Withdrawal catastrophizing scale: initial psychometric properties and implications for the study of opioid use disorder and hyperkatifeia.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1080/00952990.2023.2298257
Orman Trent Hall, Michael Vilensky, Julie E Teater, Craig Bryan, Kara Rood, Julie Niedermier, Parker Entrup, Stephanie Gorka, Anthony King, David A Williams, K Luan Phan
{"title":"Withdrawal catastrophizing scale: initial psychometric properties and implications for the study of opioid use disorder and hyperkatifeia.","authors":"Orman Trent Hall, Michael Vilensky, Julie E Teater, Craig Bryan, Kara Rood, Julie Niedermier, Parker Entrup, Stephanie Gorka, Anthony King, David A Williams, K Luan Phan","doi":"10.1080/00952990.2023.2298257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Discovery of modifiable factors influencing subjective withdrawal experience might advance opioid use disorder (OUD) research and precision treatment. This study explores one factor - withdrawal catastrophizing - a negative cognitive and emotional orientation toward withdrawal characterized by excessive fear, worry or inability to divert attention from withdrawal symptoms.<i>Objectives:</i> We define a novel concept - withdrawal catastrophizing - and present an initial evaluation of the Withdrawal Catastrophizing Scale (WCS).<i>Methods:</i> Prospective observational study (<i>n</i> = 122, 48.7% women). Factor structure (exploratory factor analysis) and internal consistency (Cronbach's α) were assessed. Predictive validity was tested via correlation between WCS and next-day subjective opiate withdrawal scale (SOWS) severity. The clinical salience of WCS was evaluated by correlation between WCS and withdrawal-motivated behaviors including risk taking, OUD maintenance, OUD treatment delay, history of leaving the hospital against medical advice and buprenorphine-precipitated withdrawal.<i>Results:</i> WCS was found to have a two-factor structure (distortion and despair), strong internal consistency (α = .901), and predictive validity - Greater withdrawal catastrophizing was associated with next-day SOWS (r<sub>s</sub> (99) = 0.237, <i>p</i> = .017). Withdrawal catastrophizing was also correlated with risk-taking behavior to relieve withdrawal (r<sub>s</sub> (119) = 0.357, <i>p</i> < .001); withdrawal-motivated OUD treatment avoidance (r<sub>s</sub> (119) = 0.421, <i>p</i> < .001), history of leaving the hospital against medical advice (r<sub>s</sub> (119) = 0.373, <i>p</i> < .001) and buprenorphine-precipitated withdrawal (r<sub>s</sub> (119) = 0.369, <i>p</i> < .001).<i>Conclusion:</i> This study provides first evidence of <i>withdrawal catastrophizing</i> as a clinically important phenomenon with implications for the future study and treatment of OUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":48957,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2023.2298257","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Discovery of modifiable factors influencing subjective withdrawal experience might advance opioid use disorder (OUD) research and precision treatment. This study explores one factor - withdrawal catastrophizing - a negative cognitive and emotional orientation toward withdrawal characterized by excessive fear, worry or inability to divert attention from withdrawal symptoms.Objectives: We define a novel concept - withdrawal catastrophizing - and present an initial evaluation of the Withdrawal Catastrophizing Scale (WCS).Methods: Prospective observational study (n = 122, 48.7% women). Factor structure (exploratory factor analysis) and internal consistency (Cronbach's α) were assessed. Predictive validity was tested via correlation between WCS and next-day subjective opiate withdrawal scale (SOWS) severity. The clinical salience of WCS was evaluated by correlation between WCS and withdrawal-motivated behaviors including risk taking, OUD maintenance, OUD treatment delay, history of leaving the hospital against medical advice and buprenorphine-precipitated withdrawal.Results: WCS was found to have a two-factor structure (distortion and despair), strong internal consistency (α = .901), and predictive validity - Greater withdrawal catastrophizing was associated with next-day SOWS (rs (99) = 0.237, p = .017). Withdrawal catastrophizing was also correlated with risk-taking behavior to relieve withdrawal (rs (119) = 0.357, p < .001); withdrawal-motivated OUD treatment avoidance (rs (119) = 0.421, p < .001), history of leaving the hospital against medical advice (rs (119) = 0.373, p < .001) and buprenorphine-precipitated withdrawal (rs (119) = 0.369, p < .001).Conclusion: This study provides first evidence of withdrawal catastrophizing as a clinically important phenomenon with implications for the future study and treatment of OUD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
戒断灾难化量表:初步心理测量特性及其对阿片类药物使用障碍和高成瘾性研究的影响。
背景:发现影响主观戒断体验的可改变因素可能会推动阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的研究和精准治疗。本研究探讨了一个因素--戒断灾难化--一种对戒断的负面认知和情感取向,其特点是过度恐惧、担心或无法转移对戒断症状的注意力:我们定义了一个新概念--戒断灾难化,并对戒断灾难化量表(WCS)进行了初步评估:方法:前瞻性观察研究(n = 122,48.7% 为女性)。评估了因子结构(探索性因子分析)和内部一致性(Cronbach's α)。通过 WCS 与次日主观鸦片制剂戒断量表(SOWS)严重程度之间的相关性检验了预测有效性。通过 WCS 与戒断动机行为(包括冒险行为、OUD 维持行为、OUD 治疗延迟、不听医嘱离开医院的历史以及丁丙诺啡诱发的戒断)之间的相关性,评估了 WCS 的临床显著性:研究发现,WCS 具有双因素结构(扭曲和绝望)、较强的内部一致性(α = .901)和预测有效性--更强的戒断灾难化与次日 SOWS 相关(rs (99) = 0.237, p = .017)。戒断灾难化还与缓解戒断的冒险行为相关(rs (119) = 0.357, p s (119) = 0.421, p s (119) = 0.373, p s (119) = 0.369, p 结论:本研究首次证明戒断灾难化是一种重要的临床现象,对今后研究和治疗 OUD 具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (AJDAA) is an international journal published six times per year and provides an important and stimulating venue for the exchange of ideas between the researchers working in diverse areas, including public policy, epidemiology, neurobiology, and the treatment of addictive disorders. AJDAA includes a wide range of translational research, covering preclinical and clinical aspects of the field. AJDAA covers these topics with focused data presentations and authoritative reviews of timely developments in our field. Manuscripts exploring addictions other than substance use disorders are encouraged. Reviews and Perspectives of emerging fields are given priority consideration. Areas of particular interest include: public health policy; novel research methodologies; human and animal pharmacology; human translational studies, including neuroimaging; pharmacological and behavioral treatments; new modalities of care; molecular and family genetic studies; medicinal use of substances traditionally considered substances of abuse.
期刊最新文献
Digital cognitive-behavioral therapy for substance use: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Risk factors of overdose in maternal patients with opioid use disorder: a scoping review. Substance use and help seeking as coping behaviors among parents and unpaid caregivers of adults in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. Plasma leptin levels are lower in females, but not males, with ketamine use disorder. Geographic trends in overall and long-acting opioid prescriptions under Medicaid and Medicare Part D in the United States, 2013-2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1