Post-release mortality of line-caught snapper Chrysophrys auratus depends on hook site and capture depth

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES Fisheries Management and Ecology Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1111/fme.12702
Jade Q. Maggs, Oliver Evans, John C. Holdsworth, Thomas Lumley, Bruce W. Hartill
{"title":"Post-release mortality of line-caught snapper Chrysophrys auratus depends on hook site and capture depth","authors":"Jade Q. Maggs,&nbsp;Oliver Evans,&nbsp;John C. Holdsworth,&nbsp;Thomas Lumley,&nbsp;Bruce W. Hartill","doi":"10.1111/fme.12702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Catch-and-release angling is common in recreational fisheries, but post-release mortality (PRM) may be high. We conducted a controlled field experiment to estimate mortality of released snapper <i>Chrysophrys auratus</i>. Recreational fishers caught 960 snapper from three depth strata (&lt;15, 15–25, 26–40 m) that were either lip-hooked, foul-hooked or gut-hooked. A bottom longline vessel caught 162 lip-hooked fish in shallow water to serve as controls. Fish were held in 15-m deep holding nets. All control fish and 80% of treatment fish survived, with anatomical hook site and capture depth significantly predicting mortality. Probability of mortality was lowest for lip-hooked fish in shallow water (5 m = 0.00, 95% CI [0.00, 0.03]), but increased rapidly to 20 m (0.24, 95% CI [0.2, 0.3]). Mortality of foul-hooked fish increased steadily with depth from 0.05 (95% CI [0.00, 0.78]) at 5 m to 0.65 (95% CI [0.13, 0.96]) at 40 m. Gut-hooking resulted in high mortality at all depths but a low sample size resulted in high uncertainty of estimates. Our results indicate that snapper PRM can be reduced by fishing in shallow water and by mitigating gut-hooking, possibly by using large circle hooks.</p>","PeriodicalId":50444,"journal":{"name":"Fisheries Management and Ecology","volume":"31 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fme.12702","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisheries Management and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fme.12702","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Catch-and-release angling is common in recreational fisheries, but post-release mortality (PRM) may be high. We conducted a controlled field experiment to estimate mortality of released snapper Chrysophrys auratus. Recreational fishers caught 960 snapper from three depth strata (<15, 15–25, 26–40 m) that were either lip-hooked, foul-hooked or gut-hooked. A bottom longline vessel caught 162 lip-hooked fish in shallow water to serve as controls. Fish were held in 15-m deep holding nets. All control fish and 80% of treatment fish survived, with anatomical hook site and capture depth significantly predicting mortality. Probability of mortality was lowest for lip-hooked fish in shallow water (5 m = 0.00, 95% CI [0.00, 0.03]), but increased rapidly to 20 m (0.24, 95% CI [0.2, 0.3]). Mortality of foul-hooked fish increased steadily with depth from 0.05 (95% CI [0.00, 0.78]) at 5 m to 0.65 (95% CI [0.13, 0.96]) at 40 m. Gut-hooking resulted in high mortality at all depths but a low sample size resulted in high uncertainty of estimates. Our results indicate that snapper PRM can be reduced by fishing in shallow water and by mitigating gut-hooking, possibly by using large circle hooks.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
钓线捕获的鲷鱼释放后的死亡率取决于上钩部位和捕获深度
在休闲渔业中,随捕随放的垂钓方式很常见,但释放后的死亡率(PRM)可能很高。我们进行了一项受控现场实验,以估算放生后笛鲷的死亡率。休闲渔民从三个深度层(15 米、15-25 米、26-40 米)捕获了 960 尾鲷鱼,这些鲷鱼有的被唇钩、有的被粗钩、有的被内脏钩住。一艘底层延绳钓船在浅水区捕获了 162 条唇钩鱼作为对照。鱼被关在 15 米深的暂养网中。所有对照组鱼类和 80% 的处理鱼类都存活了下来,解剖钩部位和捕获深度可显著预测死亡率。唇钩鱼在浅水区的死亡率最低(5 米 = 0.00,95% CI [0.00,0.03]),但在 20 米处死亡率迅速上升(0.24,95% CI [0.2,0.3])。随着深度的增加,误钩鱼的死亡率从 5 米处的 0.05 (95% CI [0.00, 0.78])增加到 40 米处的 0.65 (95% CI [0.13, 0.96])。我们的研究结果表明,通过在浅水区捕捞和减少肠道钩挂(可能通过使用大圆钩),可以降低鲷鱼的死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fisheries Management and Ecology
Fisheries Management and Ecology 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Fisheries Management and Ecology is a journal with an international perspective. It presents papers that cover all aspects of the management, ecology and conservation of inland, estuarine and coastal fisheries. The Journal aims to: foster an understanding of the maintenance, development and management of the conditions under which fish populations and communities thrive, and how they and their habitat can be conserved and enhanced; promote a thorough understanding of the dual nature of fisheries as valuable resources exploited for food, recreational and commercial purposes and as pivotal indicators of aquatic habitat quality and conservation status; help fisheries managers focus upon policy, management, operational, conservation and ecological issues; assist fisheries ecologists become more aware of the needs of managers for information, techniques, tools and concepts; integrate ecological studies with all aspects of management; ensure that the conservation of fisheries and their environments is a recurring theme in fisheries and aquatic management.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information KRILLSCAN: An automated open‐source software for processing and analysis of echosounder data from the Antarctic krill fishery Differences in fisher demographics and fishing behaviour from concurrent phone‐recall and smartphone app surveys of recreational angling in south‐western Australia Effectiveness of mass marking of juvenile sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus) with alizarin red S stain on field detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1