A machine learning stacking model accurately estimating gastric fluid volume in patients undergoing elective sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Postgraduate medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1080/00325481.2024.2333720
Yuqing Yan, Yuzhan Jin, Yaoyi Guo, Mingtao Ma, Yue Feng, Yi Zhong, Chen Chen, Chun Ge, Jianjun Zou, Yanna Si
{"title":"A machine learning stacking model accurately estimating gastric fluid volume in patients undergoing elective sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy.","authors":"Yuqing Yan, Yuzhan Jin, Yaoyi Guo, Mingtao Ma, Yue Feng, Yi Zhong, Chen Chen, Chun Ge, Jianjun Zou, Yanna Si","doi":"10.1080/00325481.2024.2333720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) assessment of gastric fluid volume primarily relies on the traditional linear approach, which often suffers from moderate accuracy. This study aimed to develop an advanced machine learning (ML) model to estimate gastric fluid volume more accurately.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and POCUS data (D1: craniocaudal diameter, D2: anteroposterior diameter) of 1386 patients undergoing elective sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE) at Nanjing First Hospital to predict gastric fluid volume using ML techniques, including six different ML models and a stacking model. We evaluated the models using the adjusted Coefficient of Determination (R<sup>2</sup>), mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE). The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to interpret the importance of the variables. Finally, a web calculator was constructed to facilitate its clinical application.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stacking model (Linear regression + Multilayer perceptron) performed best, with the highest adjusted R<sup>2</sup> of 0.718 (0.632 to 0.804). The mean prediction bias was 4 ml (MAE: 4.008 (3.68 to 4.336)), which is better than that of the linear model. D1 and D2 ranked high in the SHAP plot and performed better in the right lateral decubitus (RLD) than in the supine position. The web calculator can be accessed at https://cheason.shinyapps.io/Stacking_regressor/.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The stacking model and its web calculator can serve as practical tools for accurately estimating gastric fluid volume in patients undergoing elective sedated GIE. It is recommended that anesthesiologists measure D1 and D2 in the patient's RLD position.</p>","PeriodicalId":94176,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate medicine","volume":" ","pages":"302-311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2024.2333720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The current point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) assessment of gastric fluid volume primarily relies on the traditional linear approach, which often suffers from moderate accuracy. This study aimed to develop an advanced machine learning (ML) model to estimate gastric fluid volume more accurately.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and POCUS data (D1: craniocaudal diameter, D2: anteroposterior diameter) of 1386 patients undergoing elective sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE) at Nanjing First Hospital to predict gastric fluid volume using ML techniques, including six different ML models and a stacking model. We evaluated the models using the adjusted Coefficient of Determination (R2), mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE). The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to interpret the importance of the variables. Finally, a web calculator was constructed to facilitate its clinical application.

Results: The stacking model (Linear regression + Multilayer perceptron) performed best, with the highest adjusted R2 of 0.718 (0.632 to 0.804). The mean prediction bias was 4 ml (MAE: 4.008 (3.68 to 4.336)), which is better than that of the linear model. D1 and D2 ranked high in the SHAP plot and performed better in the right lateral decubitus (RLD) than in the supine position. The web calculator can be accessed at https://cheason.shinyapps.io/Stacking_regressor/.

Conclusion: The stacking model and its web calculator can serve as practical tools for accurately estimating gastric fluid volume in patients undergoing elective sedated GIE. It is recommended that anesthesiologists measure D1 and D2 in the patient's RLD position.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习堆叠模型可准确估计接受择期镇静胃肠道内窥镜检查患者的胃液量。
背景:目前的床旁超声(POCUS)胃液容量评估主要依赖于传统的线性方法,其准确性往往不高。本研究旨在开发一种先进的机器学习(ML)模型,以更准确地估计胃液容量:我们回顾性分析了在南京市第一医院接受择期镇静消化内镜检查(GIE)的1386名患者的临床数据和POCUS数据(D1:颅尾径,D2:前胸径),利用ML技术预测胃液量,包括6种不同的ML模型和1种堆叠模型。我们使用调整后的决定系数(R2)、平均绝对误差(MAE)和均方根误差(RMSE)对模型进行了评估。我们还使用了 SHapley Additive exPlanations(SHAP)方法来解释变量的重要性。最后,还制作了一个网络计算器,以方便临床应用:叠加模型(线性回归 + 多层感知器)表现最佳,调整后的 R2 最高,为 0.718(0.632 至 0.804)。平均预测偏差为 4 毫升(MAE:4.008(3.68 至 4.336)),优于线性模型。D1和D2在SHAP图中排名靠前,右侧卧位(RLD)比仰卧位表现更好。网络计算器可通过 https://cheason.shinyapps.io/Stacking_regressor/.Conclusion 访问:堆叠模型及其网络计算器可作为实用工具,用于准确估计接受择期镇静 GIE 患者的胃液量。建议麻醉医师在患者仰卧位时测量 D1 和 D2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Delayed diagnosis of adult onset Still's disease in 2 cases: diagnostic dilemma in positive antinuclear antibody and tuberculosis endemic areas. The triglyceride-glucose index as an indicator of latent atherogenicity of the plasma lipid profile in healthy men with normolipidaemia. Calcific aortic valve disease and cardiometabolic triggers: an explanation behind progression of aortic valvular disease and failure of medical therapy interventions. Advances in insulin: a review of icodec as a novel once-weekly treatment for type 2 diabetes. Is it time to finally retire the pantoprazole "drip"?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1