Letter to the Editor: Comparing the Novel Parameter 'Slope of the Steepest Part of Hemolysis Curve' to Standard Median Corpuscular Fragility for Evaluating Erythrocyte Stability during Prolonged Storage.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Annals of clinical and laboratory science Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Marijana Marković Boras, Kristina Kvesić, Stanislava Talić, Dragana Pušić
{"title":"<i>Letter to the Editor:</i> Comparing the Novel Parameter 'Slope of the Steepest Part of Hemolysis Curve' to Standard Median Corpuscular Fragility for Evaluating Erythrocyte Stability during Prolonged Storage.","authors":"Marijana Marković Boras, Kristina Kvesić, Stanislava Talić, Dragana Pušić","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Several ways for presenting the results of osmotic fragility test have been described in the literature. Our aim was to compare the utility of a novel parameter for assessment of erythrocyte osmotic properties, i.e., 'Slope of the steepest part of hemolysis curve' with the most frequently used parameter 'Median corpuscular fragility' in order to assess the stability of erythrocytes in a blood sample during prolonged storage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten whole blood samples were obtained from healthy donors. The osmotic fragility test was initially conducted on the day of venipuncture, and subsequent analyses were carried out on days 1, 2, 4, 7, 9, 11, and 14 after the venipuncture. Mean hemolysis percentage values were used to construct hemolysis curves. The steepest parts of hemolysis curves were estimated to be linear, and lines that overlapped those parts of the curves were created. The slope of these lines was calculated, and the resulting mean values are presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant increase in Median corpuscular fragility values was observed, starting from day of venipuncture. We compared the average values for each day of analysis. The first significant difference in Median corpuscular fragility values was observed on day 4 compared to the day of venipuncture (<i>p</i>=0.006), with values 0.53±0.030 % and 0.41±0.014% respectively. Meanwhile, differences in the values of the slopes of the steepest parts of hemolysis curves were observed as early as day 2 when compared to the day of venipuncture (<i>p</i>=0.046), with values of -966.23±233.07 and -588.01±222.85, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prolonged storage of whole blood samples leads to an increase in osmotic fragility and alters the shape of the hemolysis curve. These changes suggest that postponing the osmotic fragility test could lead to diagnostic inaccuracies. These findings suggest that slope value is a more accurate parameter for evaluating erythrocyte stability during storage, compared to commonly used Median corpuscular fragility value. Hence, it has potential importance and can be complementary to the laboratory result of the OFT. Therefore, it can be useful to provide these results jointly with the results of the OFT test.</p>","PeriodicalId":8228,"journal":{"name":"Annals of clinical and laboratory science","volume":"54 1","pages":"121-125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of clinical and laboratory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Several ways for presenting the results of osmotic fragility test have been described in the literature. Our aim was to compare the utility of a novel parameter for assessment of erythrocyte osmotic properties, i.e., 'Slope of the steepest part of hemolysis curve' with the most frequently used parameter 'Median corpuscular fragility' in order to assess the stability of erythrocytes in a blood sample during prolonged storage.

Methods: Ten whole blood samples were obtained from healthy donors. The osmotic fragility test was initially conducted on the day of venipuncture, and subsequent analyses were carried out on days 1, 2, 4, 7, 9, 11, and 14 after the venipuncture. Mean hemolysis percentage values were used to construct hemolysis curves. The steepest parts of hemolysis curves were estimated to be linear, and lines that overlapped those parts of the curves were created. The slope of these lines was calculated, and the resulting mean values are presented.

Results: A significant increase in Median corpuscular fragility values was observed, starting from day of venipuncture. We compared the average values for each day of analysis. The first significant difference in Median corpuscular fragility values was observed on day 4 compared to the day of venipuncture (p=0.006), with values 0.53±0.030 % and 0.41±0.014% respectively. Meanwhile, differences in the values of the slopes of the steepest parts of hemolysis curves were observed as early as day 2 when compared to the day of venipuncture (p=0.046), with values of -966.23±233.07 and -588.01±222.85, respectively.

Conclusion: Prolonged storage of whole blood samples leads to an increase in osmotic fragility and alters the shape of the hemolysis curve. These changes suggest that postponing the osmotic fragility test could lead to diagnostic inaccuracies. These findings suggest that slope value is a more accurate parameter for evaluating erythrocyte stability during storage, compared to commonly used Median corpuscular fragility value. Hence, it has potential importance and can be complementary to the laboratory result of the OFT. Therefore, it can be useful to provide these results jointly with the results of the OFT test.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
致编辑的信:比较新参数 "溶血曲线最陡峭部分的斜率 "与标准中位体细胞脆性,以评估红细胞在长期储存过程中的稳定性。
目的:文献中描述了几种呈现渗透脆性测试结果的方法。我们的目的是比较用于评估红细胞渗透特性的新参数(即 "溶血曲线最陡部分的斜率")与最常用的参数 "中位血球脆性 "的实用性,以评估血液样本中的红细胞在长期储存过程中的稳定性:方法:从健康献血者处采集 10 份全血样本。渗透脆性测试最初在静脉穿刺当天进行,随后在静脉穿刺后的第 1、2、4、7、9、11 和 14 天进行分析。平均溶血百分比值用于构建溶血曲线。估计溶血曲线最陡峭的部分为线性,并绘制与这些部分重叠的直线。结果:结果:从静脉穿刺当天开始,中位血球脆性值明显增加。我们比较了每天分析的平均值。与静脉穿刺当天相比,第 4 天观察到中位体液脆性值首次出现明显差异(p=0.006),分别为 0.53±0.030 % 和 0.41±0.014%。同时,与静脉穿刺当天相比,溶血曲线最陡部分的斜率值早在第 2 天就出现了差异(p=0.046),分别为 -966.23±233.07 和 -588.01±222.85:结论:长时间储存全血样本会导致渗透脆性增加,并改变溶血曲线的形状。这些变化表明,推迟渗透脆性试验可能会导致诊断不准确。这些研究结果表明,与常用的中位红细胞脆性值相比,斜率值是评估红细胞在储存期间稳定性的更准确参数。因此,斜率值具有潜在的重要性,可作为 OFT 实验室结果的补充。因此,将这些结果与 OFT 检测结果一并提供会很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of clinical and laboratory science
Annals of clinical and laboratory science 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science welcomes manuscripts that report research in clinical science, including pathology, clinical chemistry, biotechnology, molecular biology, cytogenetics, microbiology, immunology, hematology, transfusion medicine, organ and tissue transplantation, therapeutics, toxicology, and clinical informatics.
期刊最新文献
Communication: 4-Hydroxynonenal and Fracture Risk in the Community-Dwelling Older People. Letter to the Editor. Evaluation of Swab: Direct Extraction Kit, Comparing with AdvanSure E3 System for Nucleic Acid Extraction in Identification of SARS-CoV-2. A Case of Hb Phnom Penh Showing Different HbA1c Levels Depending on the High-Performance Liquid Chromatography System. Application of IdyllaTM System for Rapid Evaluation of EGFR Mutation Status in Formalin-Fixed and Paraffin-Embedded Samples of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Biomarkers Identification of Early Rheumatoid Arthritis via Bioinformatics Approach and Experimental Verification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1