Lacosamide extended-release capsules are bioequivalent to lacosamide immediate-release tablets: Pharmacokinetic observations and simulations

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsy Research Pub Date : 2024-03-16 DOI:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107350
James Wheless , Barry Gidal , Lixin Gong , Shaoqiong Lyu , Xun Zheng , Rong Li , Wilson Chang , Marie Tan
{"title":"Lacosamide extended-release capsules are bioequivalent to lacosamide immediate-release tablets: Pharmacokinetic observations and simulations","authors":"James Wheless ,&nbsp;Barry Gidal ,&nbsp;Lixin Gong ,&nbsp;Shaoqiong Lyu ,&nbsp;Xun Zheng ,&nbsp;Rong Li ,&nbsp;Wilson Chang ,&nbsp;Marie Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Assess the bioequivalence of lacosamide extended-release (XR) capsules and immediate-release (IR) tablets and answer real-world clinical questions regarding the use of lacosamide XR.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An open-label, randomized, two-treatment, two-sequence, oral comparative bioavailability study was conducted to assess the bioequivalence of two lacosamide formulations. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive lacosamide XR capsules (400 mg once-daily) or IR tablets (200 mg twice-daily) in 1 of 2 sequences over 7-day periods. Primary outcome was the area under the lacosamide concentration-time curve over 24 h at steady-state (AUC<sub>0-τ,ss</sub>). Secondary outcomes were maximum (C<sub>max,ss</sub>) and minimum concentrations at steady-state (C<sub>min,ss</sub>). Bioequivalence was established when 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for geometric least square means ratios (GLSMs) were between 80% and 125%. Adverse events (AEs) and other safety outcomes were also assessed. Pharmacokinetic simulations, including adherent and partially adherent dosing scenarios with XR and IR formulations, modeled the clinical use of lacosamide XR.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-five healthy adult males were enrolled in the bioequivalence study. After 7 days of study drug, mean AUC<sub>0-τ,ss</sub>, C<sub>max,ss</sub>, and C<sub>min,ss</sub> values were similar between XR and IR formulations; all 90% CIs for GLSMs were between 80% and 125%. AEs were mild and no serious AEs or other clinically significant safety findings were observed. Pharmacokinetic simulations suggested that partial adherence affected formulations similarly; and the best strategy for switching formulations was to take the morning lacosamide IR dose followed by the evening lacosamide XR dose, as this resulted in the most consistent lacosamide plasma concentrations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Once-daily lacosamide XR capsules were bioequivalent to twice-daily lacosamide IR tablets. Pharmacokinetic simulations indicated lacosamide XR and IR formulations were similarly affected by partial adherence, though once-daily dosing with lacosamide XR may offer clinical advantages, and formulations can be easily switched. These results support the use of lacosamide XR capsules as a once-daily alternative to lacosamide IR tablets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 107350"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124000652/pdfft?md5=fb190ab6bb14e6bdf5eb09f7f8631c55&pid=1-s2.0-S0920121124000652-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124000652","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Assess the bioequivalence of lacosamide extended-release (XR) capsules and immediate-release (IR) tablets and answer real-world clinical questions regarding the use of lacosamide XR.

Methods

An open-label, randomized, two-treatment, two-sequence, oral comparative bioavailability study was conducted to assess the bioequivalence of two lacosamide formulations. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive lacosamide XR capsules (400 mg once-daily) or IR tablets (200 mg twice-daily) in 1 of 2 sequences over 7-day periods. Primary outcome was the area under the lacosamide concentration-time curve over 24 h at steady-state (AUC0-τ,ss). Secondary outcomes were maximum (Cmax,ss) and minimum concentrations at steady-state (Cmin,ss). Bioequivalence was established when 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for geometric least square means ratios (GLSMs) were between 80% and 125%. Adverse events (AEs) and other safety outcomes were also assessed. Pharmacokinetic simulations, including adherent and partially adherent dosing scenarios with XR and IR formulations, modeled the clinical use of lacosamide XR.

