Almond hulls and shells as an alternative fiber source in limit-fed growing beef cattle diets.

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Translational Animal Science Pub Date : 2024-02-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/tas/txae025
Zachary M Duncan, Zachary L DeBord, Madison G Pflughoeft, Kyler J Suhr, William R Hollenbeck, Frank K Brazle, Haley K Wecker, Chad B Paulk, Evan C Titgemeyer, K C Olson, Dale A Blasi
{"title":"Almond hulls and shells as an alternative fiber source in limit-fed growing beef cattle diets.","authors":"Zachary M Duncan, Zachary L DeBord, Madison G Pflughoeft, Kyler J Suhr, William R Hollenbeck, Frank K Brazle, Haley K Wecker, Chad B Paulk, Evan C Titgemeyer, K C Olson, Dale A Blasi","doi":"10.1093/tas/txae025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Almond hulls and shells are a by-product of almond production that can be incorporated as a feed ingredient in beef cattle diets. Three experiments were conducted to determine the effects of hammermill screen size on almond hull and shell bulk density and inclusion of ground or non-ground almond hulls and shells in limit-fed growing diets on growth performance, diet digestibility, and ruminal fermentation characteristics of beef cattle. In experiment 1, almond hulls and shells were ground with a laboratory-scale hammermill using no screen, a 11.1-mm screen, a 19.1-mm screen, or a 25.4-mm screen. Each screen-size treatment was ground at three separate time points (<i>n</i>= 3 replications/treatment). Grinding almond hulls and shells with no screen increased bulk density by 111% and minimized proportions of fine particles; therefore, almond hulls and shells ground using no screen were included as a treatment in the following experiments. In experiment 2, 364 steers (initial body weight [BW]: 257± 20.7 kg) were blocked by truckload (<i>n</i> = 4), stratified by BW, and assigned to pen within block. Pens were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 experimental diets (<i>n</i>= 10 pens/treatment). The control diet (CON) contained (DM basis) 39.5% dry-rolled corn, 7.5% supplement, 40% wet-corn gluten feed, and 13% prairie hay. Non-ground (13AH) or ground (13GAH) almond hulls and shells replaced prairie hay and were fed at 13% of diet DM or non-ground almond hulls and shells were fed at 26% of diet DM and replaced 13% prairie hay and 13% dry-rolled corn (26AH). Diets were limit-fed at 2.2% of BW daily (DM basis) for 56 d. Overall average daily gains (ADG) were greater (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05) for CON, 13AH, and 13GAH compared with 26AH. In addition, ADG from days 14 to 56 were greater (<i>P</i>= 0.03) for 13GAH and tended to be greater (<i>P</i> = 0.09) for 13AH compared with CON. Experiment 3 was a 4 × 4 replicated Latin square in which 8 ruminally cannulated heifers (initial BW = 378 ± 44.0 kg) were fed diets from experiment 2. Apparent dry matter digestibility did not differ (<i>P</i> = 0.21) among treatments. Total ruminal volatile fatty acid concentrations were greater (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.03) for 13GAH and 13AH compared with 26AH and tended (<i>P</i> = 0.06) to be greater for 13GAH compared with CON. Overall, almond hulls and shells can be utilized as an alternative to prairie hay in limit-fed growing diets without negatively influencing rates of gain or diet digestibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10949434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Almond hulls and shells are a by-product of almond production that can be incorporated as a feed ingredient in beef cattle diets. Three experiments were conducted to determine the effects of hammermill screen size on almond hull and shell bulk density and inclusion of ground or non-ground almond hulls and shells