Development and validation of a Spanish version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 item score (ObsQoR-10-Spanish)

Jennifer Guevara , Carlos Sánchez , Jessica Organista-Montaño , Benjamin W. Domingue , Nan Guo , Pervez Sultan
{"title":"Development and validation of a Spanish version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 item score (ObsQoR-10-Spanish)","authors":"Jennifer Guevara ,&nbsp;Carlos Sánchez ,&nbsp;Jessica Organista-Montaño ,&nbsp;Benjamin W. Domingue ,&nbsp;Nan Guo ,&nbsp;Pervez Sultan","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Spanish is the second most spoken language globally with around 475 million native speakers. We aimed to validate a Spanish version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 item (ObsQoR-10) patient-reported outcome measure.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>ObsQoR-10-Spanish was developed using EuroQoL methodology. ObsQoR-10-Spanish was assessed in 100 Spanish-speaking patients undergoing elective Caesarean or vaginal delivery. Patients &lt;38 weeks, undergoing an intrapartum Caesarean delivery, intrauterine death, or maternal admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) were excluded. Validity was assessed by evaluating (i) convergent validity—correlation with 24-h EuroQoL and global health visual analogue scale (GHVAS) scores (0–100); (ii) discriminant validity—difference in ObsQoR-10-Spanish score for patients with GHVAS scores &gt;70 <em>vs</em> &lt;70; (iii) hypothesis testing—correlation of ObsQoR score with maternal and neonatal factors; and (iv) cross-cultural validity assessed using differential item functioning analysis. Reliability was assessed by evaluating: (i) internal consistency; (ii) split-half reliability and (iii) test–retest reliability; and (iv) floor and ceiling effects.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One hundred patients were approached, recruited, and completed surveys. Validity: (i) convergent validity: the ObsQoR 24-h score correlated moderately with the 24-h EuroQoL (<em>r</em>=−0.632) and GHVAS scores (<em>r</em>=0.590); (ii) discriminant validity: the ObsQoR-10-Spanish 24-h scores were higher in women who delivered vaginally compared to via Caesarean delivery, (mean [standard deviation] scores were 89 [9] <em>vs</em> 81 [12]; <em>P</em>&lt;0.001). The 24-h ObsQoR-Spanish scores were lower in patients experiencing a poor <em>vs</em> a good recovery (mean [standard deviation] scores were 76 [12.3] <em>vs</em> 87.1 [10.6]; <em>P</em>=0.001); (iii) hypothesis testing: the ObsQoR-10 score correlated negatively with age (<em>r</em>=−0.207) and positively with 5-min (<em>r</em>=0.204) and 10-min (<em>r</em>=0.243) Apgar scores. Remaining correlations were not significant; and (iv) differential item functioning analysis suggested no potential bias among the 10 items. Reliability: (i) internal consistency was good (Cronbach alpha=0.763); (ii) split-half reliability was good (Spearman–Brown prophesy reliability estimate of 0.866); (iii) test–retest reliability was excellent with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.90; and (iv) floor and ceiling effects: six patients scored a maximum total ObsQoR-10 score.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The ObsQoR-10-Spanish patient-reported outcome measure is valid, reliable, and clinically feasible, and should be considered for use in Spanish-speaking women to assess quality of inpatient postpartum recovery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000133/pdfft?md5=ab561d1e65b006327b8fa0c7a786943d&pid=1-s2.0-S2772609624000133-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJA open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Spanish is the second most spoken language globally with around 475 million native speakers. We aimed to validate a Spanish version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 item (ObsQoR-10) patient-reported outcome measure.

Methods

ObsQoR-10-Spanish was developed using EuroQoL methodology. ObsQoR-10-Spanish was assessed in 100 Spanish-speaking patients undergoing elective Caesarean or vaginal delivery. Patients <38 weeks, undergoing an intrapartum Caesarean delivery, intrauterine death, or maternal admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) were excluded. Validity was assessed by evaluating (i) convergent validity—correlation with 24-h EuroQoL and global health visual analogue scale (GHVAS) scores (0–100); (ii) discriminant validity—difference in ObsQoR-10-Spanish score for patients with GHVAS scores >70 vs <70; (iii) hypothesis testing—correlation of ObsQoR score with maternal and neonatal factors; and (iv) cross-cultural validity assessed using differential item functioning analysis. Reliability was assessed by evaluating: (i) internal consistency; (ii) split-half reliability and (iii) test–retest reliability; and (iv) floor and ceiling effects.

