GNSS gyroscopes: determination of angular velocity and acceleration with very high-rate GNSS

IF 9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE Satellite Navigation Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1186/s43020-024-00130-z
Yun Shi, Peiliang Xu, Yuanming Shu, Xiaolin Meng
{"title":"GNSS gyroscopes: determination of angular velocity and acceleration with very high-rate GNSS","authors":"Yun Shi, Peiliang Xu, Yuanming Shu, Xiaolin Meng","doi":"10.1186/s43020-024-00130-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) have been routinely applied to determine attitudes, there exists no literature on determining angular velocity and/or angular acceleration from GNSS. Motivated by the invention of computerized accelerometers of the correspondence author and following the success of accurately recovering translational velocity and acceleration waveforms from very high-rate GNSS precise positioning by Xu and his collaborators in 2021, we propose the concept of GNSS gyroscopes and reconstruct angular velocity and acceleration from very high-rate GNSS attitudes by applying regularization under the criterion of minimum mean squared errors. The major results from the experiments can be summarized in the following: (i) angular velocity and acceleration waveforms computed by applying the difference methods to high-rate GNSS attitudes are too noisy and can be physically not meaningful and numerically incorrect. The same can be said about inertial measurement unit (IMU) attitudes, if IMU gyros are not of very high accuracy; (ii) regularization is successfully applied to reconstruct the high-rate angular velocity and acceleration waveforms from 50 Hz GNSS attitudes and significantly outperforms the difference methods, validating the proposed concept of GNSS gyroscopes. By comparing the angular velocity and acceleration results by using the difference methods and regularization, we find that the peak values of angular velocity and acceleration by regularization are much smaller by a maximum factor of 1.57 in the angular velocity to a maximum factor of 8662.53 times in the angular acceleration in the case of high-rate GNSS, and by a maximum factor of 1.26 in the angular velocity to a maximum factor of 2819.85 times in the angular acceleration in the case of IMU, respectively; and (iii) the IMU attitudes apparently lead to better regularized angular velocity and acceleration waveforms than the high-rate GNSS attitudes, which can well be explained by the fact that the former is of better accuracy than the latter. As a result, to suppress the significant amplification of noise in GNSS attitudes, larger regularization parameters have to be chosen for the high-rate GNSS attitudes, resulting in smaller peak angular accelerations by a maximum factor of 37.55 percent in the angular velocity to a maximum factor of 6.20 times in the angular acceleration in comparison of the corresponding IMU results. Nevertheless, the regularized angular acceleration waveforms for both GNSS and IMU look more or less similar in pattern or waveform shape.","PeriodicalId":52643,"journal":{"name":"Satellite Navigation","volume":"159 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Satellite Navigation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43020-024-00130-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) have been routinely applied to determine attitudes, there exists no literature on determining angular velocity and/or angular acceleration from GNSS. Motivated by the invention of computerized accelerometers of the correspondence author and following the success of accurately recovering translational velocity and acceleration waveforms from very high-rate GNSS precise positioning by Xu and his collaborators in 2021, we propose the concept of GNSS gyroscopes and reconstruct angular velocity and acceleration from very high-rate GNSS attitudes by applying regularization under the criterion of minimum mean squared errors. The major results from the experiments can be summarized in the following: (i) angular velocity and acceleration waveforms computed by applying the difference methods to high-rate GNSS attitudes are too noisy and can be physically not meaningful and numerically incorrect. The same can be said about inertial measurement unit (IMU) attitudes, if IMU gyros are not of very high accuracy; (ii) regularization is successfully applied to reconstruct the high-rate angular velocity and acceleration waveforms from 50 Hz GNSS attitudes and significantly outperforms the difference methods, validating the proposed concept of GNSS gyroscopes. By comparing the angular velocity and acceleration results by using the difference methods and regularization, we find that the peak values of angular velocity and acceleration by regularization are much smaller by a maximum factor of 1.57 in the angular velocity to a maximum factor of 8662.53 times in the angular acceleration in the case of high-rate GNSS, and by a maximum factor of 1.26 in the angular velocity to a maximum factor of 2819.85 times in the angular acceleration in the case of IMU, respectively; and (iii) the IMU attitudes apparently lead to better regularized angular velocity and acceleration waveforms than the high-rate GNSS attitudes, which can well be explained by the fact that the former is of better accuracy than the latter. As a result, to suppress the significant amplification of noise in GNSS attitudes, larger regularization parameters have to be chosen for the high-rate GNSS attitudes, resulting in smaller peak angular accelerations by a maximum factor of 37.55 percent in the angular velocity to a maximum factor of 6.20 times in the angular acceleration in comparison of the corresponding IMU results. Nevertheless, the regularized angular acceleration waveforms for both GNSS and IMU look more or less similar in pattern or waveform shape.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球导航卫星系统陀螺仪:利用极高速率全球导航卫星系统确定角速度和加速度
虽然全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)已被常规应用于确定姿态,但目前还没有从 GNSS 确定角速度和/或角加速度的文献。在通信作者发明计算机加速度计的推动下,继 2021 年 Xu 及其合作者成功地从极高速率的全球导航卫星系统精确定位中精确恢复平移速度和加速度波形之后,我们提出了全球导航卫星系统陀螺仪的概念,并在均方误差最小的准则下通过应用正则化,从极高速率的全球导航卫星系统姿态中重建角速度和角加速度。实验的主要结果可归纳如下:(i) 对高速率全球导航卫星系统姿态应用差分方法计算出的角速度和加速度波 形噪声太大,可能在物理上没有意义,在数值上也不正确。如果惯性测量单元(IMU)陀螺仪精度不高,惯性测量单元(IMU)姿态也会出现同样的问题;(ii) 正则化成功地应用于从 50 Hz GNSS 姿态重建高速率角速度和加速度波形,其效果明显优于差分法,验证了所提出的 GNSS 陀螺仪概念。通过比较使用差分法和正则化法得到的角速度和加速度结果,我们发现正则化法得到的角速度和加速度峰值要小得多,在高速率 GNSS 的情况下,角速度峰值最大为 1.57 倍,角加速度峰值最大为 8662.53 倍,角速度峰值最大为 1.(iii)与高速率 GNSS 的姿态相比,IMU 的姿态显然能产生更好的正则化角速度和加速度波形,这完全可以用前者的精度比后者高这一事实来解释。因此,为了抑制全球导航卫星系统姿态中噪声的显著放大,必须为高速率全球导航卫星系统姿态选择更大的正则化参数,从而使角加速度峰值变小,与相应的 IMU 结果相比,角速度最大减小 37.55%,角加速度最大减小 6.20 倍。尽管如此,全球导航卫星系统和 IMU 的正则化角加速度波形在模式或波形形状上大致相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
25
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Satellite Navigation is dedicated to presenting innovative ideas, new findings, and advancements in the theoretical techniques and applications of satellite navigation. The journal actively invites original articles, reviews, and commentaries to contribute to the exploration and dissemination of knowledge in this field.
期刊最新文献
A novel global grid model for soil moisture retrieval considering geographical disparity in spaceborne GNSS-R Analysis of the gain factors of 5G-assisted BDS RTK positioning in urban environments A dual-base station constraint method to improve deformation monitoring precision consistency in strip regions High-precision GPS orbit determination by integrating the measurements from regional ground stations and LEO onboard receivers Multi-frequency smartphone positioning performance evaluation: insights into A-GNSS PPP-B2b services and beyond
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1