Evaluating compliance with the best practice guidelines for wrong-level surgery prevention in high-risk pediatric spine surgery.

IF 1.6 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine deformity Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1007/s43390-024-00836-9
Alondra Concepción-González, J Manuel Sarmiento, Christina C Rymond, Chinenye Ezeh, Rishi Sinha, Hannah Lin, Kevin Lu, Afrain Z Boby, Prakash Gorroochurn, A Noelle Larson, Benjamin D Roye, Brice Ilharreborde, Michael G Vitale
{"title":"Evaluating compliance with the best practice guidelines for wrong-level surgery prevention in high-risk pediatric spine surgery.","authors":"Alondra Concepción-González, J Manuel Sarmiento, Christina C Rymond, Chinenye Ezeh, Rishi Sinha, Hannah Lin, Kevin Lu, Afrain Z Boby, Prakash Gorroochurn, A Noelle Larson, Benjamin D Roye, Brice Ilharreborde, Michael G Vitale","doi":"10.1007/s43390-024-00836-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In 2018, Best Practice Guidelines (BPGs) were published for preventing wrong-level surgery in pediatric spinal deformity, but successful implementation has not been established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate BPG compliance 5 years after publication. We hypothesized higher compliance among BPG authors and among surgeons with more experience, higher caseload, and awareness of the BPGs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried North American and European surgeons, authors and nonauthors, and members of pediatric spinal study groups on adherence to BPGs using an anonymous survey consisting of 18 Likert scale questions. Respondents provided years in practice, yearly caseload, and guideline awareness. Mean compliance scores (MCS) were developed by correlating Likert responses with MCS scores (\"None of the time\" = no compliance = MCS 0, \"Sometimes\" = weak to moderate = MCS 1, \"Most of the time\" = high = MCS 2, and \"All the time\" = perfect = MCS 3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 134 respondents, 81.5% reported high or perfect compliance. Average MCS for all guidelines was 2.4 ± 0.4. North American and European surgeons showed no compliance differences (2.4 vs. 2.3, p = 0.07). Authors and nonauthors showed significantly different compliance scores (2.8 vs 2.4, p < 0.001), as did surgeons with and without knowledge of the BPGs (2.5 vs 2.2, p < 0.001). BPG awareness and compliance showed a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.48, p < 0.001), with non-significant associations between compliance and both years in practice (r = 0.41, p = 0.64) and yearly caseload (r = 0.02, p = 0.87).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgeons reported high or perfect compliance 81.5% of the time with BPGs for preventing wrong-level surgery. Authorship and BPG awareness showed increased compliance. Location, study group membership, years in practice, and yearly caseload did not affect compliance.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level V-expert opinion.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-00836-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In 2018, Best Practice Guidelines (BPGs) were published for preventing wrong-level surgery in pediatric spinal deformity, but successful implementation has not been established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate BPG compliance 5 years after publication. We hypothesized higher compliance among BPG authors and among surgeons with more experience, higher caseload, and awareness of the BPGs.

Methods: We queried North American and European surgeons, authors and nonauthors, and members of pediatric spinal study groups on adherence to BPGs using an anonymous survey consisting of 18 Likert scale questions. Respondents provided years in practice, yearly caseload, and guideline awareness. Mean compliance scores (MCS) were developed by correlating Likert responses with MCS scores ("None of the time" = no compliance = MCS 0, "Sometimes" = weak to moderate = MCS 1, "Most of the time" = high = MCS 2, and "All the time" = perfect = MCS 3).

Results: Of the 134 respondents, 81.5% reported high or perfect compliance. Average MCS for all guidelines was 2.4 ± 0.4. North American and European surgeons showed no compliance differences (2.4 vs. 2.3, p = 0.07). Authors and nonauthors showed significantly different compliance scores (2.8 vs 2.4, p < 0.001), as did surgeons with and without knowledge of the BPGs (2.5 vs 2.2, p < 0.001). BPG awareness and compliance showed a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.48, p < 0.001), with non-significant associations between compliance and both years in practice (r = 0.41, p = 0.64) and yearly caseload (r = 0.02, p = 0.87).

Conclusion: Surgeons reported high or perfect compliance 81.5% of the time with BPGs for preventing wrong-level surgery. Authorship and BPG awareness showed increased compliance. Location, study group membership, years in practice, and yearly caseload did not affect compliance.

Level of evidence: Level V-expert opinion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估高风险儿科脊柱手术中预防错层手术最佳实践指南的遵守情况。
目的:2018 年,发布了预防小儿脊柱畸形错位手术的《最佳实践指南》(BPG),但尚未确定能否成功实施。本研究旨在评估 BPG 发布 5 年后的合规性。我们假设 BPG 的作者以及经验更丰富、病例数更多、对 BPG 有更高认识的外科医生对 BPG 的遵从度更高:我们采用匿名调查的方式询问了北美和欧洲的外科医生、作者和非作者,以及小儿脊柱研究小组的成员对 BPGs 的遵守情况,调查包括 18 个李克特量表问题。受访者提供了从业年限、年工作量和对指南的认识。通过将 Likert 回答与 MCS 分数相关联("从不"= 不遵守 = MCS 0,"有时"= 弱到中等 = MCS 1,"大部分时间"= 高 = MCS 2,"所有时间"= 完美 = MCS 3),得出平均遵守分数(MCS):结果:在 134 位受访者中,81.5% 的受访者表示高度或完全遵守准则。所有指南的平均 MCS 为 2.4 ± 0.4。北美和欧洲的外科医生在符合性方面没有差异(2.4 vs. 2.3,p = 0.07)。作者和非作者的依从性得分有显著差异(2.8 vs 2.4,p 结论:作者和非作者的依从性得分有显著差异:外科医生在 81.5% 的情况下高度或完全遵守了防止错误水平手术的 BPG。作者身份和对 BPG 的认识提高了依从性。地点、研究小组成员资格、从业年限和每年的病例量并不影响依从性:证据等级:V级-专家意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
18.80%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.
期刊最新文献
18th International Congress on Early Onset Scoliosis and the Growing Spine : November 13-15, 2024 Scottsdale, Arizona, USA. A team approach to improve outcomes in pediatric scoliosis surgery: a review of the current literature. Research trends of biomechanics in scoliosis from 1999 to 2023: a bibliometric analysis. Is the information provided by large language models valid in educating patients about adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? An evaluation of content, clarity, and empathy : The perspective of the European Spine Study Group. What imaging does my AIS patient need? A multi-group survey of provider preferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1