI-generated assessments across seven classes taught by five GTAs. The findings reveal that ChatGPT consistently excelled the average student in all classes receiving 10 scores of A or higher out of 11 and receiving the top mark in 8 of the ten classes. GTAs accurately identified 50 % of the AI-generated assessments, with results suggesting a potential connection between class size and GTA accuracy in identifying AI-generated work. GTAs with prior experience and familiarity with ChatGPT demonstrated higher accuracy in identifying AI-generated assessments. However, further research is needed to explore this comprehensively. This study also reviews the effectiveness of TurnItin's new AI detector, highlighting an accuracy of 92 % across the ten assessments. The study highlights the adaptability of ChatGPT across different subject areas and assessment types, producing assessments that align with diverse educational contexts.

In conclusion, this research study contributes to understanding the effectiveness and adaptability of AI in undergraduate assessments. It underscores the need to further explore and develop AI technologies in education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究生导师领航人工智能前沿:ChatGPT 在高等教育中的作用
本研究探讨了人工智能(AI)在本科评估中的应用,特别关注研究生助教(GTA)识别人工智能生成的评估结果的能力,以及人工智能模型 ChatGPT 在生成高质量作品方面的表现。本研究探讨了四个指导性研究问题和假设,分别涉及研究生助教识别的准确性、人工智能生成的作品与学生分数相比的成绩、研究生助教的特点对识别准确性的影响以及不同学科领域在识别和评估方面的差异。这项研究包含了由五名 GTA 执教的七个班级的十项人工智能生成的评估。研究结果表明,ChatGPT 在所有班级的表现始终优于普通学生,在 11 个班级中,有 10 个班级获得了 A 级或以上的分数,在 10 个班级中,有 8 个班级获得了最高分。GTA 准确识别了 50% 的人工智能生成的评估,结果表明班级规模与 GTA 识别人工智能生成作业的准确性之间存在潜在联系。具有 ChatGPT 使用经验和熟悉 ChatGPT 的 GTA 在识别人工智能生成的评估方面表现出更高的准确性。不过,还需要进一步的研究来全面探讨这一问题。本研究还对 TurnItin 的新人工智能检测器的有效性进行了评估,结果表明十项评估的准确率达到 92%。总之,本研究有助于了解人工智能在本科评估中的有效性和适应性。总之,这项研究有助于了解人工智能在本科生评估中的有效性和适应性,并强调了在教育领域进一步探索和开发人工智能技术的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does technology-based non-interactive teaching enhance students’ learning in the classroom? Does testing environment matter for virtual school students? What influences teachers’ implementation of ICT in early childhood education? A qualitative exploration based on an ecological-TPACK framework Middle school teachers’ implementation and perceptions of automated writing evaluation University student and instructor experiences with HyFlex learning: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1