A randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled trial of a two-week course of dexamethasone for adult patients with a symptomatic Chronic Subdural Haematoma (Dex-CSDH trial).

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health technology assessment Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.3310/XWZN4832
Peter J Hutchinson, Ellie Edlmann, John G Hanrahan, Diederik Bulters, Ardalan Zolnourian, Patrick Holton, Nigel Suttner, Kevin Agyemang, Simon Thomson, Ian A Anderson, Yahia Al-Tamimi, Duncan Henderson, Peter Whitfield, Monica Gherle, Paul M Brennan, Annabel Allison, Eric P Thelin, Silvia Tarantino, Beatrice Pantaleo, Karen Caldwell, Carol Davis-Wilkie, Harry Mee, Elizabeth A Warburton, Garry Barton, Aswin Chari, Hani J Marcus, Sarah Pyne, Andrew T King, Antonio Belli, Phyo K Myint, Ian Wilkinson, Thomas Santarius, Carole Turner, Simon Bond, Angelos G Kolias
{"title":"A randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled trial of a two-week course of dexamethasone for adult patients with a symptomatic Chronic Subdural Haematoma (Dex-CSDH trial).","authors":"Peter J Hutchinson, Ellie Edlmann, John G Hanrahan, Diederik Bulters, Ardalan Zolnourian, Patrick Holton, Nigel Suttner, Kevin Agyemang, Simon Thomson, Ian A Anderson, Yahia Al-Tamimi, Duncan Henderson, Peter Whitfield, Monica Gherle, Paul M Brennan, Annabel Allison, Eric P Thelin, Silvia Tarantino, Beatrice Pantaleo, Karen Caldwell, Carol Davis-Wilkie, Harry Mee, Elizabeth A Warburton, Garry Barton, Aswin Chari, Hani J Marcus, Sarah Pyne, Andrew T King, Antonio Belli, Phyo K Myint, Ian Wilkinson, Thomas Santarius, Carole Turner, Simon Bond, Angelos G Kolias","doi":"10.3310/XWZN4832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic subdural haematoma is a collection of 'old blood' and its breakdown products in the subdural space and predominantly affects older people. Surgical evacuation remains the mainstay in the management of symptomatic cases.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Dex-CSDH (DEXamethasone in Chronic SubDural Haematoma) randomised trial investigated the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dexamethasone in patients with a symptomatic chronic subdural haematoma.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a parallel, superiority, multicentre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Assigned treatment was administered in a double-blind fashion. Outcome assessors were also blinded to treatment allocation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Neurosurgical units in the UK.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Eligible participants included adults (aged ≥ 18 years) admitted to a neurosurgical unit with a symptomatic chronic subdural haematoma confirmed on cranial imaging.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants were randomly assigned in a 1 : 1 allocation to a 2-week tapering course of dexamethasone or placebo alongside standard care.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the Modified Rankin Scale score at 6 months dichotomised to a favourable (score of 0-3) or an unfavourable (score of 4-6) outcome. Secondary outcomes included the Modified Rankin Scale score at discharge and 3 months; number of chronic subdural haematoma-related surgical interventions undertaken during the index and subsequent admissions; Barthel Index and EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level utility index score reported at discharge, 3 months and 6 months; Glasgow Coma Scale score reported at discharge and 6 months; mortality at 30 days and 6 months; length of stay; discharge destination; and adverse events. An economic evaluation was also undertaken, during which the net monetary benefit was estimated at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 748 patients were included after randomisation: 375 were assigned to dexamethasone and 373 were assigned to placebo. The mean age of the patients was 74 years and 94% underwent evacuation of their chronic subdural haematoma during the trial period. A total of 680 patients (91%) had 6-month primary outcome data available for analysis: 339 in the placebo arm and 341 in the dexamethasone arm. On a modified intention-to-treat analysis of the full study population, there was an absolute reduction in the proportion of favourable outcomes of 6.4% (95% confidence interval 11.4% to 1.4%; <i>p</i> = 0.01) in the dexamethasone arm compared with the control arm at 6 months. At 3 months, the between-group difference was also in favour of placebo (-8.2%, 95% confidence interval -13.3% to -3.1%). Serious adverse events occurred in 60 out of 375 (16.0%) in the dexamethasone arm and 24 out of 373 (6.4%) in the placebo arm. The net monetary benefit of dexamethasone compared with placebo was estimated to be -£97.19.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This trial reports a higher rate of unfavourable outcomes at 6 months, and a higher rate of serious adverse events, in the dexamethasone arm than in the placebo arm. Dexamethasone was also not estimated to be cost-effective. Therefore, dexamethasone cannot be recommended for the treatment of chronic subdural haematoma in this population group.</p><p><strong>Future work and limitations: </strong>A total of 94% of individuals underwent surgery, meaning that this trial does not fully define the role of dexamethasone in conservatively managed haematomas, which is a potential area for future study.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial is registered as ISRCTN80782810.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 13/15/02) and is published in full in <i>Health Technology Assessment</i>; Vol. 28, No. 12. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.</p>","PeriodicalId":12898,"journal":{"name":"Health technology assessment","volume":"28 12","pages":"1-122"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11017629/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health technology assessment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/XWZN4832","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic subdural haematoma is a collection of 'old blood' and its breakdown products in the subdural space and predominantly affects older people. Surgical evacuation remains the mainstay in the management of symptomatic cases.

