Performance of a single-use gastroscope for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: Prospective evaluation.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2024-03-18 eCollection Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2271-2303
Koen van der Ploeg, Pieter J F de Jonge, Wim J Lammers, Arjun Dave Koch, Margreet C Vos, Vemund Paulsen, Lars Aabakken, Marco Bruno
{"title":"Performance of a single-use gastroscope for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: Prospective evaluation.","authors":"Koen van der Ploeg, Pieter J F de Jonge, Wim J Lammers, Arjun Dave Koch, Margreet C Vos, Vemund Paulsen, Lars Aabakken, Marco Bruno","doi":"10.1055/a-2271-2303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Reprocessing reusable endoscopes is challenging due to their non-sterilizable nature. Disinfection has been shown to have a significant risk of failure with serious consequences. Single-use endoscopes can eliminate contamination risk and reduce workflow delays caused by reprocessing. This study evaluated the clinical performance of single-use gastroscopes in patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). <b>Patients and methods</b> In this case series, 60 patients underwent EGD using single-use gastroscopes, with 34 procedures in the endoscopy department and 26 in the intensive care unit. The primary outcome was successful completion of the intended EGD objective. Furthermore, certified endoscopists assessed device performance on a five-point Likert scale (ranging from 1-\"much worse\" to 5-\"much better\"), considering their experience with a reusable gastroscope. <b>Results</b> Successful completion of EGDs using only the single-use gastroscope was achieved in 58 of 60 cases (96.7%). In two cases, crossover to an ultra-slim endoscope was necessary to either reach the esophageal stenosis or to transverse the stenosis. Overall satisfaction was rated as comparable to reusable scopes in 51 of 56 cases (91.1%) and inferior in five cases (8.9%). The lower weight of the single-use gastroscope was rated as superior in 42 of 60 cases (70.0%). Drawbacks included reduced image quality (23 of 45 cases; 51.1%). Feedback included the absence of a freeze button, lens cleaning issues, and small image size. <b>Conclusions</b> Single-use gastroscopes exhibited a high EGD completion rate and effectiveness for various indications. Further research should focus on evaluating the implementation of single-use gastroscopes in a comprehensive context, considering clinical effectiveness, costs, and environmental impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 3","pages":"E428-E434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10948268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2271-2303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims Reprocessing reusable endoscopes is challenging due to their non-sterilizable nature. Disinfection has been shown to have a significant risk of failure with serious consequences. Single-use endoscopes can eliminate contamination risk and reduce workflow delays caused by reprocessing. This study evaluated the clinical performance of single-use gastroscopes in patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Patients and methods In this case series, 60 patients underwent EGD using single-use gastroscopes, with 34 procedures in the endoscopy department and 26 in the intensive care unit. The primary outcome was successful completion of the intended EGD objective. Furthermore, certified endoscopists assessed device performance on a five-point Likert scale (ranging from 1-"much worse" to 5-"much better"), considering their experience with a reusable gastroscope. Results Successful completion of EGDs using only the single-use gastroscope was achieved in 58 of 60 cases (96.7%). In two cases, crossover to an ultra-slim endoscope was necessary to either reach the esophageal stenosis or to transverse the stenosis. Overall satisfaction was rated as comparable to reusable scopes in 51 of 56 cases (91.1%) and inferior in five cases (8.9%). The lower weight of the single-use gastroscope was rated as superior in 42 of 60 cases (70.0%). Drawbacks included reduced image quality (23 of 45 cases; 51.1%). Feedback included the absence of a freeze button, lens cleaning issues, and small image size. Conclusions Single-use gastroscopes exhibited a high EGD completion rate and effectiveness for various indications. Further research should focus on evaluating the implementation of single-use gastroscopes in a comprehensive context, considering clinical effectiveness, costs, and environmental impact.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于食管胃十二指肠镜检查的一次性胃镜的性能:前瞻性评估
背景和研究目的 由于可重复使用的内窥镜具有不可消毒的特性,因此对其进行再处理具有挑战性。事实证明,消毒失败的风险很大,后果很严重。一次性内窥镜可以消除污染风险,减少再处理造成的工作流程延误。本研究评估了一次性胃镜在接受食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)患者中的临床表现。患者和方法 在这项病例系列研究中,60 名患者使用一次性胃镜接受了食管胃十二指肠镜检查,其中 34 例在内镜部门进行,26 例在重症监护室进行。主要结果是成功完成了预定的胃肠造影检查目标。此外,经过认证的内镜医师根据他们使用可重复使用胃镜的经验,采用李克特五点量表(从1-"差很多 "到5-"好很多")对设备性能进行评估。结果 60 例病例中有 58 例(96.7%)仅使用一次性胃镜就成功完成了胃肠造影检查。在两个病例中,必须使用超薄内窥镜才能到达食管狭窄处或横穿狭窄处。在 56 个病例中,有 51 个病例(91.1%)的总体满意度与可重复使用内窥镜相当,有 5 个病例(8.9%)的总体满意度低于可重复使用内窥镜。在 60 个病例中,42 个病例(70.0%)认为一次性胃镜的重量较轻。缺点包括图像质量下降(45 例中有 23 例;51.1%)。反馈意见包括没有冷冻按钮、镜头清洁问题和图像尺寸小。结论 一次性使用胃镜显示出较高的胃肠造影检查完成率和对各种适应症的有效性。进一步的研究应侧重于在综合考虑临床效果、成本和环境影响的前提下评估一次性使用胃镜的实施情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
期刊最新文献
New cholangiopancreatoscopy-assisted diagnosis of disconnected pancreatic cuct syndrome and bridging disconnected pancreatic duct. Colonoscopy is not mammography: Challenges of applying the Duty of Candor. Complete extraction of main pancreatic duct residual and microstones using an 8-wire basket catheter. Costs and benefits of a formal quality framework for colonoscopy: Economic evaluation. Defining standards for fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy using Delphi methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1