in limit-fed growing diets on growth performance, diet digestibility, and ruminal fermentation characteristics of beef cattle. In experiment 1, almond hulls and shells were ground with a laboratory-scale hammermill using no screen, a 11.1-mm screen, a 19.1-mm screen, or a 25.4-mm screen. Each screen-size treatment was ground at three separate time points (n= 3 replications/treatment). Grinding almond hulls and shells with no screen increased bulk density by 111% and minimized proportions of fine particles; therefore, almond hulls and shells ground using no screen were included as a treatment in the following experiments. In experiment 2, 364 steers (initial body weight [BW]: 257± 20.7 kg) were blocked by truckload (n = 4), stratified by BW, and assigned to pen within block. Pens were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 experimental diets (n= 10 pens/treatment). The control diet (CON) contained (DM basis) 39.5% dry-rolled corn, 7.5% supplement, 40% wet-corn gluten feed, and 13% prairie hay. Non-ground (13AH) or ground (13GAH) almond hulls and shells replaced prairie hay and were fed at 13% of diet DM or non-ground almond hulls and shells were fed at 26% of diet DM and replaced 13% prairie hay and 13% dry-rolled corn (26AH). Diets were limit-fed at 2.2% of BW daily (DM basis) for 56 d. Overall average daily gains (ADG) were greater (P ≤ 0.05) for CON, 13AH, and 13GAH compared with 26AH. In addition, ADG from days 14 to 56 were greater (P= 0.03) for 13GAH and tended to be greater (P = 0.09) for 13AH compared with CON. Experiment 3 was a 4 × 4 replicated Latin square in which 8 ruminally cannulated heifers (initial BW = 378 ± 44.0 kg) were fed diets from experiment 2. Apparent dry matter digestibility did not differ (P = 0.21) among treatments. Total ruminal volatile fatty acid concentrations were greater (P ≤ 0.03) for 13GAH and 13AH compared with 26AH and tended (P = 0.06) to be greater for 13GAH compared with CON. Overall, almond hulls and shells can be utilized as an alternative to prairie hay in limit-fed growing diets without negatively influencing rates of gain or diet digestibility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在限饲生长肉牛日粮中作为替代纤维来源的杏仁壳。
杏仁壳是杏仁生产过程中产生的一种副产品,可作为饲料原料添加到肉牛日粮中。我们进行了三项实验,以确定碾碎机筛网尺寸对杏仁壳和杏仁壳容重的影响,以及在限饲生长日粮中添加磨碎或未磨碎的杏仁壳和杏仁壳对肉牛生长性能、日粮消化率和瘤胃发酵特性的影响。在实验 1 中,使用实验室规模的锤式粉碎机粉碎杏仁壳和贝壳,不使用筛网、11.1 毫米筛网、19.1 毫米筛网或 25.4 毫米筛网。每种筛网尺寸的处理都在三个不同的时间点进行研磨(n= 3 个重复/处理)。不使用筛网研磨杏仁壳和贝壳可使容重增加 111%,并最大限度地减少细颗粒的比例;因此,不使用筛网研磨的杏仁壳和贝壳被作为一种处理方法纳入以下实验中。在实验 2 中,364 头母牛(初始体重 [BW]:257± 20.7 千克)按卡车装载量(n = 4)分块,按体重分层,并分配到块内的畜栏。笔随机分配到 4 种实验日粮中的一种(n= 10 笔/处理)。对照日粮(CON)含有(DM 基础)39.5% 的干轧玉米、7.5% 的补充料、40% 的湿玉米麸质饲料和 13% 的草原干草。非磨碎的(13AH)或磨碎的(13GAH)杏仁壳和贝壳取代了草原干草,其饲喂量占日粮 DM 的 13%,或非磨碎的杏仁壳和贝壳的饲喂量占日粮 DM 的 26%,取代了 13% 的草原干草和 13% 的干轧玉米(26AH)。与 26AH 相比,CON、13AH 和 13GAH 的总体平均日增重(ADG)更高(P ≤ 0.05)。此外,与 CON 相比,13GAH 在第 14 天至第 56 天的平均日增重更大(P= 0.03),13AH 的平均日增重往往更大(P= 0.09)。实验 3 采用 4 × 4 重复拉丁方形,8 头反刍插管母牛(初始体重 = 378 ± 44.0 千克)饲喂实验 2 的日粮。各处理的表观干物质消化率没有差异(P = 0.21)。与 26AH 相比,13GAH 和 13AH 的瘤胃总挥发性脂肪酸浓度更高(P ≤ 0.03),与 CON 相比,13GAH 有更高的趋势(P = 0.06)。总之,在限饲生长日粮中,杏仁壳和杏仁壳可用作草原干草的替代品,而不会对增重率或日粮消化率产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of formaldehyde when complete feed and soybean meal were inoculated with porcine epidemic diarrhea virus, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, and Seneca Valley virus 1. Effect of balanced vs. standard protein on muscle mass development in exercising horses. Mealworm larvae and black soldier fly larvae as novel protein supplements for cattle consuming low-quality forage. Determination of gas flux of growing steers under intensive grazing conditions. Growth performance and meat quality of broiler chickens fed diet containing bird eye pepper of varying proportion and sieve size.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1