Objective: The Dex-CSDH (DEXamethasone in Chronic SubDural Haematoma) randomised trial investigated the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dexamethasone in patients with a symptomatic chronic subdural haematoma.

Design: This was a parallel, superiority, multicentre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Assigned treatment was administered in a double-blind fashion. Outcome assessors were also blinded to treatment allocation.

Setting: Neurosurgical units in the UK.

Participants: Eligible participants included adults (aged ≥ 18 years) admitted to a neurosurgical unit with a symptomatic chronic subdural haematoma confirmed on cranial imaging.

Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned in a 1 : 1 allocation to a 2-week tapering course of dexamethasone or placebo alongside standard care.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the Modified Rankin Scale score at 6 months dichotomised to a favourable (score of 0-3) or an unfavourable (score of 4-6) outcome. Secondary outcomes included the Modified Rankin Scale score at discharge and 3 months; number of chronic subdural haematoma-related surgical interventions undertaken during the index and subsequent admissions; Barthel Index and EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level utility index score reported at discharge, 3 months and 6 months; Glasgow Coma Scale score reported at discharge and 6 months; mortality at 30 days and 6 months; length of stay; discharge destination; and adverse events. An economic evaluation was also undertaken, during which the net monetary benefit was estimated at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year.

Results: A total of 748 patients were included after randomisation: 375 were assigned to dexamethasone and 373 were assigned to placebo. The mean age of the patients was 74 years and 94% underwent evacuation of their chronic subdural haematoma during the trial period. A total of 680 patients (91%) had 6-month primary outcome data available for analysis: 339 in the placebo arm and 341 in the dexamethasone arm. On a modified intention-to-treat analysis of the full study population, there was an absolute reduction in the proportion of favourable outcomes of 6.4% (95% confidence interval 11.4% to 1.4%; p = 0.01) in the dexamethasone arm compared with the control arm at 6 months. At 3 months, the between-group difference was also in favour of placebo (-8.2%, 95% confidence interval -13.3% to -3.1%). Serious adverse events occurred in 60 out of 375 (16.0%) in the dexamethasone arm and 24 out of 373 (6.4%) in the placebo arm. The net monetary benefit of dexamethasone compared with placebo was estimated to be -£97.19.

Conclusions: This trial reports a higher rate of unfavourable outcomes at 6 months, and a higher rate of serious adverse events, in the dexamethasone arm than in the placebo arm. Dexamethasone was also not estimated to be cost-effective. Therefore, dexamethasone cannot be recommended for the treatment of chronic subdural haematoma in this population group.

Future work and limitations: A total of 94% of individuals underwent surgery, meaning that this trial does not fully define the role of dexamethasone in conservatively managed haematomas, which is a potential area for future study.

