Knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and barriers pertaining to genetic literacy among surgeons: a scoping review.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Canadian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-03-19 Print Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1503/cjs.001523
Zuhaib M Mir, Linda Y N Fei, Sandra McKeown, Rachelle Dinchong, Nicholas Cofie, Nancy Dalgarno, Alison Rusnak, Rona E Cheifetz, Shaila J Merchant
{"title":"Knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and barriers pertaining to genetic literacy among surgeons: a scoping review.","authors":"Zuhaib M Mir, Linda Y N Fei, Sandra McKeown, Rachelle Dinchong, Nicholas Cofie, Nancy Dalgarno, Alison Rusnak, Rona E Cheifetz, Shaila J Merchant","doi":"10.1503/cjs.001523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rapid evolution of genetic technologies and utilization of genetic information for clinical decision-making has necessitated increased surgeon participation in genetic counselling, testing, and appropriate referral of patients for genetic services, without formal training in genetics. We performed a scoping review to describe surgeons' knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and barriers pertaining to genetic literacy in the management of patients who had confirmed cancer or who were potentially genetically at risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. We performed a comprehensive literature search, and 2 reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion. These studies included surgeons involved in the care of patients with confirmed gastrointestinal, breast, and endocrine and neuroendocrine cancers, or patients who were potentially genetically at risk for these cancers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 17 studies, all of which used survey or interview-based formats. Many surgeons engaged in genetic counselling, testing, and referral, but reported low confidence and comfort in doing so. Knowledge assessments showed lower confidence in identifying genetic inheritance patterns and hereditary cancer syndromes, but awareness was higher among surgeons with greater clinical volume or subspecialty training in oncology. Surgeons felt responsible for facilitating these services and explicitly requested educational support in genetics. Barriers to genetic literacy were identified and catalogued at patient, surgeon, and system levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgeons frequently engage in genetics-related tasks despite a lack of formal genetics training, and often report low knowledge, comfort, and confidence in providing such services. We have identified several barriers to genetic literacy that can be used to develop interventions to enhance genetic literacy among surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"67 2","pages":"E118-E127"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10959449/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.001523","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The rapid evolution of genetic technologies and utilization of genetic information for clinical decision-making has necessitated increased surgeon participation in genetic counselling, testing, and appropriate referral of patients for genetic services, without formal training in genetics. We performed a scoping review to describe surgeons' knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and barriers pertaining to genetic literacy in the management of patients who had confirmed cancer or who were potentially genetically at risk.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. We performed a comprehensive literature search, and 2 reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion. These studies included surgeons involved in the care of patients with confirmed gastrointestinal, breast, and endocrine and neuroendocrine cancers, or patients who were potentially genetically at risk for these cancers.

Results: We analyzed 17 studies, all of which used survey or interview-based formats. Many surgeons engaged in genetic counselling, testing, and referral, but reported low confidence and comfort in doing so. Knowledge assessments showed lower confidence in identifying genetic inheritance patterns and hereditary cancer syndromes, but awareness was higher among surgeons with greater clinical volume or subspecialty training in oncology. Surgeons felt responsible for facilitating these services and explicitly requested educational support in genetics. Barriers to genetic literacy were identified and catalogued at patient, surgeon, and system levels.

Conclusion: Surgeons frequently engage in genetics-related tasks despite a lack of formal genetics training, and often report low knowledge, comfort, and confidence in providing such services. We have identified several barriers to genetic literacy that can be used to develop interventions to enhance genetic literacy among surgeons.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外科医生对遗传知识的了解、看法、态度和障碍:范围界定综述。
背景:遗传学技术的快速发展和遗传信息在临床决策中的应用,使得外科医生有必要更多地参与遗传咨询、检测和适当转诊病人接受遗传学服务,而无需接受正规的遗传学培训。我们进行了一次范围界定审查,以描述外科医生在管理确诊癌症或有潜在遗传风险的患者时对遗传知识的了解、认知、态度和障碍:我们根据 "系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目扩展范围综述 "清单进行了范围界定综述。我们进行了全面的文献检索,并由两名审稿人独立筛选纳入研究。这些研究的对象包括参与治疗确诊胃肠道癌、乳腺癌、内分泌癌和神经内分泌癌患者的外科医生,或具有这些癌症潜在遗传风险的患者:我们分析了 17 项研究,所有研究都采用了调查或访谈的形式。许多外科医生参与了遗传咨询、检测和转诊,但报告称他们对这样做的信心和舒适度较低。知识评估显示,外科医生对识别遗传模式和遗传性癌症综合征的信心较低,但临床量较大或接受过肿瘤学亚专业培训的外科医生对遗传模式和遗传性癌症综合征的认识较高。外科医生认为自己有责任促进这些服务,并明确要求遗传学方面的教育支持。研究人员从患者、外科医生和系统三个层面对遗传学知识普及的障碍进行了识别和编目:结论:尽管外科医生缺乏正规的遗传学培训,但他们经常从事与遗传学相关的工作,而且常常表示对提供此类服务的知识、舒适度和信心不足。我们发现了遗传学知识普及的几个障碍,可用于制定干预措施,提高外科医生的遗传学知识普及水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of CJS is to contribute to the meaningful continuing medical education of Canadian surgical specialists, and to provide surgeons with an effective vehicle for the dissemination of observations in the areas of clinical and basic science research.
期刊最新文献
Canadian Spine Society: 24th Annual Scientific Conference, Wednesday, February 28 - Saturday, March 2, Fairmont Chateau Whistler, Whistler, B.C., Canada. Reasons for 90-day emergency department visits after primary knee arthroplasty. Re-excision rates after breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer: an Albertan perspective. Perceptions of readiness for independent practice among graduating orthopedic surgery residents in Ontario in the last 30 years. Injury and violence in the context of sustainable development: The first Bethune Round Table in Africa, Bethune Round Table 2024, Conference on Global Surgery, May 16-18, 2024, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1