Psychiatry and interdisciplinary pediatric palliative care: a scoping review.

4区 医学 Q2 Nursing Annals of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-15 DOI:10.21037/apm-23-501
Alison E Cress
{"title":"Psychiatry and interdisciplinary pediatric palliative care: a scoping review.","authors":"Alison E Cress","doi":"10.21037/apm-23-501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current literature highlights the need for psychological support of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with serious illness, for which pediatric palliative care (PPC) teams are often responsible. This scoping review aims to inventory the most current literature based on discipline, geography, population, methodology, and themes among interdisciplinary PPC teams and the management of psychological distress in AYAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a scoping review design, a protocol was registered in Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/fb48n/). Sources for evidence included online databases (Scopus, PubMed, Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL), Google Scholar, clinical manuals, texts, national organization webpages, and reference lists, all searched June, 2023. Interviews with content experts and authors identified additional sources. Those describing interdisciplinary palliative care (PC) and management of psychological/psychiatric distress in seriously ill AYAs, written in English, and completed in the U.S. between 2018-2023 were included. International citations were included if American literature was reviewed, or if authors described internationally developed PC standards by which American providers must practice. Clear and comprehensive data charting was completed by an independent reviewer, using a deductive approach with a standardized data-charting form developed prior to extraction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-five references met inclusion criteria. Psychologists most frequently published in the past 5 years regarding integration of their care into palliative teams. Authors wrote from eastern U.S., qualitatively studying the PC team in the oncology space. Of eight themes identified, barriers, facilitators, and interventions were most frequently reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Role delineation among PPC teams can be difficult in the management of psychological distress, due to lack of training and consistent collaboration models among cancer and non-cancer populations. Current literature highlights a large gap in psychological/psychiatric training. However, optimized pain control, routine screening of distress, open/honest/developmentally appropriate communication, and early advance care planning are interventions by which palliative providers can begin managing psychological distress in seriously ill AYAs. While the presence of psychologists and psychiatrists is widely variable among PPC teams, their expertise can vastly advance the field of PC, through collaboration, education, research, and advocacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"415-427"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-23-501","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current literature highlights the need for psychological support of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with serious illness, for which pediatric palliative care (PPC) teams are often responsible. This scoping review aims to inventory the most current literature based on discipline, geography, population, methodology, and themes among interdisciplinary PPC teams and the management of psychological distress in AYAs.

Methods: Using a scoping review design, a protocol was registered in Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/fb48n/). Sources for evidence included online databases (Scopus, PubMed, Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL), Google Scholar, clinical manuals, texts, national organization webpages, and reference lists, all searched June, 2023. Interviews with content experts and authors identified additional sources. Those describing interdisciplinary palliative care (PC) and management of psychological/psychiatric distress in seriously ill AYAs, written in English, and completed in the U.S. between 2018-2023 were included. International citations were included if American literature was reviewed, or if authors described internationally developed PC standards by which American providers must practice. Clear and comprehensive data charting was completed by an independent reviewer, using a deductive approach with a standardized data-charting form developed prior to extraction.

Results: Sixty-five references met inclusion criteria. Psychologists most frequently published in the past 5 years regarding integration of their care into palliative teams. Authors wrote from eastern U.S., qualitatively studying the PC team in the oncology space. Of eight themes identified, barriers, facilitators, and interventions were most frequently reported.

Conclusions: Role delineation among PPC teams can be difficult in the management of psychological distress, due to lack of training and consistent collaboration models among cancer and non-cancer populations. Current literature highlights a large gap in psychological/psychiatric training. However, optimized pain control, routine screening of distress, open/honest/developmentally appropriate communication, and early advance care planning are interventions by which palliative providers can begin managing psychological distress in seriously ill AYAs. While the presence of psychologists and psychiatrists is widely variable among PPC teams, their expertise can vastly advance the field of PC, through collaboration, education, research, and advocacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神病学与跨学科儿科姑息关怀:范围界定综述。
背景:目前的文献强调了对患有重病的青少年和年轻成人(AYAs)提供心理支持的必要性,而儿科姑息关怀(PPC)团队通常负责为这些青少年和年轻成人提供心理支持。本范围综述旨在根据学科、地域、人群、方法和跨学科姑息关怀团队的主题以及对青少年和年轻人心理困扰的管理,对最新的文献进行盘点:采用范围审查设计,在开放科学框架(https://osf. io/fb48n/)中注册了一项协议。证据来源包括在线数据库(Scopus、PubMed、Embase、PsycInfo、CINAHL)、谷歌学术(Google Scholar)、临床手册、文本、国家组织网页和参考文献列表,所有检索时间均为 2023 年 6 月。与内容专家和作者的访谈还发现了其他资料来源。纳入了那些描述跨学科姑息关怀(PC)和重症亚青病患者心理/精神压力管理的、以英语撰写的、2018-2023年间在美国完成的文献。如果对美国文献进行了综述,或者作者描述了美国医疗服务提供者必须遵循的国际制定的 PC 标准,则纳入国际引文。由一名独立审稿人使用演绎法完成了清晰而全面的数据图表,并在提取数据前制定了标准化的数据图表表格:结果:65 篇参考文献符合纳入标准。心理学家在过去 5 年中发表的关于将其护理纳入姑息治疗团队的文章最多。作者来自美国东部,对肿瘤领域的姑息治疗团队进行了定性研究。在确定的八个主题中,障碍、促进因素和干预措施是最常见的报告主题:结论:由于癌症和非癌症人群之间缺乏培训和一致的合作模式,PPC 团队在处理心理困扰时很难进行角色划分。目前的文献凸显了心理/精神培训方面的巨大差距。然而,优化疼痛控制、常规心理压力筛查、开放/坦诚/适合儿童发展的沟通以及早期预后护理计划等干预措施,都是姑息治疗提供者可以开始管理重症亚青病患心理压力的方法。虽然心理学家和精神科医生在姑息治疗团队中的存在差异很大,但他们的专业知识可以通过合作、教育、研究和宣传,极大地推动姑息治疗领域的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of palliative medicine
Annals of palliative medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
231
期刊介绍: Annals of Palliative Medicine (Ann Palliat Med; Print ISSN 2224-5820; Online ISSN 2224-5839) is an open access, international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly with both online and printed copies since 2012. The aim of the journal is to provide up-to-date and cutting-edge information and professional support for health care providers in palliative medicine disciplines to improve the quality of life for patients and their families and caregivers.
期刊最新文献
A narrative review of the challenges and impact of breast cancer treatment in older adults beyond cancer diagnosis. Palliative care and hepatobiliary malignancies: say no to late referral. Stepped palliative care: considerations for equitable implementation. Breast cancer survivorship care: a narrative review of challenges and future directions. Surveillance of patients after palliative radiation, how to make it feasible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1