Comparison of two different orthoses used in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Prosthetics and Orthotics International Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1097/PXR.0000000000000345
Mustafa Sarı, Demet Öztürk, Nilgün Bek
{"title":"Comparison of two different orthoses used in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis.","authors":"Mustafa Sarı, Demet Öztürk, Nilgün Bek","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is one of the most common causes of lateral elbow pain, and orthoses are often used in its conservative treatment. However, the number of studies examining the effectiveness of the orthoses used and their differences compared to each other is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effects of 2 orthoses types, wrist orthosis (WO) and counterforce brace (CB), commonly used in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis on muscle activation, grip strength, hand function, and satisfaction level in healthy individuals.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Quasi-experimental study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-seven healthy individuals were recruited. Muscle activation was evaluated by surface electromyography, and maximum grip strength was evaluated with a handheld dynamometer. Hand function and satisfaction level were evaluated with Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test and Orthotics and Prosthetics Users Survey, respectively. All evaluations were conducted for each individual in 3 conditions (no orthosis, WO, and CB).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Extensor carpi radialis (ECR) muscle activation was greater when using CB compared with that when without orthosis ( p = 0.036). There was no significant difference in extensor digitorum communis (EDC) muscle activation and maximum grip strength among the conditions ( p > 0.05). Hand function was worse when using the WO compared with the other conditions ( p < 0.001). In terms of orthosis satisfaction, individuals were found to be significantly more satisfied with the use of CB ( p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our study highlight the use of CB in terms of EDC muscle activity, grip strength, hand function, and satisfaction, while the use of WO is prominent in terms of keeping extensor carpi radialis muscle activity low, which has been shown to be important for LE. To obtain definitive results on the effectiveness of different orthoses in the treatment of LE, more research is needed to compare the muscular activation in the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) and EDC muscles with objective methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":" ","pages":"127-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000345","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is one of the most common causes of lateral elbow pain, and orthoses are often used in its conservative treatment. However, the number of studies examining the effectiveness of the orthoses used and their differences compared to each other is limited.

Objective: To determine the effects of 2 orthoses types, wrist orthosis (WO) and counterforce brace (CB), commonly used in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis on muscle activation, grip strength, hand function, and satisfaction level in healthy individuals.

Study design: Quasi-experimental study.

Methods: Thirty-seven healthy individuals were recruited. Muscle activation was evaluated by surface electromyography, and maximum grip strength was evaluated with a handheld dynamometer. Hand function and satisfaction level were evaluated with Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test and Orthotics and Prosthetics Users Survey, respectively. All evaluations were conducted for each individual in 3 conditions (no orthosis, WO, and CB).

Results: Extensor carpi radialis (ECR) muscle activation was greater when using CB compared with that when without orthosis ( p = 0.036). There was no significant difference in extensor digitorum communis (EDC) muscle activation and maximum grip strength among the conditions ( p > 0.05). Hand function was worse when using the WO compared with the other conditions ( p < 0.001). In terms of orthosis satisfaction, individuals were found to be significantly more satisfied with the use of CB ( p = 0.001).

Conclusions: In our study highlight the use of CB in terms of EDC muscle activity, grip strength, hand function, and satisfaction, while the use of WO is prominent in terms of keeping extensor carpi radialis muscle activity low, which has been shown to be important for LE. To obtain definitive results on the effectiveness of different orthoses in the treatment of LE, more research is needed to compare the muscular activation in the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) and EDC muscles with objective methods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于治疗外侧上髁炎的两种不同矫形器的比较。
背景:外上髁炎(LE)是导致肘外侧疼痛的最常见原因之一,矫形器常用于其保守治疗。然而,对所使用矫形器的有效性及其相互间差异进行研究的数量有限:研究设计:准实验研究:研究设计:准实验研究:方法:招募 37 名健康人。用表面肌电图评估肌肉激活情况,用手持式测力计评估最大握力。手部功能和满意度分别通过捷成泰勒手部功能测试和矫形器与假肢使用者调查进行评估。所有评估都是在 3 种条件下(无矫形器、WO 和 CB)对每个人进行的:结果:与不使用矫形器时相比,使用 CB 时伸腕肌(ECR)的激活程度更高(p = 0.036)。在不同条件下,拇趾伸肌(EDC)的激活度和最大握力没有明显差异(P > 0.05)。与其他条件相比,使用 WO 时手部功能较差(p < 0.001)。在矫形器满意度方面,使用 CB 的患者满意度明显更高(p = 0.001):在我们的研究中,CB矫形器的使用突出表现在EDC肌肉活动、握力、手部功能和满意度方面,而WO矫形器的使用突出表现在保持较低的桡侧伸肌活动方面,这一点已被证明对LE非常重要。为了获得不同矫形器对治疗 LE 的有效性的确切结果,需要进行更多的研究,用客观的方法比较桡侧腕伸肌(ECRB)和桡侧腕伸肌的肌肉活动情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
期刊最新文献
Returning to work after dysvascular lower limb amputation-A novel multivariate approach to examine relative contributions of biopsychosocial predictors. Biomechanical effects of foot orthoses on jump landing performance: A systematic review. Which factors may influence medium-term quality of life of patients with lower-limb loss? A systematic review of the literature. What are relevant predictors of physical activity in older adults with lower limb loss (LLL)? Results of a retrospective analysis. A scoping review on upper extremity prostheses: Satisfaction, barriers, and their implications in resource-limited countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1