Development and Validation of Information Technology Scale in Nursing.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1782229
Elif Sarac, Esra Yildiz
{"title":"Development and Validation of Information Technology Scale in Nursing.","authors":"Elif Sarac, Esra Yildiz","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1782229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The implementation of information technology (IT) in patient care is on the rise. The nursing workforce should be prepared for using such technology to support the delivery of patient-centered care. The integration of informatics into nursing practice has been progressing at a slower rate than the development of advancements and in which areas nurses use IT is still not clear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong> Our objective was to develop a new instrument to determine the usage of IT in nursing practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A methodological study was conducted with factor analyses. A total of 498 registered nurses in a university hospital (<i>n</i> = 374) and primary care centers (<i>n</i> = 124) participated in the study. A questionnaire consisting demographic characteristics and an item pool with 50 statements were used to collect data. The validity and reliability of the instrument were statistically tested by computing the Keiser-Meier-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett tests, an exploratory factor analysis, descriptive statistics, Cronbach's α, and a confirmatory factor analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The instrument extracted eight factors comprising 39 items that explained 55% of the variance: professional autonomy(α = 0.82), data sharing/communication(α = 0.80), data management (α = 0.79), professional development (α = 0.71), administration (α = 0.76), research (α = 0.76), informing (α = 0.68), and classification of interventions (α = 0.75). Total reliability was 0.936. KMO index and a measure of sampling adequacy were high (0.936); the Bartlett test of sphericity was significant (<i>p</i> < 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Study provided the evidence for the factor structure, internal consistency, reliability, and responsiveness of the 39-item \"The Information Technology Scale in Nursing.\" Further testing of the developed instrument with a larger number of nurses from various backgrounds and different settings is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10954377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1782229","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  The implementation of information technology (IT) in patient care is on the rise. The nursing workforce should be prepared for using such technology to support the delivery of patient-centered care. The integration of informatics into nursing practice has been progressing at a slower rate than the development of advancements and in which areas nurses use IT is still not clear.

Objective:  Our objective was to develop a new instrument to determine the usage of IT in nursing practice.

Methods:  A methodological study was conducted with factor analyses. A total of 498 registered nurses in a university hospital (n = 374) and primary care centers (n = 124) participated in the study. A questionnaire consisting demographic characteristics and an item pool with 50 statements were used to collect data. The validity and reliability of the instrument were statistically tested by computing the Keiser-Meier-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett tests, an exploratory factor analysis, descriptive statistics, Cronbach's α, and a confirmatory factor analysis.

Results:  The instrument extracted eight factors comprising 39 items that explained 55% of the variance: professional autonomy(α = 0.82), data sharing/communication(α = 0.80), data management (α = 0.79), professional development (α = 0.71), administration (α = 0.76), research (α = 0.76), informing (α = 0.68), and classification of interventions (α = 0.75). Total reliability was 0.936. KMO index and a measure of sampling adequacy were high (0.936); the Bartlett test of sphericity was significant (p < 0.005).

Conclusion:  Study provided the evidence for the factor structure, internal consistency, reliability, and responsiveness of the 39-item "The Information Technology Scale in Nursing." Further testing of the developed instrument with a larger number of nurses from various backgrounds and different settings is recommended.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理信息技术量表的开发与验证。
背景:在患者护理中应用信息技术(IT)的情况日益增多。护理人员应做好使用此类技术的准备,以支持提供以患者为中心的护理。将信息学融入护理实践的进展速度慢于先进技术的发展速度,护士在哪些领域使用信息技术仍不明确:我们的目标是开发一种新的工具来确定信息技术在护理实践中的使用情况:方法:通过因子分析进行了一项方法学研究。共有 498 名大学医院(374 人)和初级护理中心(124 人)的注册护士参与了研究。调查问卷包括人口统计学特征和一个包含 50 个语句的项目库,用于收集数据。通过计算 Keiser-Meier-Olkin (KMO) 和 Bartlett 检验、探索性因子分析、描述性统计、Cronbach's α 和确认性因子分析,对问卷的有效性和可靠性进行了统计检验:该工具提取了 8 个因子,包括 39 个项目,解释了 55% 的方差:专业自主(α = 0.82)、数据共享/交流(α = 0.80)、数据管理(α = 0.79)、专业发展(α = 0.71)、管理(α = 0.76)、研究(α = 0.76)、信息(α = 0.68)和干预分类(α = 0.75)。总信度为 0.936。KMO 指数和抽样适当性测量值均较高(0.936);巴特利特球形度检验结果显著(p 结论:该研究为因子结构提供了证据:研究为 39 个项目的 "护理信息技术量表 "的因子结构、内部一致性、可靠性和响应性提供了证据。建议在更多来自不同背景和不同环境的护士中对所开发的工具进行进一步测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
期刊最新文献
Interventions to mitigate EHR and documentation burden in health professions trainees: A scoping review. A human-centered approach for designing a social care referral platform. Ethical dimensions of clinical data sharing by US healthcare organizations for purposes beyond direct patient care: Interviews with healthcare leaders. Special Issue on Informatics Education A Longitudinal Graduate Medical Education Curriculum in Clinical Informatics: Function, Structure, and Evaluation. Communication Challenges Experienced by Clinicians and Patients During Teleconsultation. Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1