Physiological and perceptual responses to temperature step changes between cold and hot environments.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ERGONOMICS International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1080/10803548.2024.2326351
Qianqian Huang, Jian Li, Jun Li
{"title":"Physiological and perceptual responses to temperature step changes between cold and hot environments.","authors":"Qianqian Huang, Jian Li, Jun Li","doi":"10.1080/10803548.2024.2326351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives.</i> This study explores the effects of temperature steps on thermal responses to understand abrupt temperature shifts faced by heat-exposed workers during winter. <i>Methods.</i> Three temperature step changes with three phases (S20: 20-40-20 °C, S30: 10-40-10 °C, S40: 0-40-0 °C) were conducted. Phase 1 took 30 min, phase 2 took 60 min and phase 3 took 40 min. Eleven participants remained sedentary throughout the experiment, and physiological responses, thermal perception and self-reported health symptoms were recorded. <i>Results.</i> In temperature up steps, steady skin temperature and sweating onset were delayed, and heart rate dropped by 10 bpm from S20 to S40. In temperature down steps to cold conditions, individuals transitioned from thermal comfort to discomfort and eventually cold strain. Blood pressure increased in temperature down steps, correlating with temperature step magnitudes. Thermal responses to temperature steps of equal magnitude but opposite directions were asymmetries, which weakened as step magnitude increased. Thermal perceptions responded faster than physiological changes after temperature steps, while self-reported health symptoms lagged behind physiological responses. <i>Conclusions.</i> These findings contribute to expanding basic data to understand the effects of temperature step magnitude and direction.</p>","PeriodicalId":47704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"587-598"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2024.2326351","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. This study explores the effects of temperature steps on thermal responses to understand abrupt temperature shifts faced by heat-exposed workers during winter. Methods. Three temperature step changes with three phases (S20: 20-40-20 °C, S30: 10-40-10 °C, S40: 0-40-0 °C) were conducted. Phase 1 took 30 min, phase 2 took 60 min and phase 3 took 40 min. Eleven participants remained sedentary throughout the experiment, and physiological responses, thermal perception and self-reported health symptoms were recorded. Results. In temperature up steps, steady skin temperature and sweating onset were delayed, and heart rate dropped by 10 bpm from S20 to S40. In temperature down steps to cold conditions, individuals transitioned from thermal comfort to discomfort and eventually cold strain. Blood pressure increased in temperature down steps, correlating with temperature step magnitudes. Thermal responses to temperature steps of equal magnitude but opposite directions were asymmetries, which weakened as step magnitude increased. Thermal perceptions responded faster than physiological changes after temperature steps, while self-reported health symptoms lagged behind physiological responses. Conclusions. These findings contribute to expanding basic data to understand the effects of temperature step magnitude and direction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对冷热环境温度阶跃变化的生理和知觉反应。
研究目的本研究探讨了温度阶梯对热反应的影响,以了解受热工人在冬季面临的温度骤变。方法。进行了三个阶段的温度阶跃变化(S20:20-40-20 °C;S30:10-40-10 °C;S40:0-40-0 °C)。第一阶段耗时 30 分钟,第二阶段耗时 60 分钟,第三阶段耗时 40 分钟。11 名参与者在整个实验过程中保持静坐,并记录了生理反应、热感和自我报告的健康症状。实验结果在温度上升阶段,稳定的皮肤温度和出汗开始时间推迟,心率从 S20 到 S40 下降了 10 bpm。在温度下降到寒冷条件时,人从热舒适过渡到不舒适,最终出现寒冷疲劳。在降温过程中,血压升高,这与降温幅度有关。对幅度相同但方向相反的温度阶跃的热反应是不对称的,随着阶跃幅度的增加而减弱。温度阶跃后,热感觉的反应快于生理变化,而自我报告的健康症状则落后于生理反应。结论。这些发现有助于扩大基础数据,以了解温度阶跃幅度和方向的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
152
期刊最新文献
Exercises to improve directional sound recognition by visually impaired users heading to the workplace. The impact of safety leadership on safety behaviors of aircraft rescue and firefighting personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic. Determining the effect levels of augmented decent work criteria in sustainable economic development with the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Evaluation of success factors of occupational health and safety management systems with the analytical hierarchy process: the case of ground handling companies in Turkey. Using benevolent leadership to improve safety behaviour in the construction industry: a moderated mediation model of safety knowledge and safety training and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1