Assessment of working capital management efficiency – a two-stage slack-based measure of data envelopment analysis

IF 1.9 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Managerial Finance Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1108/mf-08-2020-0432
Himanshu Seth, Deepak Deepak, Namita Ruparel, Saurabh Chadha, Shivi Agarwal
{"title":"Assessment of working capital management efficiency – a two-stage slack-based measure of data envelopment analysis","authors":"Himanshu Seth, Deepak Deepak, Namita Ruparel, Saurabh Chadha, Shivi Agarwal","doi":"10.1108/mf-08-2020-0432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to assess the efficiency of managing working capital in 1,388 Indian manufacturing firms from 2008 to 2019 and investigate the effects of firm-specific and macro-level determinants on working capital management (WCM) efficiency.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The current study accommodates a slack-based measure (SBM) in data envelopment analysis (DEA) for computing WCM efficiency. Further, we implement a panel data fixed-effects model that controls for heterogeneity across firms in determining the relationships of selected variables with WCM efficiency.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results highlight that manufacturing firms operate at around 50 percent efficiency, which is constant throughout the study period. Furthermore, among the selected variables, yield, earnings, age, size, ability to create internal resources, interest rate and gross domestic product (GDP) significantly affect WCM efficiency.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Instead of the traditional models used for assessing efficiency, the SBM-DEA model is unit-invariant and monotone for slacks, implying that it can handle zero and negative data, which overcomes the incapability of prior DEA models. Hence, this provides accurate efficiency scores for robust analysis. Additionally, this paper provides a holistic working capital model recognizing firm-specific and macro-level determinants for a more explicit estimation of the relationship between WCM efficiency and the selected determinants.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":18140,"journal":{"name":"Managerial Finance","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-08-2020-0432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to assess the efficiency of managing working capital in 1,388 Indian manufacturing firms from 2008 to 2019 and investigate the effects of firm-specific and macro-level determinants on working capital management (WCM) efficiency.

Design/methodology/approach

The current study accommodates a slack-based measure (SBM) in data envelopment analysis (DEA) for computing WCM efficiency. Further, we implement a panel data fixed-effects model that controls for heterogeneity across firms in determining the relationships of selected variables with WCM efficiency.

Findings

The results highlight that manufacturing firms operate at around 50 percent efficiency, which is constant throughout the study period. Furthermore, among the selected variables, yield, earnings, age, size, ability to create internal resources, interest rate and gross domestic product (GDP) significantly affect WCM efficiency.

Originality/value

Instead of the traditional models used for assessing efficiency, the SBM-DEA model is unit-invariant and monotone for slacks, implying that it can handle zero and negative data, which overcomes the incapability of prior DEA models. Hence, this provides accurate efficiency scores for robust analysis. Additionally, this paper provides a holistic working capital model recognizing firm-specific and macro-level determinants for a more explicit estimation of the relationship between WCM efficiency and the selected determinants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
营运资金管理效率评估--基于数据包络分析的两阶段松弛度量法
本研究旨在评估 2008 年至 2019 年间 1388 家印度制造企业的营运资金管理效率,并调查企业特定因素和宏观层面的决定因素对营运资金管理效率的影响。此外,我们还采用了面板数据固定效应模型,该模型在确定选定变量与 WCM 效率的关系时控制了企业间的异质性。研究结果结果表明,制造业企业的运营效率约为 50%,在整个研究期间保持不变。此外,在所选变量中,产量、收益、年龄、规模、创造内部资源的能力、利率和国内生产总值(GDP)都会对 WCM 效率产生重大影响。原创性/价值与传统的效率评估模型相比,SBM-DEA 模型具有单位不变性和松弛单调性,这意味着它可以处理零数据和负数据,从而克服了之前 DEA 模型的不足。因此,这为稳健分析提供了准确的效率得分。此外,本文还提供了一个整体营运资本模型,该模型认识到了企业的特定决定因素和宏观层面的决定因素,从而更清晰地估算了世界工厂管理效率与所选决定因素之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Managerial Finance
Managerial Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Managerial Finance provides an international forum for the publication of high quality and topical research in the area of finance, such as corporate finance, financial management, financial markets and institutions, international finance, banking, insurance and risk management, real estate and financial education. Theoretical and empirical research is welcome as well as cross-disciplinary work, such as papers investigating the relationship of finance with other sectors.
期刊最新文献
The effects of FinTech adoption on bank loan spreads Twitter-based economic uncertainties and time-frequency connectedness among cryptocurrencies Charity begins at the office: issuing cheap stock and stock options to employees and insiders before going public Corporate spin-offs and stock performance: a comparative study of pure and composite schemes Dividend omissions and dividend cuts behaviour: a dynamic random-effect probit panel regression analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1