Association between amiodarone use and risk of cataract: a population-based active-comparator study.

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Postgraduate Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1093/postmj/qgae034
Sheng-Yin To, Hsin-Ting Lin, Chun-Cheng Liao, Ke-Ting Pan, Yuan-Liang Wen, Senyeong Kao, Li-Ting Kao
{"title":"Association between amiodarone use and risk of cataract: a population-based active-comparator study.","authors":"Sheng-Yin To, Hsin-Ting Lin, Chun-Cheng Liao, Ke-Ting Pan, Yuan-Liang Wen, Senyeong Kao, Li-Ting Kao","doi":"10.1093/postmj/qgae034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite previous concerns about ocular side effects related to amiodarone, the relationship between amiodarone and cataract remains uncertain. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the potential association between amiodarone use and the subsequent risk of cataract, taking into account potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This population-based, active comparator-controlled cohort study utilized the data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance program and involved adults over 40 years old between 2001 and 2013. We analyzed 12 055 new amiodarone users and contrasted them with a propafenone user cohort. The primary outcome was the incidence of cataract. Inverse-probability treatment-weighting (IPTW) was further used to eliminate the potential confounding effects, and Cox proportional-hazard regression analyses were performed to calculate the risk of cataract. Serial subgroup analyses were also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the main analysis, amiodarone users did not exhibit a significant causal relationship in both full cohort [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.994, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.913-1.082] and IPTW cohort (IPTW-aHR 0.977, 95% CI: 0.900-1.060). Furthermore, it is important to highlight a significantly reduced risk of cataract among patients with heart failure (IPTW-aHR 0.708, 95% CI: 0.554-0.905) and during the 2-year follow-up period (IPTW-aHR 0.889, 95% CI: 0.794-0.996), implying potential advantages linked to the use of amiodarone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study found no increased risk of cataract with amiodarone, one of the most frequently used antiarrhythmic medications, compared to the use of propafenone. Future research is recommended to explore potential mechanisms and their implications for clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":20374,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgae034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite previous concerns about ocular side effects related to amiodarone, the relationship between amiodarone and cataract remains uncertain. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the potential association between amiodarone use and the subsequent risk of cataract, taking into account potential confounders.

Methods: This population-based, active comparator-controlled cohort study utilized the data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance program and involved adults over 40 years old between 2001 and 2013. We analyzed 12 055 new amiodarone users and contrasted them with a propafenone user cohort. The primary outcome was the incidence of cataract. Inverse-probability treatment-weighting (IPTW) was further used to eliminate the potential confounding effects, and Cox proportional-hazard regression analyses were performed to calculate the risk of cataract. Serial subgroup analyses were also performed.

Results: In the main analysis, amiodarone users did not exhibit a significant causal relationship in both full cohort [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.994, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.913-1.082] and IPTW cohort (IPTW-aHR 0.977, 95% CI: 0.900-1.060). Furthermore, it is important to highlight a significantly reduced risk of cataract among patients with heart failure (IPTW-aHR 0.708, 95% CI: 0.554-0.905) and during the 2-year follow-up period (IPTW-aHR 0.889, 95% CI: 0.794-0.996), implying potential advantages linked to the use of amiodarone.

Conclusions: The study found no increased risk of cataract with amiodarone, one of the most frequently used antiarrhythmic medications, compared to the use of propafenone. Future research is recommended to explore potential mechanisms and their implications for clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用胺碘酮与白内障风险之间的关系:一项基于人群的主动比较研究。
背景:尽管以前人们曾担心胺碘酮会对眼睛产生副作用,但胺碘酮与白内障之间的关系仍不确定。因此,本研究旨在评估胺碘酮的使用与后续白内障风险之间的潜在关联,同时考虑潜在的混杂因素:这项基于人群的主动比较对照队列研究利用了台湾国民健康保险计划的数据,涉及 2001 年至 2013 年期间 40 岁以上的成年人。我们分析了 12 055 名新的胺碘酮使用者,并与普罗帕酮使用者队列进行了对比。主要结果是白内障的发病率。为了消除潜在的混杂效应,我们进一步采用了反概率治疗加权法(IPTW),并进行了考克斯比例危险回归分析,以计算白内障的风险。此外还进行了序列亚组分析:在主要分析中,胺碘酮使用者在全队列[调整后危险比(aHR):0.994,95% 置信区间(CI):0.913-1.082]和 IPTW 队列(IPTW-aHR 0.977,95% CI:0.900-1.060)中均未表现出显著的因果关系。此外,需要强调的是,心力衰竭患者(IPTW-aHR 0.708,95% CI:0.554-0.905)和2年随访期间(IPTW-aHR 0.889,95% CI:0.794-0.996)患白内障的风险显著降低,这意味着使用胺碘酮具有潜在的优势:研究发现,与使用普罗帕酮相比,使用胺碘酮这种最常用的抗心律失常药物不会增加患白内障的风险。建议今后开展研究,探讨其潜在机制及其对临床实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Postgraduate Medical Journal
Postgraduate Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Postgraduate Medical Journal is a peer reviewed journal published on behalf of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. The journal aims to support junior doctors and their teachers and contribute to the continuing professional development of all doctors by publishing papers on a wide range of topics relevant to the practicing clinician and teacher. Papers published in PMJ include those that focus on core competencies; that describe current practice and new developments in all branches of medicine; that describe relevance and impact of translational research on clinical practice; that provide background relevant to examinations; and papers on medical education and medical education research. PMJ supports CPD by providing the opportunity for doctors to publish many types of articles including original clinical research; reviews; quality improvement reports; editorials, and correspondence on clinical matters.
期刊最新文献
A Mendelian analysis of the causality between inflammatory cytokines and digestive tract cancers. Cholecystectomy and cancer risk: evidence from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and Mendelian randomization. The key to addressing the issue of academic misconduct in the medical field is to reform the evaluation system. Timeliness of reperfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and outcomes in Kerala, India: results of the TRUST outcomes registry. Variation of brain natriuretic peptide assists with volume management and predicts prognosis of hemodialysis patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1