Development and validation of a Spanish version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 item score (ObsQoR-10-Spanish)

Jennifer Guevara , Carlos Sánchez , Jessica Organista-Montaño , Benjamin W. Domingue , Nan Guo , Pervez Sultan
{"title":"Development and validation of a Spanish version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 item score (ObsQoR-10-Spanish)","authors":"Jennifer Guevara ,&nbsp;Carlos Sánchez ,&nbsp;Jessica Organista-Montaño ,&nbsp;Benjamin W. Domingue ,&nbsp;Nan Guo ,&nbsp;Pervez Sultan","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Spanish is the second most spoken language globally with around 475 million native speakers. We aimed to validate a Spanish version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 item (ObsQoR-10) patient-reported outcome measure.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>ObsQoR-10-Spanish was developed using EuroQoL methodology. ObsQoR-10-Spanish was assessed in 100 Spanish-speaking patients undergoing elective Caesarean or vaginal delivery. Patients &lt;38 weeks, undergoing an intrapartum Caesarean delivery, intrauterine death, or maternal admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) were excluded. Validity was assessed by evaluating (i) convergent validity—correlation with 24-h EuroQoL and global health visual analogue scale (GHVAS) scores (0–100); (ii) discriminant validity—difference in ObsQoR-10-Spanish score for patients with GHVAS scores &gt;70 <em>vs</em> &lt;70; (iii) hypothesis testing—correlation of ObsQoR score with maternal and neonatal factors; and (iv) cross-cultural validity assessed using differential item functioning analysis. Reliability was assessed by evaluating: (i) internal consistency; (ii) split-half reliability and (iii) test–retest reliability; and (iv) floor and ceiling effects.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One hundred patients were approached, recruited, and completed surveys. Validity: (i) convergent validity: the ObsQoR 24-h score correlated moderately with the 24-h EuroQoL (<em>r</em>=−0.632) and GHVAS scores (<em>r</em>=0.590); (ii) discriminant validity: the ObsQoR-10-Spanish 24-h scores were higher in women who delivered vaginally compared to via Caesarean delivery, (mean [standard deviation] scores were 89 [9] <em>vs</em> 81 [12]; <em>P</em>&lt;0.001). The 24-h ObsQoR-Spanish scores were lower in patients experiencing a poor <em>vs</em> a good recovery (mean [standard deviation] scores were 76 [12.3] <em>vs</em> 87.1 [10.6]; <em>P</em>=0.001); (iii) hypothesis testing: the ObsQoR-10 score correlated negatively with age (<em>r</em>=−0.207) and positively with 5-min (<em>r</em>=0.204) and 10-min (<em>r</em>=0.243) Apgar scores. Remaining correlations were not significant; and (iv) differential item functioning analysis suggested no potential bias among the 10 items. Reliability: (i) internal consistency was good (Cronbach alpha=0.763); (ii) split-half reliability was good (Spearman–Brown prophesy reliability estimate of 0.866); (iii) test–retest reliability was excellent with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.90; and (iv) floor and ceiling effects: six patients scored a maximum total ObsQoR-10 score.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The ObsQoR-10-Spanish patient-reported outcome measure is valid, reliable, and clinically feasible, and should be considered for use in Spanish-speaking women to assess quality of inpatient postpartum recovery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000133/pdfft?md5=ab561d1e65b006327b8fa0c7a786943d&pid=1-s2.0-S2772609624000133-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJA open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Spanish is the second most spoken language globally with around 475 million native speakers. We aimed to validate a Spanish version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 item (ObsQoR-10) patient-reported outcome measure.

Methods

ObsQoR-10-Spanish was developed using EuroQoL methodology. ObsQoR-10-Spanish was assessed in 100 Spanish-speaking patients undergoing elective Caesarean or vaginal delivery. Patients <38 weeks, undergoing an intrapartum Caesarean delivery, intrauterine death, or maternal admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) were excluded. Validity was assessed by evaluating (i) convergent validity—correlation with 24-h EuroQoL and global health visual analogue scale (GHVAS) scores (0–100); (ii) discriminant validity—difference in ObsQoR-10-Spanish score for patients with GHVAS scores >70 vs <70; (iii) hypothesis testing—correlation of ObsQoR score with maternal and neonatal factors; and (iv) cross-cultural validity assessed using differential item functioning analysis. Reliability was assessed by evaluating: (i) internal consistency; (ii) split-half reliability and (iii) test–retest reliability; and (iv) floor and ceiling effects.

