Co-inoculation with novel nodule-inhabiting bacteria reduces the benefits of legume-rhizobium symbiosis.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1139/cjm-2023-0209
James C Kosmopoulos, Rebecca T Batstone-Doyle, Katy D Heath
{"title":"Co-inoculation with novel nodule-inhabiting bacteria reduces the benefits of legume-rhizobium symbiosis.","authors":"James C Kosmopoulos, Rebecca T Batstone-Doyle, Katy D Heath","doi":"10.1139/cjm-2023-0209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ecologically and economically vital symbiosis between nitrogen-fixing rhizobia and leguminous plants is often thought of as a bi-partite interaction, yet studies increasingly show the prevalence of non-rhizobial endophytes (NREs) that occupy nodules alongside rhizobia. Yet, what impact these NREs have on plant or rhizobium fitness remains unclear. Here, we investigated four NRE strains found to naturally co-occupy nodules of the legume <i>Medicago truncatula</i> alongside <i>Sinorhizobium meliloti</i> in native soils. Our objectives were to (1) examine the direct and indirect effects of NREs on <i>M. truncatula</i> and <i>S. meliloti</i> fitness, and (2) determine whether NREs can re-colonize root and nodule tissues upon reinoculation. We identified one NRE strain (522) as a novel <i>Paenibacillus</i> species, another strain (717A) as a novel <i>Bacillus</i> species, and the other two (702A and 733B) as novel <i>Pseudomonas</i> species. Additionally, we found that two NREs (Bacillus 717A and Pseudomonas 733B) reduced the fitness benefits obtained from symbiosis for both partners, while the other two (522, 702A) had little effect. Lastly, we found that NREs were able to co-infect host tissues alongside <i>S. meliloti</i>. This study demonstrates that variation of NREs present in natural populations must be considered to better understand legume-rhizobium dynamics in soil communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2023-0209","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ecologically and economically vital symbiosis between nitrogen-fixing rhizobia and leguminous plants is often thought of as a bi-partite interaction, yet studies increasingly show the prevalence of non-rhizobial endophytes (NREs) that occupy nodules alongside rhizobia. Yet, what impact these NREs have on plant or rhizobium fitness remains unclear. Here, we investigated four NRE strains found to naturally co-occupy nodules of the legume Medicago truncatula alongside Sinorhizobium meliloti in native soils. Our objectives were to (1) examine the direct and indirect effects of NREs on M. truncatula and S. meliloti fitness, and (2) determine whether NREs can re-colonize root and nodule tissues upon reinoculation. We identified one NRE strain (522) as a novel Paenibacillus species, another strain (717A) as a novel Bacillus species, and the other two (702A and 733B) as novel Pseudomonas species. Additionally, we found that two NREs (Bacillus 717A and Pseudomonas 733B) reduced the fitness benefits obtained from symbiosis for both partners, while the other two (522, 702A) had little effect. Lastly, we found that NREs were able to co-infect host tissues alongside S. meliloti. This study demonstrates that variation of NREs present in natural populations must be considered to better understand legume-rhizobium dynamics in soil communities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与新型结核栖息菌共同接种会降低豆科-根瘤菌共生的益处。
固氮根瘤菌与豆科植物之间在生态和经济上至关重要的共生关系通常被认为是一种双边互动关系,但越来越多的研究表明,非根瘤菌内生体(NRE)与根瘤菌一起占据着结核。然而,这些 NRE 对植物或根瘤菌的适应性有何影响仍不清楚。在这里,我们研究了在原生土壤中发现的与瓜萎镰刀菌(Sinorhizobium meliloti)一起自然占据豆科植物美智子(Medicago truncatula)结核的四种 NRE 菌株。我们的目标是:(1)研究 NRE 对 M. truncatula 和 S. meliloti 适应性的直接和间接影响;(2)确定 NRE 是否能在重新接种后重新定殖根部和结核组织。我们鉴定出一株 NRE 菌株(522)为新型芽孢杆菌(Paenibacillus),另一株(717A)为新型芽孢杆菌(Bacillus),另外两株(702A 和 733B)为新型假单胞菌(Pseudomonas)。此外,我们还发现,两种 NRE(芽孢杆菌 717A 和假单胞菌 733B)降低了共生双方从共生中获得的适合度收益,而另外两种 NRE(522、702A)则影响甚微。最后,我们发现 NREs 能够与 S. meliloti 共同感染宿主组织。这项研究表明,要更好地了解土壤群落中豆科-根瘤菌的动态,就必须考虑自然种群中存在的 NREs 的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1