Amanda L. Giordano, Lisa E. Hedden, Sung Woo Kim, Lindsay A. Lundeen, Zhenqiu Lu
{"title":"Childhood trauma and sex addiction among adult men","authors":"Amanda L. Giordano, Lisa E. Hedden, Sung Woo Kim, Lindsay A. Lundeen, Zhenqiu Lu","doi":"10.1002/jaoc.12134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study explored the relationship between childhood trauma and sex addiction among a sample of adult men (<i>N</i> = 149). Thirty-eight (25.5%) men screened positive for sex addiction, whereas 111 (74.5%) did not. Using descriptive discriminant analysis, we found that four subscales of early trauma predicted risk of sex addiction group membership to varying degrees, accounting for 22.3% of the variance explained. Sexual and emotional abuse accounted for the most variance explained in the group differences, whereas physical abuse and, to a lesser extent, general trauma also contributed to the group differences. Implications of the study findings are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":43029,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ADDICTIONS & OFFENDER COUNSELING","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ADDICTIONS & OFFENDER COUNSELING","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jaoc.12134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study explored the relationship between childhood trauma and sex addiction among a sample of adult men (N = 149). Thirty-eight (25.5%) men screened positive for sex addiction, whereas 111 (74.5%) did not. Using descriptive discriminant analysis, we found that four subscales of early trauma predicted risk of sex addiction group membership to varying degrees, accounting for 22.3% of the variance explained. Sexual and emotional abuse accounted for the most variance explained in the group differences, whereas physical abuse and, to a lesser extent, general trauma also contributed to the group differences. Implications of the study findings are discussed.