Results

One hundred patients were approached, recruited, and completed surveys. Validity: (i) convergent validity: the ObsQoR 24-h score correlated moderately with the 24-h EuroQoL (r=−0.632) and GHVAS scores (r=0.590); (ii) discriminant validity: the ObsQoR-10-Spanish 24-h scores were higher in women who delivered vaginally compared to via Caesarean delivery, (mean [standard deviation] scores were 89 [9] vs 81 [12]; P<0.001). The 24-h ObsQoR-Spanish scores were lower in patients experiencing a poor vs a good recovery (mean [standard deviation] scores were 76 [12.3] vs 87.1 [10.6]; P=0.001); (iii) hypothesis testing: the ObsQoR-10 score correlated negatively with age (r=−0.207) and positively with 5-min (r=0.204) and 10-min (r=0.243) Apgar scores. Remaining correlations were not significant; and (iv) differential item functioning analysis suggested no potential bias among the 10 items. Reliability: (i) internal consistency was good (Cronbach alpha=0.763); (ii) split-half reliability was good (Spearman–Brown prophesy reliability estimate of 0.866); (iii) test–retest reliability was excellent with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.90; and (iv) floor and ceiling effects: six patients scored a maximum total ObsQoR-10 score.

Conclusions

The ObsQoR-10-Spanish patient-reported outcome measure is valid, reliable, and clinically feasible, and should be considered for use in Spanish-speaking women to assess quality of inpatient postpartum recovery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产科恢复质量-10 项目评分西班牙文版本(ObsQoR-10-Spanish)的开发与验证
背景西班牙语是全球第二大通用语言,母语使用者约有 4.75 亿人。我们的目的是验证西班牙语版本的产科恢复质量-10 项(ObsQoR-10)患者报告结果测量方法。对 100 名接受择期剖腹产或阴道分娩的西班牙语患者进行了 ObsQoR-10-Spanish 评估。不包括孕 38 周、产中剖腹产、宫内死亡或产妇入住重症监护室(ICU)的患者。效度评估包括:(i)收敛效度--与24 h EuroQoL和全球健康视觉模拟量表(GHVAS)评分(0-100分)的相关性;(ii)判别效度--GHVAS评分为>70 vs <70的患者ObsQoR-10-Spanish评分的差异;(iii)假设检验--ObsQoR评分与产妇和新生儿因素的相关性;(iv)跨文化效度,使用差异项目功能分析进行评估。可靠性评估包括:(i) 内部一致性;(ii) 分半可靠性;(iii) 测试-再测可靠性;(iv) 最低效应和最高效应。有效性:(i)收敛有效性:ObsQoR 24 小时评分与 EuroQoL 24 小时评分(r=-0.632)和 GHVAS 评分(r=0.590)呈中度相关;(ii)判别有效性:阴道分娩产妇的 ObsQoR-10-Spanish 24 小时评分高于剖腹产产妇(平均[标准差]评分为 89 [9] vs 81 [12];P<0.001)。24小时ObsQoR-西班牙文评分在恢复较差和恢复较好的患者中都较低(平均[标准差]评分为76 [12.3] vs 87.1 [10.6];P=0.001);(iii) 假设检验:ObsQoR-10评分与年龄呈负相关(r=-0.207),与5分钟(r=0.204)和10分钟(r=0.243)Apgar评分呈正相关。其余相关性不显著;(iv) 差异项目功能分析表明 10 个项目之间没有潜在偏差。可靠性:(i) 内部一致性良好(Cronbach alpha=0.763);(ii) 分半可靠性良好(Spearman-Brown 预言可靠性估计值为 0.866);(iii) 测试-重测可靠性极佳,类内相关系数为 0.结论ObsQoR-10-西班牙语患者报告结果测量有效、可靠、临床可行,应考虑用于西班牙语妇女产后住院恢复质量的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJA open
BJA open Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
期刊最新文献
Xenon anaesthesia is associated with a reduction in frontal electroencephalogram peak alpha frequency Moderate or severe pain in recovery after major elective surgery: A pilot retrospective analysis to identify those at risk Association between plasma-free haemoglobin and postoperative acute kidney injury in paediatric cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study Oxygen insufflation via the working channel during tracheal intubation guided by a flexible optical scope and benefits, dangers, and future of the method: a narrative review Incidence and trajectories of subclinical and KDIGO-defined postoperative acute kidney injury in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1