Comparison of percutaneous decannulation and open surgical repair for large-bore arterial access sites of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Perfusion-Uk Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-20 DOI:10.1177/02676591241241609
Alison Y Zhu, Charis Qy Tan, Graham Meredith
{"title":"Comparison of percutaneous decannulation and open surgical repair for large-bore arterial access sites of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.","authors":"Alison Y Zhu, Charis Qy Tan, Graham Meredith","doi":"10.1177/02676591241241609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Following weaning of peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support, removal of cannulas and repair of large-bore arterial sites is traditionally by open surgical repair (OSR). The use of a percutaneous vascular closure device (VCD) offers a minimally invasive alternative to OSR with potential for reduced operative complications, reduced hospital length of stay and in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of Medline and Embase databases was conducted for studies comparing VCD-assisted decannulation with OSR following decannulation of peripheral ECMO. The primary endpoint was rate of post-procedural complications, namely wound infection and limb ischaemia. The secondary endpoint was in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies, with a total of 685 patients, met inclusion criteria. Forty-eight percent (<i>n</i> = 328) of patients underwent VCD-assisted decannulation with the remainder decannulated by OSR. Pooled analysis demonstrated that patients undergoing VCD-assisted decannulation are at significantly lower risk of overall complications than surgical repair (OR 4.34; 95% CI 2.19-8.57; <i>p</i> < .001). Specifically, there was a substantial decrease in groin infections (OR 6.77; 95% CI 3.07-14.97; <i>p</i> < .001) without notable differences in limb ischaemia or pseudoaneurysm occurrence between the VCD and OSR cohorts. There was a lower incidence of intra-operative bleeding and haematoma in the VCD cohort (<i>p</i> < .001 and <i>p</i> = .002, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vascular closure device-assisted decannulation of peripheral ECMO offers a significantly reduced risk of complications, particularly groin infections and bleeding. Future research should encompass larger cohorts, randomised controlled trials, cost-benefit analyses, and the training of surgeons, cardiologists and intensivists in VCD-assisted decannulation, potentially through the integration of simulation-based training.</p>","PeriodicalId":49707,"journal":{"name":"Perfusion-Uk","volume":" ","pages":"308-316"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perfusion-Uk","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591241241609","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Following weaning of peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support, removal of cannulas and repair of large-bore arterial sites is traditionally by open surgical repair (OSR). The use of a percutaneous vascular closure device (VCD) offers a minimally invasive alternative to OSR with potential for reduced operative complications, reduced hospital length of stay and in-hospital mortality.

Methods: A systematic review of Medline and Embase databases was conducted for studies comparing VCD-assisted decannulation with OSR following decannulation of peripheral ECMO. The primary endpoint was rate of post-procedural complications, namely wound infection and limb ischaemia. The secondary endpoint was in-hospital mortality.

Results: Eight studies, with a total of 685 patients, met inclusion criteria. Forty-eight percent (n = 328) of patients underwent VCD-assisted decannulation with the remainder decannulated by OSR. Pooled analysis demonstrated that patients undergoing VCD-assisted decannulation are at significantly lower risk of overall complications than surgical repair (OR 4.34; 95% CI 2.19-8.57; p < .001). Specifically, there was a substantial decrease in groin infections (OR 6.77; 95% CI 3.07-14.97; p < .001) without notable differences in limb ischaemia or pseudoaneurysm occurrence between the VCD and OSR cohorts. There was a lower incidence of intra-operative bleeding and haematoma in the VCD cohort (p < .001 and p = .002, respectively).

Conclusion: Vascular closure device-assisted decannulation of peripheral ECMO offers a significantly reduced risk of complications, particularly groin infections and bleeding. Future research should encompass larger cohorts, randomised controlled trials, cost-benefit analyses, and the training of surgeons, cardiologists and intensivists in VCD-assisted decannulation, potentially through the integration of simulation-based training.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体外膜肺氧合大口径动脉通路部位的经皮剥离和开放式手术修复比较。
导言:断开外周静脉体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)支持后,拔除插管和修复大口径动脉部位的传统方法是开放手术修复(OSR)。经皮血管闭合器(VCD)的使用为开放手术修复提供了一种微创替代方法,有可能减少手术并发症、缩短住院时间并降低院内死亡率:方法: 对 Medline 和 Embase 数据库进行了系统性回顾,比较了外周 ECMO 拔管后 VCD 辅助拔管与 OSR 的研究。主要终点是术后并发症的发生率,即伤口感染和肢体缺血。次要终点是院内死亡率:共有八项研究符合纳入标准,共涉及 685 名患者。48%的患者(n = 328)在 VCD 辅助下进行了封堵,其余患者则通过 OSR 进行了封堵。汇总分析表明,与手术修复相比,接受 VCD 辅助注药的患者发生总体并发症的风险明显较低(OR 4.34; 95% CI 2.19-8.57; p < .001)。具体而言,腹股沟感染大幅减少(OR 6.77;95% CI 3.07-14.97;p < .001),但 VCD 和 OSR 两组患者的肢体缺血或假性动脉瘤发生率没有明显差异。VCD组的术中出血和血肿发生率较低(p < .001 和 p = .002):结论:血管闭合器辅助外周 ECMO 拔管可显著降低并发症风险,尤其是腹股沟感染和出血。未来的研究应包括更大规模的队列、随机对照试验、成本效益分析,以及对外科医生、心脏病专家和重症监护专家进行 VCD 辅助拔管的培训,可能的话可通过整合模拟培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perfusion-Uk
Perfusion-Uk 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perfusion is an ISI-ranked, peer-reviewed scholarly journal, which provides current information on all aspects of perfusion, oxygenation and biocompatibility and their use in modern cardiac surgery. The journal is at the forefront of international research and development and presents an appropriately multidisciplinary approach to perfusion science.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics and risk factors of delirium in patients on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Modifying veno - venous extra corporeal membrane oxygenation management for situs inversus totalis - A case report. Hypobaric type oxygenators - physics and physiology. Aortic root enlargement and replacement of the ascending aorta in type 0 aortic valve stenosis. Negative pressure therapy for ECMO cannula stabilization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1