Rapid triage and transfer system for patients with proven Covid-19 at emergency department.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Journal of applied biomedicine Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-13 DOI:10.32725/jab.2024.006
Martin Jakl, Jana Berkova, Tomas Veleta, Vladimir Palicka, Petra Polcarova, Jan Smetana, Petr Grenar, Martina Cermakova, Jan Vanek, Jan M Horacek, Jaromir Koci
{"title":"Rapid triage and transfer system for patients with proven Covid-19 at emergency department.","authors":"Martin Jakl, Jana Berkova, Tomas Veleta, Vladimir Palicka, Petra Polcarova, Jan Smetana, Petr Grenar, Martina Cermakova, Jan Vanek, Jan M Horacek, Jaromir Koci","doi":"10.32725/jab.2024.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COVID-19 is a viral disease notorious for frequent worldwide outbreaks. It is difficult to control, thereby resulting in overload of the healthcare system. A possible solution to prevent overcrowding is rapid triage of patients, which makes it possible to focus care on the high-risk patients and minimize the impact of crowding on patient prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The triage algorithm assessed self-sufficiency, oximetry, systolic blood pressure, and the Glasgow coma scale. Compliance with the triage protocol was defined as fulfillment of all protocol steps, including assignment of the correct level of care. Triage was considered successful if there was no change in the scope of care (e.g., unscheduled hospital admission, transfer to different level of care) or if there was unexpected death within 48 hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 929 patients were enrolled in the study. Triage criteria were fulfilled in 825 (88.8%) patients. Within 48 hours, unscheduled hospital admission, transfer to different level of care, or unexpected death occurred in 56 (6.0%), 6 (0.6%), and 5 (0.5%) patients, respectively. The risk of unscheduled hospital admission or transfer to different level of care was significantly increased if triage criteria were not fulfilled [13.1% vs. 76.1%, RR 5.8 (3.8-8.3), p < 0.001; 0.5% vs. 5.2%, RR 11.4 (2.3-57.7), p = 0.036, respectively].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed algorithm for triage of patients with proven COVID-19 is a simple, fast, and reliable tool for rapid sorting for outpatient treatment, hospitalization on a standard ward, or assignment to an intensive care unit.</p>","PeriodicalId":14912,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied biomedicine","volume":"22 1","pages":"59-65"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32725/jab.2024.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 is a viral disease notorious for frequent worldwide outbreaks. It is difficult to control, thereby resulting in overload of the healthcare system. A possible solution to prevent overcrowding is rapid triage of patients, which makes it possible to focus care on the high-risk patients and minimize the impact of crowding on patient prognosis.

Methods: The triage algorithm assessed self-sufficiency, oximetry, systolic blood pressure, and the Glasgow coma scale. Compliance with the triage protocol was defined as fulfillment of all protocol steps, including assignment of the correct level of care. Triage was considered successful if there was no change in the scope of care (e.g., unscheduled hospital admission, transfer to different level of care) or if there was unexpected death within 48 hours.

Results: A total of 929 patients were enrolled in the study. Triage criteria were fulfilled in 825 (88.8%) patients. Within 48 hours, unscheduled hospital admission, transfer to different level of care, or unexpected death occurred in 56 (6.0%), 6 (0.6%), and 5 (0.5%) patients, respectively. The risk of unscheduled hospital admission or transfer to different level of care was significantly increased if triage criteria were not fulfilled [13.1% vs. 76.1%, RR 5.8 (3.8-8.3), p < 0.001; 0.5% vs. 5.2%, RR 11.4 (2.3-57.7), p = 0.036, respectively].

Conclusion: The proposed algorithm for triage of patients with proven COVID-19 is a simple, fast, and reliable tool for rapid sorting for outpatient treatment, hospitalization on a standard ward, or assignment to an intensive care unit.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科经证实患有 Covid-19 的病人的快速分流和转院系统。
背景:COVID-19 是一种病毒性疾病,在全球频繁爆发,臭名昭著。这种疾病难以控制,从而导致医疗系统不堪重负。防止过度拥挤的一个可行解决方案是对病人进行快速分流,这样就能集中护理高危病人,并将拥挤对病人预后的影响降至最低:分诊算法评估了患者的自理能力、血氧饱和度、收缩压和格拉斯哥昏迷量表。遵守分诊规程的定义是完成所有规程步骤,包括分配正确的护理级别。如果护理范围没有发生变化(如计划外入院、转入不同护理级别)或在 48 小时内出现意外死亡,则认为分流成功:共有 929 名患者参与了研究。符合分诊标准的患者有 825 人(88.8%)。在 48 小时内,分别有 56 名(6.0%)、6 名(0.6%)和 5 名(0.5%)患者发生非计划入院、转院或意外死亡。如果不符合分诊标准,非计划入院或转入不同级别护理的风险会显著增加[分别为13.1% vs. 76.1%,RR 5.8 (3.8-8.3),p < 0.001;0.5% vs. 5.2%,RR 11.4 (2.3-57.7),p = 0.036]:建议的 COVID-19 患者分流算法是一种简单、快速、可靠的工具,可快速分流至门诊治疗、标准病房住院或重症监护室。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of applied biomedicine
Journal of applied biomedicine PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
13
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Biomedicine promotes translation of basic biomedical research into clinical investigation, conversion of clinical evidence into practice in all medical fields, and publication of new ideas for conquering human health problems across disciplines. Providing a unique perspective, this international journal publishes peer-reviewed original papers and reviews offering a sensible transfer of basic research to applied clinical medicine. Journal of Applied Biomedicine covers the latest developments in various fields of biomedicine with special attention to cardiology and cardiovascular diseases, genetics, immunology, environmental health, toxicology, neurology and oncology as well as multidisciplinary studies. The views of experts on current advances in nanotechnology and molecular/cell biology will be also considered for publication as long as they have a direct clinical impact on human health. The journal does not accept basic science research or research without significant clinical implications. Manuscripts with innovative ideas and approaches that bridge different fields and show clear perspectives for clinical applications are considered with top priority.
期刊最新文献
Anti-NMDAR1 antibody impairs dendritic branching in immature cultured neurons. Astragaloside IV confronts amyloid-beta-induced astrocyte senescence via hsp90aa1. In vitro biological activities of Calamintha nepeta L. aqueous extracts. Olfactory event-related potentials (OERPs) and trigeminal event-related potentials (TERPs) in subjects after Covid-19 infection: single-center prospective study. Salivary glands - a new site of Helicobacter pylori occurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1