Results

Thirty-five healthy adult males were enrolled in the bioequivalence study. After 7 days of study drug, mean AUC0-τ,ss, Cmax,ss, and Cmin,ss values were similar between XR and IR formulations; all 90% CIs for GLSMs were between 80% and 125%. AEs were mild and no serious AEs or other clinically significant safety findings were observed. Pharmacokinetic simulations suggested that partial adherence affected formulations similarly; and the best strategy for switching formulations was to take the morning lacosamide IR dose followed by the evening lacosamide XR dose, as this resulted in the most consistent lacosamide plasma concentrations.

Conclusions

Once-daily lacosamide XR capsules were bioequivalent to twice-daily lacosamide IR tablets. Pharmacokinetic simulations indicated lacosamide XR and IR formulations were similarly affected by partial adherence, though once-daily dosing with lacosamide XR may offer clinical advantages, and formulations can be easily switched. These results support the use of lacosamide XR capsules as a once-daily alternative to lacosamide IR tablets.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉科萨胺缓释胶囊与拉科萨胺速释片具有生物等效性:药代动力学观察和模拟
目的评估拉科酰胺缓释(XR)胶囊和速释(IR)片的生物等效性,并回答与拉科酰胺XR的使用有关的实际临床问题。方法开展了一项开放标签、随机、两疗程、两序列的口服生物利用度比较研究,以评估两种拉科酰胺制剂的生物等效性。参与者按1:1的比例随机接受拉科萨胺XR胶囊(400毫克,每日1次)或IR片剂(200毫克,每日2次),在7天时间内按2个顺序中的1个顺序服用。主要结果是24小时内拉科沙胺稳态浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC0-τ,ss)。次要结果是稳态时的最大浓度(Cmax,ss)和最小浓度(Cmin,ss)。当几何最小平方均值比(GLSMs)的90%置信区间(CIs)在80%和125%之间时,生物等效性即被确定。此外,还对不良事件(AE)和其他安全性结果进行了评估。药代动力学模拟包括XR和IR制剂的依从和部分依从给药方案,模拟了拉科萨胺XR的临床使用。用药7天后,XR和IR制剂的平均AUC0-τ,ss、Cmax,ss和Cmin,ss值相似;GLSM的所有90% CI均在80%和125%之间。不良反应轻微,未观察到严重不良反应或其他具有临床意义的安全性结果。药代动力学模拟表明,部分依从性对制剂的影响相似;转换制剂的最佳策略是先服用早晨的拉科萨胺IR剂量,然后服用晚上的拉科萨胺XR剂量,因为这样可获得最稳定的拉科萨胺血浆浓度。药代动力学模拟结果表明,尽管每日一次服用拉科萨胺XR可能具有临床优势,而且可以很容易地更换制剂,但部分依从性对拉科萨胺XR和IR制剂的影响相似。这些结果支持使用拉科酰胺XR胶囊作为拉科酰胺IR片剂的每日一次替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy Research
Epilepsy Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy Research provides for publication of high quality articles in both basic and clinical epilepsy research, with a special emphasis on translational research that ultimately relates to epilepsy as a human condition. The journal is intended to provide a forum for reporting the best and most rigorous epilepsy research from all disciplines ranging from biophysics and molecular biology to epidemiological and psychosocial research. As such the journal will publish original papers relevant to epilepsy from any scientific discipline and also studies of a multidisciplinary nature. Clinical and experimental research papers adopting fresh conceptual approaches to the study of epilepsy and its treatment are encouraged. The overriding criteria for publication are novelty, significant clinical or experimental relevance, and interest to a multidisciplinary audience in the broad arena of epilepsy. Review articles focused on any topic of epilepsy research will also be considered, but only if they present an exceptionally clear synthesis of current knowledge and future directions of a research area, based on a critical assessment of the available data or on hypotheses that are likely to stimulate more critical thinking and further advances in an area of epilepsy research.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Cannabis use, sleep and mood disturbances among persons with epilepsy – A clinical and polysomnography study from a Canadian tertiary care epilepsy center Evaluating the late seizures of acute encephalopathy with biphasic seizures and late reduced diffusion via monitoring using continuous electroencephalogram Validation of hemispherectomy outcome prediction scale in treatment of medically intractable epilepsy MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers of response to modified Atkins diet in treatment of adults with drug-resistant epilepsy: A proof-of-concept study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1