Perceptions of the Zika Virus, Contraceptive Access, and Motivation to Participate in the Zika Contraception Access Network Program: Qualitative Analysis of Focusgroup Discussions with Puerto Rican Women.

Puerto Rico health sciences journal Pub Date : 2024-03-01
Lisa Romero, Edna Acosta-Pérez, Hailey Bednar, Stacey Hurst, Lauren B Zapata, Samaris Vega-Torres, Rachel Powell, Eva Lathrop
{"title":"Perceptions of the Zika Virus, Contraceptive Access, and Motivation to Participate in the Zika Contraception Access Network Program: Qualitative Analysis of Focusgroup Discussions with Puerto Rican Women.","authors":"Lisa Romero, Edna Acosta-Pérez, Hailey Bednar, Stacey Hurst, Lauren B Zapata, Samaris Vega-Torres, Rachel Powell, Eva Lathrop","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>During the 2016-2017 Zika virus outbreak in Puerto Rico, the Zika Contraception Access Network (Z-CAN) provided client-centered contraceptive counseling and access to the full range of reversible contraceptive methods at no cost to prevent unintended pregnancies and thereby to reduce Zika-related birth outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To understand how Puerto Rican women's perceptions of the Zika virus affected contraceptive decisions and assess how they heard about the Z-CAN program and what influenced their participation, or lack thereof, 24 focus-group discussions were conducted among women of reproductive age who did and did not participate in Z-CAN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women who participated in the discussions often had heard about Z-CAN from their physician or friends; non-participants had heard about Z-CAN from Facebook or friends. Women expressed satisfaction on finding a Z-CAN clinic and valued the same-day provision of contraceptives. When a preferred contraceptive method or a first appointment was not readily available, women reconsidered accessing the program. Women's perceptions and trust of reproductive healthcare providers, their engagement in social networks, and their ability to choose a contraceptive method that best meets their needs can influence participation in contraception-access programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Focus groups can be used to understand women's knowledge of the Zika virus, barriers and facilitators to contraception access, and motivations for participation in the Z-CAN program.</p>","PeriodicalId":94183,"journal":{"name":"Puerto Rico health sciences journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11002974/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Puerto Rico health sciences journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: During the 2016-2017 Zika virus outbreak in Puerto Rico, the Zika Contraception Access Network (Z-CAN) provided client-centered contraceptive counseling and access to the full range of reversible contraceptive methods at no cost to prevent unintended pregnancies and thereby to reduce Zika-related birth outcomes.

Methods: To understand how Puerto Rican women's perceptions of the Zika virus affected contraceptive decisions and assess how they heard about the Z-CAN program and what influenced their participation, or lack thereof, 24 focus-group discussions were conducted among women of reproductive age who did and did not participate in Z-CAN.

Results: Women who participated in the discussions often had heard about Z-CAN from their physician or friends; non-participants had heard about Z-CAN from Facebook or friends. Women expressed satisfaction on finding a Z-CAN clinic and valued the same-day provision of contraceptives. When a preferred contraceptive method or a first appointment was not readily available, women reconsidered accessing the program. Women's perceptions and trust of reproductive healthcare providers, their engagement in social networks, and their ability to choose a contraceptive method that best meets their needs can influence participation in contraception-access programs.

Conclusion: Focus groups can be used to understand women's knowledge of the Zika virus, barriers and facilitators to contraception access, and motivations for participation in the Z-CAN program.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对寨卡病毒的看法、避孕药具的获取以及参与寨卡避孕药具获取网络计划的动机:对波多黎各妇女焦点小组讨论的定性分析》。
目标:在 2016-2017 年波多黎各寨卡病毒爆发期间,寨卡避孕普及网络(Z-CAN)提供了以客户为中心的避孕咨询,并免费提供各种可逆避孕方法,以防止意外怀孕,从而减少与寨卡病毒相关的生育后果:为了了解波多黎各妇女对寨卡病毒的看法如何影响她们的避孕决定,并评估她们是如何听说 Z-CAN 计划的,以及是什么影响了她们参与或不参与该计划,我们对参与和未参与 Z-CAN 计划的育龄妇女进行了 24 次焦点小组讨论:结果:参与讨论的妇女通常是从医生或朋友那里听说 Z-CAN 的;未参与讨论的妇女则是从 Facebook 或朋友那里听说 Z-CAN 的。妇女对找到 Z-CAN 诊所表示满意,并对当天提供避孕药具表示重视。当首选的避孕方法或首次预约不方便时,妇女会重新考虑是否参加该计划。妇女对生殖医疗服务提供者的看法和信任、她们在社会网络中的参与度以及她们选择最符合自身需求的避孕方法的能力,都会影响她们对避孕药具获取项目的参与:焦点小组可用于了解妇女对寨卡病毒的认识、获得避孕药具的障碍和促进因素,以及参与 Z-CAN 计划的动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Bayesian Projection of the Total Fertility Rate of Puerto Rico: 2020-2050. Airway Clearance Techniques in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: A Systematic Review. Clinical Consequences of Delayed Treatment for Tinea Capitis (Ringworm of the Scalp): A Case Report. Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Shows Liver Fibrosis Regression on Three Noninvasive Tests: A Puerto Rican Cohort. Hypergammaglobulinemia D and Periodic Fever Syndrome (HIDS) in a 3-year-old Patient from Puerto Rico.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1