Results

One hundred patients were approached, recruited, and completed surveys. Validity: (i) convergent validity: the ObsQoR 24-h score correlated moderately with the 24-h EuroQoL (r=−0.632) and GHVAS scores (r=0.590); (ii) discriminant validity: the ObsQoR-10-Spanish 24-h scores were higher in women who delivered vaginally compared to via Caesarean delivery, (mean [standard deviation] scores were 89 [9] vs 81 [12]; P<0.001). The 24-h ObsQoR-Spanish scores were lower in patients experiencing a poor vs a good recovery (mean [standard deviation] scores were 76 [12.3] vs 87.1 [10.6]; P=0.001); (iii) hypothesis testing: the ObsQoR-10 score correlated negatively with age (r=−0.207) and positively with 5-min (r=0.204) and 10-min (r=0.243) Apgar scores. Remaining correlations were not significant; and (iv) differential item functioning analysis suggested no potential bias among the 10 items. Reliability: (i) internal consistency was good (Cronbach alpha=0.763); (ii) split-half reliability was good (Spearman–Brown prophesy reliability estimate of 0.866); (iii) test–retest reliability was excellent with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.90; and (iv) floor and ceiling effects: six patients scored a maximum total ObsQoR-10 score.

Conclusions

The ObsQoR-10-Spanish patient-reported outcome measure is valid, reliable, and clinically feasible, and should be considered for use in Spanish-speaking women to assess quality of inpatient postpartum recovery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产科恢复质量-10 项目评分西班牙文版本(ObsQoR-10-Spanish)的开发与验证
背景西班牙语是全球第二大通用语言,母语使用者约有 4.75 亿人。我们的目的是验证西班牙语版本的产科恢复质量-10 项(ObsQoR-10)患者报告结果测量方法。对 100 名接受择期剖腹产或阴道分娩的西班牙语患者进行了 ObsQoR-10-Spanish 评估。不包括孕 38 周、产中剖腹产、宫内死亡或产妇入住重症监护室(ICU)的患者。效度评估包括:(i)收敛效度--与24 h EuroQoL和全球健康视觉模拟量表(GHVAS)评分(0-100分)的相关性;(ii)判别效度--GHVAS评分为>70 vs <70的患者ObsQoR-10-Spanish评分的差异;(iii)假设检验--ObsQoR评分与产妇和新生儿因素的相关性;(iv)跨文化效度,使用差异项目功能分析进行评估。可靠性评估包括:(i) 内部一致性;(ii) 分半可靠性;(iii) 测试-再测可靠性;(iv) 最低效应和最高效应。有效性:(i)收敛有效性:ObsQoR 24 小时评分与 EuroQoL 24 小时评分(r=-0.632)和 GHVAS 评分(r=0.590)呈中度相关;(ii)判别有效性:阴道分娩产妇的 ObsQoR-10-Spanish 24 小时评分高于剖腹产产妇(平均[标准差]评分为 89 [9] vs 81 [12];P<0.001)。24小时ObsQoR-西班牙文评分在恢复较差和恢复较好的患者中都较低(平均[标准差]评分为76 [12.3] vs 87.1 [10.6];P=0.001);(iii) 假设检验:ObsQoR-10评分与年龄呈负相关(r=-0.207),与5分钟(r=0.204)和10分钟(r=0.243)Apgar评分呈正相关。其余相关性不显著;(iv) 差异项目功能分析表明 10 个项目之间没有潜在偏差。可靠性:(i) 内部一致性良好(Cronbach alpha=0.763);(ii) 分半可靠性良好(Spearman-Brown 预言可靠性估计值为 0.866);(iii) 测试-重测可靠性极佳,类内相关系数为 0.结论ObsQoR-10-西班牙语患者报告结果测量有效、可靠、临床可行,应考虑用于西班牙语妇女产后住院恢复质量的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJA open
BJA open Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
期刊最新文献
Cardiac coherence and medical hypnosis: a feasibility study of a new combined approach for managing preoperative anxiety in patients with breast or gynaecological cancer Perioperative considerations in the paediatric patient with congenital and acquired coagulopathy Evaluation of lung homogeneity in neonates and small infants during general anaesthesia using electrical impedance tomography: a prospective observational study Paediatric perioperative hypersensitivity: the performance of the current consensus formula and the effect of uneventful anaesthesia on serum tryptase. Reply to BJA Open 2024; 9: 100254 An update on iron therapy as an intervention to reduce blood transfusion for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1