Cardiorespiratory Effects of Yogic Versus Slow Breathing in Individuals with a Spinal Cord Injury: An Exploratory Cohort Study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1089/jicm.2023.0641
Marc D Mazur, Jason W Hamner, Amit N Anand, J Andrew Taylor
{"title":"Cardiorespiratory Effects of Yogic Versus Slow Breathing in Individuals with a Spinal Cord Injury: An Exploratory Cohort Study.","authors":"Marc D Mazur, Jason W Hamner, Amit N Anand, J Andrew Taylor","doi":"10.1089/jicm.2023.0641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> An intricate physiological and pathophysiological connection exists between the heart and lungs, which is especially important in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). While an exercise intervention may seem the best approach to leverage this relationship, the prior work has shown that, despite numerous health benefits, regular exercise training does not improve cardiorespiratory control in individuals with SCI. Breath training presents an alternative intervention that is uniquely accessible, with yogic breathing directly engaging linked fluctuations in respiration and cardiovascular control. In addition, there is evidence across a range of populations that regular yogic breathing reduces cardiovascular disease risk. It is possible that the chronic decrease in breathing frequency associated with regular yogic breathing, rather than the specific yogic breathing techniques themselves, is the primary contributor to the observed risk reduction. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Therefore, in 12 individuals with traumatic SCI from C4 to T8, the authors compared Unpaced and conventional 0.083 Hz (Slow) paced breathing with various yogic breathing techniques including: (1) inspiratory-expiratory breath holds (i.e., Kumbhaka or \"Box Breathing\"), (2) extended exhalation (1:2 duty cycle), and (3) expiratory resistance via throat constriction (i.e., Ujjayi). Beat-to-beat heart rate and blood pressure were measured as well as end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>2</sub> saturation were measured. Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance with <i>post hoc</i> pairwise <i>t</i> tests corrected for multiple comparisons. <b><i>Results:</i></b> As expected, all slow breathing patterns markedly increased respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) compared with Unpaced in all (<i>n</i> = 12) individuals. More importantly, Ujjayi breathing appeared to improve ventilatory efficiency over Unpaced breathing in individuals with SCI by increasing O<sub>2</sub> saturation (97.6% vs. 96.1%; <i>p</i> = 0.042) and tended to decrease end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> (32 mmHg vs. 35 mmHg; <i>p</i> = 0.08). While other slow breathing patterns demonstrated similar effects, only Ujjayi improved RSA while increasing heart rate and improving ventilatory efficiency. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Hence, slow breathing <i>per se</i> can result in important cardiorespiratory changes, but the yogic breathing practice of Ujjayi, with glottic throat resistance, may hold the greatest promise for improving cardiorespiratory control in individuals with SCI (CTR ID No. NCT05480618).</p>","PeriodicalId":29734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"878-885"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jicm.2023.0641","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An intricate physiological and pathophysiological connection exists between the heart and lungs, which is especially important in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). While an exercise intervention may seem the best approach to leverage this relationship, the prior work has shown that, despite numerous health benefits, regular exercise training does not improve cardiorespiratory control in individuals with SCI. Breath training presents an alternative intervention that is uniquely accessible, with yogic breathing directly engaging linked fluctuations in respiration and cardiovascular control. In addition, there is evidence across a range of populations that regular yogic breathing reduces cardiovascular disease risk. It is possible that the chronic decrease in breathing frequency associated with regular yogic breathing, rather than the specific yogic breathing techniques themselves, is the primary contributor to the observed risk reduction. Methods: Therefore, in 12 individuals with traumatic SCI from C4 to T8, the authors compared Unpaced and conventional 0.083 Hz (Slow) paced breathing with various yogic breathing techniques including: (1) inspiratory-expiratory breath holds (i.e., Kumbhaka or "Box Breathing"), (2) extended exhalation (1:2 duty cycle), and (3) expiratory resistance via throat constriction (i.e., Ujjayi). Beat-to-beat heart rate and blood pressure were measured as well as end-tidal CO2 and O2 saturation were measured. Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance with post hoc pairwise t tests corrected for multiple comparisons. Results: As expected, all slow breathing patterns markedly increased respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) compared with Unpaced in all (n = 12) individuals. More importantly, Ujjayi breathing appeared to improve ventilatory efficiency over Unpaced breathing in individuals with SCI by increasing O2 saturation (97.6% vs. 96.1%; p = 0.042) and tended to decrease end-tidal CO2 (32 mmHg vs. 35 mmHg; p = 0.08). While other slow breathing patterns demonstrated similar effects, only Ujjayi improved RSA while increasing heart rate and improving ventilatory efficiency. Conclusions: Hence, slow breathing per se can result in important cardiorespiratory changes, but the yogic breathing practice of Ujjayi, with glottic throat resistance, may hold the greatest promise for improving cardiorespiratory control in individuals with SCI (CTR ID No. NCT05480618).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑜伽与慢速呼吸对脊髓损伤者心肺功能的影响:一项探索性队列研究
背景:心肺之间存在着错综复杂的生理和病理生理学联系,这对脊髓损伤(SCI)患者尤为重要。虽然运动干预似乎是利用这种关系的最佳方法,但先前的研究表明,尽管对健康有诸多益处,但定期运动训练并不能改善 SCI 患者的心肺控制。呼吸训练提供了另一种独特的干预方法,瑜伽呼吸直接参与呼吸和心血管控制的波动。此外,有证据表明,在一系列人群中,定期进行瑜伽呼吸可降低心血管疾病风险。与定期瑜伽呼吸相关的呼吸频率的长期降低,而不是特定的瑜伽呼吸技巧本身,可能是观察到的风险降低的主要原因。研究方法因此,作者在 12 名从 C4 到 T8 的创伤性 SCI 患者中,比较了无节奏和传统的 0.083 Hz(慢)节奏呼吸与各种瑜伽呼吸技巧,包括:(1)吸气-呼气屏气(即 Kumbhaka 或 "盒式呼吸");(2)延长呼气(1:2 工作周期);(3)通过喉咙收缩进行呼气阻力(即 Ujjayi)。对心跳率和血压以及潮气末二氧化碳和氧气饱和度进行了测量。统计分析采用单向重复测量方差分析,并对多重比较进行事后配对 t 检验校正。结果不出所料,与无节奏相比,所有(n = 12)人的所有慢速呼吸模式都明显增加了呼吸窦性心律失常(RSA)。更重要的是,与无节律呼吸相比,Ujjayi 呼吸似乎提高了 SCI 患者的通气效率,增加了氧气饱和度(97.6% 对 96.1%;p = 0.042),并倾向于降低潮气末二氧化碳(32 mmHg 对 35 mmHg;p = 0.08)。虽然其他慢速呼吸模式也有类似效果,但只有 Ujjayi 能在提高心率和通气效率的同时改善 RSA。结论:因此,慢速呼吸本身可导致重要的心肺变化,但具有喉头阻力的 Ujjayi 瑜伽呼吸练习可能最有希望改善 SCI 患者的心肺控制(CTR ID 编号:NCT05480618)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biofield Therapies Clinical Research Landscape: A Scoping Review and Interactive Evidence Map. Research in Integrative and Complementary Medicine: Particularities, Challenges, Obstacles, and Misunderstandings. Part 2: Things Can also Work Differently when the Context is Different. Integration of Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicine in the Institutionalization of Evidence-Informed Decision-Making: The World Health Organization Meeting Report. Instruments for Evaluating Undergraduate Medical Education in Complementary and Integrative Medicine: A Systematic Review. Australian Naturopaths Approach to the Clinical Management of Patients Presenting with Sleep Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1