Patient and caregiver satisfaction of a palliative care chronic diseases clinic during COVID lockdowns.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Chronic Illness Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1177/17423953241241757
Xiang Rong Sim, Jade Hudson, Catriona Parker, Fiona Runacres, Peter Poon
{"title":"Patient and caregiver satisfaction of a palliative care chronic diseases clinic during COVID lockdowns.","authors":"Xiang Rong Sim, Jade Hudson, Catriona Parker, Fiona Runacres, Peter Poon","doi":"10.1177/17423953241241757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the quality assurance of a specialist palliative care clinic focused on chronic diseases and explore the satisfaction and acceptability of the telemedicine model amongst patients and caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional 23-item survey was developed by the clinical team, approved by ethics and distributed to patients and caregivers. Data collection ran between September 2021 and February 2022, and SPSS was used for data analysis. Demographics were collected from hospital records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five surveys were returned. The cohort had a median age of 82 years, and the most common primary diagnosis was renal failure. Participants rated telemedicine as easier to access than face-to-face appointments due to convenience. Telemedicine was rated highly for future utility, with video consultations being perceived as more useful than telephone consultations. Participants responded overwhelmingly well towards the clinic.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings demonstrated high levels of satisfaction with the Supportive Care Clinic model and for telemedicine. However, logistical challenges and the desire for face-to-face appointments were also identified. The study highlights the importance of offering a range of modalities for patient engagement in healthcare services and suggests that telemedicine should complement, rather than replace, face-to-face consultations. Future investigations should explore patient and caregiver sentiment towards telemedicine platforms alongside patient deterioration.</p>","PeriodicalId":48530,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Illness","volume":" ","pages":"545-548"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Illness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17423953241241757","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the quality assurance of a specialist palliative care clinic focused on chronic diseases and explore the satisfaction and acceptability of the telemedicine model amongst patients and caregivers.

Methods: A cross-sectional 23-item survey was developed by the clinical team, approved by ethics and distributed to patients and caregivers. Data collection ran between September 2021 and February 2022, and SPSS was used for data analysis. Demographics were collected from hospital records.

Results: Thirty-five surveys were returned. The cohort had a median age of 82 years, and the most common primary diagnosis was renal failure. Participants rated telemedicine as easier to access than face-to-face appointments due to convenience. Telemedicine was rated highly for future utility, with video consultations being perceived as more useful than telephone consultations. Participants responded overwhelmingly well towards the clinic.

Discussion: Findings demonstrated high levels of satisfaction with the Supportive Care Clinic model and for telemedicine. However, logistical challenges and the desire for face-to-face appointments were also identified. The study highlights the importance of offering a range of modalities for patient engagement in healthcare services and suggests that telemedicine should complement, rather than replace, face-to-face consultations. Future investigations should explore patient and caregiver sentiment towards telemedicine platforms alongside patient deterioration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 COVID 封锁期间,病人和护理人员对姑息关怀慢性病诊所的满意度。
目的评估专注于慢性病的姑息关怀专科门诊的质量保证,探讨远程医疗模式在患者和护理人员中的满意度和可接受性:方法: 临床团队制定了一项 23 个项目的横向调查,经伦理委员会批准后分发给患者和护理人员。数据收集时间为 2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 2 月,采用 SPSS 进行数据分析。人口统计数据来自医院记录:共收回 35 份调查问卷。调查对象的中位年龄为 82 岁,最常见的主要诊断为肾衰竭。参与者认为远程医疗比面对面预约更方便。他们对远程医疗的未来实用性评价很高,认为视频会诊比电话会诊更有用。参与者对诊所的反应非常好:讨论:研究结果表明,支持性医疗诊所模式和远程医疗的满意度很高。然而,也发现了后勤方面的挑战和面对面预约的愿望。这项研究强调了为患者参与医疗服务提供一系列模式的重要性,并建议远程医疗应作为面对面咨询的补充,而不是取而代之。未来的调查应探讨患者和护理人员对远程医疗平台的看法以及患者病情恶化的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chronic Illness
Chronic Illness Multiple-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Chronic illnesses are prolonged, do not resolve spontaneously, and are rarely completely cured. The most common are cardiovascular diseases (hypertension, coronary artery disease, stroke and heart failure), the arthritides, asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes and epilepsy. There is increasing evidence that mental illnesses such as depression are best understood as chronic health problems. HIV/AIDS has become a chronic condition in those countries where effective medication is available.
期刊最新文献
Beyond the battle: A cross-sectional study on cancer-related fatigue and predictors of quality of life in female adolescent and young adult survivors. Social support within couples coping with Parkinson's disease. Experiences of students with chronic illness in university education in Ireland. Experiences and expectations of physician communication: A focus group discussion with Indian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. How close are children with obesity to becoming an adult with chronic illnesses?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1