Trial registration: This trial is registered as ISRCTN80782810.

Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 13/15/02) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 12. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对有症状的慢性硬膜下血肿成年患者进行为期两周的地塞米松治疗的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验(Dex-CSDH 试验)。
背景:慢性硬膜下血肿是硬膜下间隙中 "陈旧血液 "及其分解产物的聚集,主要影响老年人。手术清除仍是治疗无症状病例的主要方法:Dex-CSDH(地塞米松治疗慢性硬膜下血肿)随机试验调查了地塞米松对有症状的慢性硬膜下血肿患者的临床疗效和成本效益:这是一项平行、优越性、多中心、务实、随机对照试验。指定治疗以双盲方式进行。结果评估者对治疗分配也是双盲的:参与者:英国的神经外科单位:符合条件的参与者包括神经外科病房收治的成年人(年龄≥ 18 岁),头颅影像学检查证实他们患有无症状慢性硬膜下血肿:参与者按1:1随机分配到地塞米松或安慰剂的2周渐进疗程,同时接受标准护理:主要结果为6个月时的改良朗肯量表评分,分为良好(0-3分)或不良(4-6分)结果。次要结果包括:出院时和 3 个月时的改良朗肯量表评分;入院时和入院后进行的慢性硬膜下血肿相关手术干预次数;出院时、3 个月时和 6 个月时的 Barthel 指数和 EuroQol 5 维 5 级效用指数评分;出院时和 6 个月时的格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分;30 天和 6 个月时的死亡率;住院时间;出院目的地;以及不良事件。此外,还进行了一项经济评估,按照每质量调整生命年 20,000 英镑的支付意愿临界值估算了净经济效益:结果:经过随机分配,共有 748 名患者接受了治疗:375名患者被分配使用地塞米松,373名患者被分配使用安慰剂。患者的平均年龄为 74 岁,94% 的患者在试验期间接受了慢性硬膜下血肿清除术。共有 680 名患者(91%)的 6 个月主要结果数据可供分析:安慰剂组 339 人,地塞米松组 341 人。在对全部研究对象进行修改后的意向治疗分析后发现,与对照组相比,地塞米松治疗组在6个月时有利结果的比例绝对值降低了6.4%(95%置信区间为11.4%至1.4%;P = 0.01)。在3个月时,安慰剂的组间差异也为-8.2%(95%置信区间为-13.3%至-3.1%)。地塞米松治疗组的 375 例患者中有 60 例(16.0%)发生了严重不良事件,安慰剂治疗组的 373 例患者中有 24 例(6.4%)发生了严重不良事件。与安慰剂相比,地塞米松的净经济效益估计为-97.19英镑:该试验报告显示,与安慰剂组相比,地塞米松治疗组在6个月时的不良反应发生率更高,严重不良事件发生率也更高。地塞米松的成本效益估计也不高。因此,不能推荐地塞米松用于治疗该人群中的慢性硬膜下血肿:共有94%的患者接受了手术治疗,这意味着该试验并未完全确定地塞米松在保守治疗血肿中的作用,这也是未来研究的一个潜在领域:该试验的注册号为 ISRCTN80782810:该奖项由美国国家健康与护理研究所(NIHR)健康技术评估项目资助(NIHR奖项编号:13/15/02),全文发表于《健康技术评估》第28卷第12期。更多奖项信息,请参阅 NIHR Funding and Awards 网站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health technology assessment
Health technology assessment 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Technology Assessment (HTA) publishes research information on the effectiveness, costs and broader impact of health technologies for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS.
期刊最新文献
A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of anti-VEGF drugs for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Public and patient involvement (PPI) in the design, execution and dissemination of a trial: the BISTRO trial. Development of a clinical decision support tool for Primary care Management of lower Urinary tract Symptoms in men: the PriMUS study. Multi-cancer early detection tests for general population screening: a systematic literature review. Energetic activity for depression in young people aged 13-17 years: the READY feasibility RCT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1