How can the Sendai framework be implemented for disaster risk reduction and sustainable development? A qualitative study in Iran.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Globalization and Health Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1186/s12992-024-01028-w
Mahmood Nekoei-Moghadam, Seyed Mobin Moradi, Asghar Tavan
{"title":"How can the Sendai framework be implemented for disaster risk reduction and sustainable development? A qualitative study in Iran.","authors":"Mahmood Nekoei-Moghadam, Seyed Mobin Moradi, Asghar Tavan","doi":"10.1186/s12992-024-01028-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Sendai Framework is the United Nations' most significant approach to reducing the risk of disasters from 2015 to 2030. This framework designed for all communities. However, communities should create operational and remedial strategies based on their unique circumstances. Considering the gaps in the implementation of Sendai framework strategies in Iran, as a developing country, the present study was designed.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study was conducted by using a qualitative direct content analysis method to find out the expert's opinions on the implementation of the Sendai framework in Iran from 2021 to 2023. 35 experts in the focus group discussion and 9 experts in the interview were the participants of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study findings were merged and reported as one main theme entitled Executive actions for implementing the Sendai Framework, four categories, and 37 codes. Eleven codes for the strategy of understanding disaster risk, 11 codes for the strategy of strengthening disaster risk governance to manage disaster risk, eight codes for the strategy of Investing in disaster risk reduction for resilience, and finally, seven codes for the strategy of enhancing disaster preparedness for effective response and to \"Build Back Better\" in recovery, rehabilitation, and reconstruction were identified as implementation solutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Sendai Framework has not provided any detailed implementation solutions because the countries' economic, social, level of development, etc., are different. The study's findings can be used as a guide for other developing countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":12747,"journal":{"name":"Globalization and Health","volume":"20 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10958849/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Globalization and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-024-01028-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Sendai Framework is the United Nations' most significant approach to reducing the risk of disasters from 2015 to 2030. This framework designed for all communities. However, communities should create operational and remedial strategies based on their unique circumstances. Considering the gaps in the implementation of Sendai framework strategies in Iran, as a developing country, the present study was designed.

Method: This study was conducted by using a qualitative direct content analysis method to find out the expert's opinions on the implementation of the Sendai framework in Iran from 2021 to 2023. 35 experts in the focus group discussion and 9 experts in the interview were the participants of the study.

Results: Study findings were merged and reported as one main theme entitled Executive actions for implementing the Sendai Framework, four categories, and 37 codes. Eleven codes for the strategy of understanding disaster risk, 11 codes for the strategy of strengthening disaster risk governance to manage disaster risk, eight codes for the strategy of Investing in disaster risk reduction for resilience, and finally, seven codes for the strategy of enhancing disaster preparedness for effective response and to "Build Back Better" in recovery, rehabilitation, and reconstruction were identified as implementation solutions.

Conclusion: The Sendai Framework has not provided any detailed implementation solutions because the countries' economic, social, level of development, etc., are different. The study's findings can be used as a guide for other developing countries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何实施仙台框架以减少灾害风险和促进可持续发展?伊朗的定性研究。
背景:仙台框架是联合国在 2015 年至 2030 年期间减少灾害风险的最重要方法。该框架面向所有社区。然而,各社区应根据其独特情况制定业务和补救战略。考虑到伊朗作为发展中国家在实施仙台框架战略方面存在的差距,我们设计了本研究:本研究采用定性直接内容分析法,以了解专家对 2021 年至 2023 年在伊朗实施仙台框架的看法。35 名专家参加了焦点小组讨论,9 名专家参加了访谈:研究结果合并为一个题为 "实施仙台框架的执行行动 "的主题、四个类别和 37 个代码。了解灾害风险的战略有 11 个代码,加强灾害风险治理以管理灾害风险的战略有 11 个代码,投资于减少灾害风险以提高抗灾能力的战略有 8 个代码,最后,加强备灾以有效应对灾害和在恢复、复原和重建中 "重建得更好 "的战略有 7 个代码被确定为实施方案:结论:由于各国的经济、社会和发展水平不同,仙台框架并没有提供详细的实施方案。研究结果可作为其他发展中国家的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Globalization and Health
Globalization and Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: "Globalization and Health" is a pioneering transdisciplinary journal dedicated to situating public health and well-being within the dynamic forces of global development. The journal is committed to publishing high-quality, original research that explores the impact of globalization processes on global public health. This includes examining how globalization influences health systems and the social, economic, commercial, and political determinants of health. The journal welcomes contributions from various disciplines, including policy, health systems, political economy, international relations, and community perspectives. While single-country studies are accepted, they must emphasize global/globalization mechanisms and their relevance to global-level policy discourse and decision-making.
期刊最新文献
Logics of (dis)engagement: mapping variation in non-government norms and approaches to alcohol, ultra-processed food and related industries - a case study from Australia. Young adults in times of overlapping social crises: dynamic profiles of mental health and crisis-related concerns using latent transition analysis. Back home, beyond borders: a bioecological study of returnee public health scholars in a globalized health system. Health policy, collaboration and investment in the post-COVID era: a review from UHC and health security integration perspective. The well-being toll of revealed involuntary immobility: a quantitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1